BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Lancaster House - ECPv6.15.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lancasterhouse.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Lancaster House
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20230101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230815T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230815T140000
DTSTAMP:20260426T095817
CREATED:20230518T200026Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230808T132937Z
UID:8247-1692102600-1692108000@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Lancaster's Workplace Essentials: Tackling progressive discipline issues
DESCRIPTION:Moderators\n\n \nKeith Burkhardt\nEmployer Counsel\nSherrard Kuzz \n\n\n \nJessica Greenwood\nUnion Counsel\nRavenlaw \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nOdessa O’Dell\nEmployer Counsel\nBorden Ladner Gervais \n\n\n \nWally Fiander\nExecutive Staff Officer – Member Services\nNova Scotia Teachers Union \n\n\nIn this instalment of Lancaster’s Workplace Essentials webinar series\, expert panelists will examine recent caselaw and key principles relating to progressive discipline. Topics to be addressed include: \n\nWhat is the distinction between job coaching and training\, performance management\, and discipline? When may non-disciplinary approaches be appropriate to improve employee behaviour?\nIs it necessary to apply a “progressive” approach to discipline in all cases? When are employers justified in imposing more serious consequences at first instance?\nCan the progressive discipline process be “bypassed” by relying on language to that effect in a contract\, collective agreement\, or policy? For example:\n\nWhere a “penalty provision” stipulates a severe consequence for a specific type of workplace misconduct?\nWhere the employer has a “zero tolerance” policy in place?\nWhere there is a “last chance” agreement in place?\n\n\nWhat is the doctrine of “culminating incident”? When may an employer rely on earlier misconduct by an employee in support of more serious disciplinary consequences for subsequent misdeeds? How may a “sunset clause” impact this analysis?\nWhat consequences can flow from a court’s or arbitrator’s finding that an employer improperly failed to apply a progressive approach to discipline?\nHow can employers and unions collaborate to develop progressive discipline processes that are both fair and effective in deterring employee misconduct?\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Category A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of Saskatchewan for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive Hours; 0 Professionalism Hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/lancasters-workplace-essentials-tackling-progressive-discipline-issues/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/stock/tackling-progressive-discipline.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR