BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Lancaster House - ECPv6.15.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Lancaster House
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lancasterhouse.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Lancaster House
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Denver
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20260308T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20261101T080000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260415
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20260417
DTSTAMP:20260415T023146
CREATED:20251001T183305Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260410T181644Z
UID:17907-1776211200-1776383999@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:B.C. Human Rights and Accommodation Conference
DESCRIPTION:What to Expect \nIn this conference\, leading labour relations\, lawyers\, and human rights professionals will explore recent legal developments and emerging workplace human rights challenges in B.C. and federally. \nThroughout the event\, panelists from union-side\, employer-side\, and neutral perspectives will share their insights through moderated discussions. Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions verbally or electronically at the end of each panel. \nParticipants will also be provided with a comprehensive set of digital materials including textbook chapters\, case summaries\, and other online resources relevant to panel discussions These resources\, developed through hours of research by Lancaster House program lawyers\, will prove invaluable for future reference. \nAttendees also have the option to attend our featured expert-led workshop offered by our Centre for Labour Relations Training & Development\, taking place the day after the conference\, where attendees will engage in panel hands-on scenarios tailored to address real workplace human rights challenges. \n\nWho Should Attend? \nThis conference will provide invaluable learning and networking opportunities for: \nThis event is designed for professionals across multiple industries\, including: \n\nHuman Resources Leaders – HR managers\, directors\, and disability management specialists navigating accommodations and compliance.\nEmployment & Labour Lawyers – Legal professionals seeking updates on human rights and workplace accommodation case law.\nUnion Representatives & Labour Relations Experts – Advocates ensuring fair treatment of employees in collective bargaining.\nCorporate Executives & Compliance Officers – Business leaders responsible for implementing workplace policies aligned with human rights law.\nGovernment & Public Sector Professionals – HR and legal representatives working in municipal\, provincial\, and federal agencies.\n\n\nLearning Outcomes \nBy attending this conference\, you will: \n✔ Understand the latest human rights law updates and their impact on workplace policies. \n✔ Gain best practices for accommodation requests related to disability\, religion\, and family status. \n✔ Develop strategies for fostering an inclusive workplace and preventing discrimination. \n✔ Learn from top legal and HR experts through engaging panel discussions and real-world case studies. \n✔ Network with industry peers and build valuable professional connections. \n\nWednesday\, April 15\, 2026 \nBreakfast: 8:00 – 9:00 am \n\nIntroductory Remarks: 9:00 – 9:05 am \nKeynote - Indigenizing/Decolonizing the Workplace - 9:05 – 9:35 am\n\n  \n\n \nPatricia Barkaskas\nAssociate Professor\nAllard School of Law\nThe University of British Columbia \n\n\nWhether Gramsci did actually utter the exact words of the currently oft-quoted phrase\, “The old world is dying\, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters”\, or not\, this statement is clearly a portent of our present moment. The persistent attack in this time on the values of equity\, diversity\, and inclusion is evident and pervasive. These values\, central to Canadian human rights law and those whose work involves protecting human rights\, are important and yet\, they fail to include decolonization or meaningfully consider Indigenous human rights – this is particularly true in the context of human rights in workplaces. However\, given the upheaval of the old\, perhaps this moment provides an opportunity to imagine a new world that does not simply re-entrench previous systems that support equity\, diversity\, and inclusion\, although these remain significant\, but dares to instead reimagine a transformative approach to human rights that leads from a place of decolonization and Indigenous human rights.Panel 1 - New and Noteworthy: Major recent caselaw\, legislation\, and policy developments - 9:35 – 10:50 am\n\n\n \nJodie Gauthier\nUnion Counsel\nBlack Burke Mayor \n\n\n \nAmanda Rogers\nArbitrator/Mediator/Lawyer \n\n\n \nLauren Soubolsky\nEmployer Counsel\nMcCarthy Tetrault \n\n\nThis session provides a focused review of significant developments in British Columbia labour\, employment\, and human rights law. Specifically\, panelists will address: \nCaselaw: \n\nIn what circumstances will ‘unconscious bias’ amount to discrimination in hiring or recruitment?\nHow do recent decisions affect employers’ obligations to investigate allegations of discrimination and harassment?\nWhen will an employee’s controversial views\, whether expressed online or in the workplace\, justify discipline\, discharge\, or damages?\nWhat forms of disability accommodation do courts and tribunals expect employers to implement? When do accommodations cross the line from what is reasonable to undue hardship?\nWhen does interference with a family obligation constitute discrimination? How does one distinguish between family responsibilities deserving of protection and personal preferences?\nWhat limits are courts and arbitrators placing on employer surveillance and monitoring of employees?\nWhen does the Charter apply to decisions by employers or quasi-governmental bodies\, particularly those involving vaccination policies\, political expression\, or collective bargaining?\nWhat trends are emerging in damage awards for discrimination\, failure to accommodate\, and reprisal?\n\nLegislation: \nThis session will also cover recent and upcoming changes to BC and federal legislation\, including: \n\nC. Employment Standards Amendment Act\, Bill 11 – 2025: new rules governing sick notes;\nC. Pay Transparency Act: new pay reporting requirements; and\nC. Employment Standards Act: new leaves for serious personal illness or injury.\nCanada Labour Code amendments:\n\nleaves for pregnancy and bereavement;\nreplacement workers during strikes and lockouts; and\nand non-compete agreements.\n\n\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments. \nBreak: 10:50 – 11:05 am \nPanel 2 - Human Rights in the Hybrid Workplace: Giving effect to employee accommodations in the context of a return-to-office mandate - 11:05 – 12:15 pm\n\n\n \nKai Ying Chieh\nEmployer Counsel\nOverholt Law LLP \n\n\n \nPeter Eastwood\nUnion Counsel\nHamilton Howell Bain & Gould \n\n\n \nDr. Hajera Rostam\nRegistered Psychologist \nPrivate Practice \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will examine return-to-office mandates through a human rights lens. The panel will address questions such as: \n\nWhat features of a general return-to-office mandate will violate human rights? How will collective agreement language affect the matter?\nHow do such requirements impact mental health? Does remote or hybrid work mitigate or exacerbate mental health? Inequity?\nIn what circumstances have arbitrators or adjudicators found that employees must be accommodated through work-from-home arrangements for health-related reasons or to accommodate child- or elder-care responsibilities? What information can employers require to support such a request?\nWhen will an order that an employee return to in-person work amount to a bona fide occupational requirement? When will an employer be able to establish that it would amount to undue hardship to allow an employee to work on a remote\, hybrid\, or flexible basis?\nHow can one distinguish personal preferences from legitimate accommodation needs? How can parties work effectively with medical and mental health professionals to identify and support accommodation needs?\nWhat practical considerations should be taken into account when assessing whether employees should be permitted to work from home? What flexible working options are available other than remote or hybrid work?\nWhat practices help reduce conflict\, resentment\, or disengagement when accommodations are being considered\, implemented\, or denied?\n\n\nNetworking lunch: 12:15 – 1:00 pm \nFireside Chat - Navigating resistance to EDI initiatives - 1:00 – 1:45 pm\n\n\n \nHasan Alam\nStaff Lawyer\nB.C. General Employees’ Union (BCGEU) \n\n\n \nKasari Govender\nCommissioner\nBC’s Office of the Human Rights Commissioner \n\n\nJoin the B.C. Human Rights Commissioner and experienced labour relations practitioners in a candid conversation about the shifting landscape of EDI initiatives in Canada as they examine evolving pushback to this work\, the implications for equity-deserving individuals\, and what is and is not working in current approaches. Participants will leave better equipped to navigate EDI fatigue and opposition while upholding human rights and furthering the collective pursuit of safe\, equitable workplaces for all.Break: 1:45 – 2:05 pm \n\nPanel 3 - Repairing Harm: Exploring restorative solutions following human rights transgressions - 2:05 – 3:35 pm\n\n\n \nStarleigh Grass\nAssistant Director\nField Services Division\nBritish Columbia Teachers Federation (BCTF) \n\n\n \nChristianne Paras\nExecutive Director of Restorative Justice Association of BC \n\n\nWhen human rights violations occur in the workplace\, traditional labour relations tools alone – such as discipline – may fall short in addressing the needs of the complainant\, repairing relationships\, and preventing future harm. In this session\, panelists will explore the use of restorative approaches\, addressing questions such as: \n\nWhat does it mean to adopt a “restorative approach” to conflict and human rights violations? What unique benefits can such approaches provide?\nWhen can or should alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) be used to address human rights transgressions at work? What ADR options exist\, and what are the relevant advantages and disadvantages of each?\nWhat steps can parties take to address barriers to equity when implementing restorative approaches?\nWhat factors have arbitrators considered in recent cases in determining whether an employment relationship is salvageable following an employee’s human rights breaches? What room exists for education and reintegration rather than discipline?\nWhat “early warning signs” indicate that a workplace is in need of restoration? How can restorative approaches\, implemented early\, assist in preventing future harm?\nWhat steps can employers and unions take to ensure that a healthy and safe work environment is restored following a human rights violation? How can restorative approaches address systemic or collective harm?\nWhat changes can be made to workplace policies or collective agreements to incorporate restorative approaches? What are the respective roles of employers\, unions\, and employees in implementing these approaches?\n\nClosing remarks: 3:35 – 3:45 pm \n\nThursday\, April 16\, 2026 \nBreakfast and registration: 8:00 – 9:00 am \n\nOpening remarks: 9:00 – 9:05 am \n\nPanel 4 - Respecting Rights\, Achieving Closure: Strategies for successful mediation of human rights disputes - 9:05 – 10:20 am\n\n\n \nMenachem Freedman\nUnion Counsel\nHamilton Howell Bain & Gould \n\n\n \nEric Ito\nEmployer Counsel\nCooperwilliams Truman & Ito LLP \n\n\n \nKoml Kandola\nArbitrator and Mediator\nKandola Arbitration Services Ltd. \n\n\nMediation is a vital tool used to successfully resolve human rights disputes in the workplace. This panel will address common challenges surrounding the mediation process and provide attendees with practical takeaways. Specifically\, the panel will answer the following questions: \n\nWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of mediation in human rights disputes? When will it be beneficial to participate in mediation-adjudication or mediation-arbitration?\nHow should the parties assess the merits of a case and determine if a settlement is feasible? What types of files are not appropriate for mediation?\nHow can the parties efficiently prepare for mediation? What information must be gathered?\nHow can the parties determine if power imbalances\, accessibility barriers\, or other barriers to equity will affect the mediation process? What measures can the parties implement to address these barriers?\nIs a “win-win” outcome possible in human rights disputes? What are examples of negotiation strategies and communication techniques that can lead to better outcomes during mediation?\nWhat information should be included in a settlement agreement?\nWhat factors should parties consider before suggesting or entering into a non-disclosure agreement (“NDA”) as part of a settlement? Are NDAs appropriate for human rights disputes?\n\nBreak: 10:20 – 10:40 am \n\nPanel 5 - Complex Accommodations: Neurodiversity\, substance use\, chronic absenteeism\, and more - 10:40 – 11:40 am\n\n\n \nJessica Fairbairn\nEmployer Counsel\nHarris & Co. \n\n\n \nRyan Goldvine\nArbitrator and Mediator\nGoldvine Dispute Resolution Services\nMember\nBC Human Rights Tribunal \n\n\n \nCaitlin Meggs\nUnion Counsel\nVictory Square Law Office LLP \n\n\nThis panel will explore how employers can identify and respond to accommodation needs in complex situations\, manage attendance and performance concerns fairly and consistently\, and determine the scope and limits of accommodation over time. Panelists will address key questions\, including: \nNeurodivergence: \n\nWhat does the term “neurodivergent” include? What are similarities and differences between learning disabilities\, ADHD\, and Autistic Spectrum Disorders (“ASD”)? What can be done to combat stereotypes affecting the inclusion and accommodation of neurodivergent employees and those with mental health issues in the workplace?\nWhat type of medical information can employers request from neurodivergent employees seeking accommodation\, g. a neuropsychological or psychoeducational evaluation?\n\nMental Health: \n\nWhat accommodations would be most helpful for employees with the following:\n\nLearning disabilities\nASD\nMental health disorders and conditions (i.e. bipolar disorder\, depression\, anxiety)\n\n\nWhat signs may indicate that an employee has a mental health condition or other condition that requires accommodation or support? What are more acute signs of immediate distress versus more subtle signs that an employee may be struggling?\nWhen does the employer have a ‘duty to inquire’ whether an employee is affected by a mental health condition or disability that is causing misconduct in the workplace?\n\nSubstance Use: \n\nWhat guidance does recent case law provide on accommodating substance use disorders in the workplace?\n\nAbsenteeism: \n\nWhat are the components of an Attendance Management Program that addresses the accommodation of an employee’s disability-related absenteeism?\nCan an employee insist on remote work as a form of health-related accommodation? Does an employee’s susceptibility to contracting an illness at the workplace warrant accommodation? What is the type and scope of medical information that is required to support these requests?\nHow should employers and unions address increased absenteeism due to RTO? Are there working options that help improve attendance?\nWhat guidance does recent case law offer on when absenteeism moves beyond reasonable accommodation and into undue hardship?\nHow does the test for ‘undue hardship’ vary in different safety sensitive industries with respect to substance addiction issues or other issues that may pose safety risks in the workplace?\n\nNetworking lunch: 11:40 – 12:40 pm \n\nPanel 6 - Shining a Light on Investigations: Expert guidance\, best practices\, recent caselaw - 12:40 – 1:55 pm\n\n\n \nShelley Ball\nLawyer and InvestigatorShelsu Pacific Law \n\n\n \nSandra Guarascio\nEmployer CounselRoper Greyell LLP \n\n\n \nDr. Nicole Legg\nLicensed PsychologistCo-Founder of WellIntel Inc. \n\n\n \nDavid Tarasoff\nUnion CounselHospital Employees Union \n\n\nInvestigating allegations of human rights violations in the workplace requires a commitment to understanding best practices\, including adopting a trauma-informed approach. Drawing on recent caselaw and best practices\, experts will offer insights into conducting or overseeing workplace investigations in the human rights context. Panelists will address the following questions: \n\nWhat is a trauma-informed approach? What steps can investigators take to ensure workplace human rights investigations are trauma informed?\nWhat measures should employers and investigators implement to support the mental well-being of participants during a workplace investigation and protect them from reprisal? Does the union play a role in supporting mental well-being?\nHow should employers\, unions\, and investigators proactively identify and remove accessibility barriers\, as well as provide accommodations\, during workplace investigations?\nIn what circumstances is hiring an external investigator preferred over an internal investigation? How can the parties strike a balance between thoroughness and urgency during investigations?\nWhat information can be shared with a complainant or respondent once an investigation is complete? How can employers communicate investigation results to complainants in a way that does not harm their mental health?\nMust an employer investigate a human rights allegation even in the absence of a formal complaint? How should anonymous complaints be investigated?\nWhat risks arise from failing to investigate an allegation? In what situations have damages been awarded for an employer’s failure to investigate a human rights allegation?\nWhat obligations do investigators have to disclose their report to the parties? What entitlement do the parties have to disclosure?\nWhat comes next after a workplace investigation? What does an effective workplace restoration process entail?\n\n  \nBreak: 1:55 – 2:15 pm \n\nPanel 7 - Uses and Abuses of Modern Technology: A scenario-based session on social media\, employee monitoring\, and AI - 2:15 – 3:45 pm\n\n\n \nJessica Gregory\nArbitrator\, Mediator and Investigator \n\n\n \nPreston Parsons\nEmployer Counsel\nOverholt LLP \n\n\n \nKaren Segal\nAllevato Quail & Associates \n\n\nThis session will provide employers and unions with the best available insight into AI-driven management decisions\, employee surveillance\, and social media. Experienced management and union counsel will join an arbitrator to discuss three hypothetical scenerios relating to AI management\, social media use\, and surveillance. \nSpecific issues to be addressed include: \n\nWhat is the current role of AI-driven tools in management decision-making\, and how is that role expected to evolve in the future?\nIn what circumstances can an employer dismiss an employee for inappropriate social media posts? Where is the line between free speech and offensive speech?\nHow are employers and unions addressing the use of algorithmic management in collective agreements?\nDo employees have to disclose usage of AI?\nWhat arguments for and against the use of algorithmic management will arbitrators find most compelling?\nWhat arguments for and against the use of employee surveillance have arbitrators accepted or rejected?\nWhat legal concerns arise when an employer uses AI to assess candidates’ suitability for positions?\n\nClosing remarks: 3:45 – 3:55 pm \n\nFood and Beverages \nBreakfast and lunch to be provided\, with a variety of snacks and refreshments available during breaks. Breakfast is provided prior to the workshop and will be available starting at 8:00 am. Please share any dietary requirements at the time of registration so we can best accommodate your needs. \n\nPricing \nB.C. Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Both Days \n$1\,995.00Add to cart	\n			\n  \n\nB.C. Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Day 1 \n$1\,195.00Add to cart	\n			\n  \n\nB.C. Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Day 2 \n$1\,195.00Add to cart	\n			\n  \n\nAttendees can also register for a skills training workshop offered by our Centre for Labour Relations Training & Development\, taking place the day after the conference. The workshop includes panel discussions and hands-on scenarios addressing real workplace human rights challenges and is designed to complement the BC Human Rights and Accommodation Conference. The conference and workshop may be attended separately or as a bundled registration: \n\nB.C. Human Rights and Accommodation Conference & Workshop – Bundle (Conference + Workshop) $2\,690.00Add to cart	\n			\n  \n\nConference Co-Chairs \n\n\n \nJonathan Chapnick\nMember\nBC Human Rights Tribunal \n\n\n \nSara Hanson\nUnion Counsel\nMoore Edgar Lyster LLP \n\n\n \nKristen Woo\nLegal Counsel\nBC Public School Employers’ Association \n\n\n\nAdvisory Committee \n\n\n \nKaity Cooper\nVice-Chair\nB.C. Labour Relations Board \n\n\n \nPeter Eastwood\nUnion Counsel\nHamilton Howell Bain & Gould \n\n\n \nJaime Hoopes\nEmployer Counsel\nRoper Greyell LLP \n\n\n \nLaura Track\nDirector of Human Rights Clinic\nDirector of Public Legal Education\nCommunity Legal Assistance Society (CLAS) \n\n\n \nMegan Tweedie\nDirector\nHuman Rights Office\nSimon Fraser University \n\n\n\nCPD \nConference Day 1\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.42 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 5.42 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nConference Day 2\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/b-c-human-rights-and-accommodation-conference/
LOCATION:Pan Pacific Hotel Vancouver\, 999 Canada Pl #300\, Vancouver\, British Columbia\, V6C 3B5\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Conference,Labour Law & Labour Policy
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/B.C.-Human-Rights-and-Accommodation-Conference-a.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR