BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Lancaster House - ECPv6.15.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lancasterhouse.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Lancaster House
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20260101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260115T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260115T140000
DTSTAMP:20260422T213142
CREATED:20250825T161206Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260112T174019Z
UID:17433-1768480200-1768485600@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:2026 Annual Labour Law Update: The latest cases and legislative developments
DESCRIPTION:$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n  \nStay up to date on the latest developments in labour law through this comprehensive webinar addressing noteworthy cases and legislative updates from the past year. Panelists will examine key updates from across the country\, addressing questions such as: \n\nWhat is the status of ongoing legal challenges to the federal government’s recent use of s. 107 of the Canada Labour Code to intervene in strike actions? How might courts balance the competing interests and legal rights at stake\, and how does the Charter of Rights (the “Charter“) impact this analysis? In light of the response of labour relations parties and the public to the use of s. 107\, is future use of the provision likely?\nWhat aspects of an electronic monitoring policy will render the policy reasonable or unenforceable?\nWhat is the dividing line between workplace harassment and workplace violence?\nWhat do recent cases suggest about the point in time when an employer’s duty to investigate a harassment complaint is triggered? Will creating a solicitor-client relationship with a lawyer hired to conduct a workplace investigation render that investigation unfair?\nWhat trends are emerging in recent discipline and discharge cases? What factors have arbitrators considered in recent cases when determining whether to uphold discipline imposed for inappropriate off-duty use of social media by employees?\nCan employers discipline employees who refuse to undergo a medical examination? How should employers and unions respond when an employee objects to an independent medical examination report?\nCan an employer ban off-duty cannabis use for employees who work in safety-sensitive positions? Under what circumstances can employers require employees to undergo testing for substance use?\nWhen will the Charter apply to organizations in the broader public sector (for example\, a school board or regional health authority)?\nWhat noteworthy federal and provincial legislative initiatives have recently been introduced? For example:\n\nWhat measures have been introduced at a federal and provincial level in response to the trade conflict between Canada and the US?\nWhat federal guidance has been provided regarding Canada’s supply chain transparency legislation? How does the multi-jurisdictional “International Reporting on Modern Slavery\, Forced Labour and Child Labour” template and guidance\, created in cooperation between Canada\, Australia\, and the United Kingdom\, fit with obligations under the federal supply chain legislation?\nWhich jurisdiction provides the most paid days’ for sick leave or emergency family leave?\nWhat changes have been implemented through the latest installments of the Ontario government’s Working for Workers series of legislation?\nWhich provinces have recently introduced or passed legislation restricting employers’ right to ask for doctor’s notes in support of short-term sick leave?\nHow far does recent Quebec legislation expand government authority to restrict or end lawful strikes and lock-outs and refer labour disputes to interest arbitration? What is the status of the legal challenge commenced in response to this legislation?\n\n\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the webinar\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy topics in a shifting legal landscape. \nModerator\n\n \nDavid Mombourquette\nChairperson\nNew Brunswick Labour and Employment Board \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nPreston Parsons\nEmployer counsel\nOverholt LLP \n\n\n \nRuthie Wellen\nUnion counsel\nKastner Ko LLP \n\n\nAccreditation \nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \nThis program has been approved for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA). \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/2026-annual-labour-law-update-the-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/2026-Annual-Labour-Law-Update-The-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR