BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Lancaster House - ECPv6.15.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Lancaster House
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lancasterhouse.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Lancaster House
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240215T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240215T140000
DTSTAMP:20260422T075700
CREATED:20231103T140935Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240130T160751Z
UID:11247-1708000200-1708005600@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Asset or Adversary? Examining AI’s impact on work and labour relations
DESCRIPTION:Moderator\n\n \nGeorge Filliter\nArbitrator and Mediator\nFilliter Arbitration and Mediation Services Inc. \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nDonald Jordan\nEmployer Counsel\nHarris & Company \n\n\n \nPeter Lewis\nCanada Research Chair\, Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence\nAssociate Professor\, Computer Science\nOntario Tech University \n\n\n \nTrent Snikkers\nBilingual National Representative\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) \n\n\nIn this webinar\, a panel of experts will explore the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the world of work and the implications for labour relations: \n\nAre concerns about AI’s impact on work overblown? Is this technological advance really different from previous technological revolutions that raised similar concerns about unemployment and the dehumanization of work?\nWhat aspects of work are most likely to be affected by AI? Is replacement of workers the only concern? Is encroachment upon employee privacy also of concern?\nWill human resources be taken over by “algorithmic management\,” e.g. filtering applications for employment\, assessing employee performance\, making decisions regarding termination of employment?\nWill AI take over labour relations tasks such as writing policies\, interpreting contract language\, drafting grievances\, researching law\, formulating arguments based on precedent\, or even deciding the outcome of grievances?\nWhat privacy issues are raised by the introduction of new AI technologies into the workplace? What lessons can be learned from recent arbitration decisions?\nHow should parties address concerns about work intensification related to AI?\nHow can workplace parties use AI to render it an “asset” while avoiding the drawbacks that may render it an “adversary”?\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Category A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Substantive Hours; 0 Professionalism Hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nCPD for Members of the Law Society of Ontario: 1.5 Substantive Hours; 0 Professionalism Hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/asset-or-adversary-examining-ais-impact-on-work-and-labour-relations/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/asset-or-adversary.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR