BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Lancaster House - ECPv6.15.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Lancaster House
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lancasterhouse.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Lancaster House
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240229T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240229T140000
DTSTAMP:20260422T005915
CREATED:20231103T141301Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240227T182630Z
UID:11249-1709209800-1709215200@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Shaken to the Core: When will a breach of trust justify termination?
DESCRIPTION:Moderator\n\n \nPaul Love\nArbitrator and Mediator \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nChristine Poirier\nSenior Advisor to General Counsel and Chief of Labour Relations and Special Projects Officer\nProfessional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) \n\n\n \nTwila Reid\nEmployer Counsel\nStewart McKelvey \n\n\nWhat happens when trust is broken in the workplace? What kind of conduct is considered to rise to the level of breach of trust\, and when will it be cause for dismissal? In this session\, experts will examine breach of trust in the workplace\, addressing: \n\nWhat constitutes a “breach of trust”? What types of conduct will rise to this threshold?\nDo employees have a duty to avoid conflicts of interest? Does this duty differ in the public and private sectors? What types of situations have arbitrators found pose conflicts of interest?\nWhat evidence is required to prove that an employee has engaged in conduct that rose to the level of a breach of trust? What is the requisite standard of proof?\nWhat are the consequences of a breach of trust? When is progressive discipline required\, and when will a breach of trust be so severe that proceeding directly to termination of employment is warranted? Do different positions and/or workplaces attract differing standards of trust?\nWhat factors do arbitrators\, courts\, and adjudicators typically consider when assessing the appropriate disciplinary penalty for a breach of trust? When may damages in lieu of reinstatement be considered?What factors may be taken into consideration when deciding whether an employment relationship is reparable?\nWill an employee’s remorse or willingness to account for their wrongdoing lead to a different disciplinary outcome? What mitigating factors should unions and employee-side representatives point to in order to support a lesser penalty?\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Category A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Substantive Hours; 0 Professionalism Hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nCPD for Members of the Law Society of Ontario: 1.5 Substantive Hours; 0 Professionalism Hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/shaken-to-the-core-when-will-a-breach-of-trust-justify-termination/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/shaken-to-the-core.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR