BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Lancaster House - ECPv6.15.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lancasterhouse.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Lancaster House
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Halifax
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0300
TZNAME:ADT
DTSTART:20240310T060000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0300
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:AST
DTSTART:20241103T050000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0300
TZNAME:ADT
DTSTART:20250309T060000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0300
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:AST
DTSTART:20251102T050000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/St_Johns
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0330
TZOFFSETTO:-0230
TZNAME:NDT
DTSTART:20240310T053000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0230
TZOFFSETTO:-0330
TZNAME:NST
DTSTART:20241103T043000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20250309T100000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20251102T090000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Halifax:20241028T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Halifax:20241028T160000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020105
CREATED:20240111T173330Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240730T163441Z
UID:11819-1730118600-1730131200@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Grievance Arbitration Police Services Workshop: Current trends\, contested issues
DESCRIPTION:Speakers\n\n \nChris Albertyn\nArbitrator \n\n\n \nTom Roper K.C.\nLabour Relations Counsel \n\n\n \nNini Jones\nLabour Relations Counsel \n\n\nMonday\, October 28\, 2024This session on grievance arbitration in the police services sector across Canada will be conducted by an experienced arbitrator together with leading union and management counsel. \nPanelists will explore recent decisions relating to current issues including the following: \n\nDischarge and discipline\nBenefits and benefit-related issues\nHuman rights and discrimination\nWorkplace harassment\nDisability and accommodation\nPrivacy and privacy-related issues / medical information\nSick leave and other leaves of absence\nMinimum staffing\, etc.\nTransfer and promotion\nAlcohol and drug addiction\nOff-duty conduct\nMandatory vaccination\nIndemnity for legal costs\nJurisdiction of arbitrators vs. human rights and police service appeal tribunals\n\nAttendees can expect to be updated on cases involving the principles of collective agreement interpretation\, including the following: \n\n“Plain meaning” rule / ambiguity\nContextual evidence of negotiating history\nEstoppel\nStatutory freeze issues\nThe requirements of good faith\nFairness and management rights\nRelevance of statute law\nReasons and judicial review\n\nThe emphasis will be on practical advice. Up-to-date materials will be provided with case summaries\, overviews and analyses prepared by Lancaster’s legal staff. \nWho should attend? The program is designed for: \n\nHR directors\, professionals and executives\nPolice chiefs\nUnion officers\, representatives and advocates\nGrievance advisors and committee members\nLabour lawyers/consultants\nArbitrators\, mediators and adjudicators\nDeputy police chiefs\n\nCPDWorkshop CPD\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n \n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 3.5 hours under Category A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCPD for Members of the Law Society of Ontario: 3.5 Substantive Hours; 0 Professionalism Hours.\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Colombia for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may count this program for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n 
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/grievance-arbitration-police-services-workshop-current-trends-contested-issues/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Conference,Workshop
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/grievance-arbitration-police-services-2024-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20241105T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20241105T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020105
CREATED:20240709T195137Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250213T170627Z
UID:14135-1730809800-1730815200@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Compliance and Compassion: Providing representation while accommodating disabilities and meeting professional obligations
DESCRIPTION:Moderator\n\n \nSarah Atkinson\nArbitrator/Mediator \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nShannon Carson\nUnion Counsel\nMyers LLP \n\n\n \nMichael Horvat\nEmployer Counsel\nAird & Berlis LLP \n\n\nIn this webinar\, expert panelists will explore best practices for legal practitioners and labour relations professionals when representing employees who may present as “difficult to work with” (e.g. combative\, non-responsive\, or invested in their matter to an above-average degree) in internal complaints\, grievance or arbitration procedures\, or other proceedings\, outlining practical guidance for providing compassionate representation while meeting legal and regulatory obligations. Topics to be addressed include: \n\nWhat key rules of professional conduct establish legal practitioners’ obligations when representing grievors or complainants? When engaging with a grievor or complainant on behalf of an employer? What legal duties apply to union representatives?\nHow can parties distinguish a “vexatious” grievor or complainant from an individual who simply needs additional support? Is there any mechanism through which “vexatious” matters can be addressed on a preliminary basis?\nHow should legal practitioners and labour relations professionals respond when\, in the course of representing a grievor or complainant\, that individual:\n\nIs combative or hostile toward the representative or others?\nIs non-responsive?\nAppears excessively invested in the matter\, repeatedly contacting the representative\, the employer\, or others?\nAppear to have a diminished capacity to make decisions?\n\n\nHow may an employee’s disability impact how they engage with their representative and others? What signs may indicate that an employee has a mental health condition or other disability impacting their conduct? How should legal practitioners and labour relations professionals respond and what legal duties are engaged in this context?\nHow might trauma\, cultural factors\, or previous experiences of discrimination impact the manner in which an individual acts throughout a complaint or grievance? How might trauma-informed and intersectional approaches assist?\nHow can legal practitioners and labour relations professionals ensure that their own biases do not impact the manner in which they represent or engage with employees?\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\nThis program contains 0 hour(s) and 45 minutes of Professionalism Content.\n\n\n\n\nThis program contains 0 hour(s) and 45 minutes of EDI Professionalism Content.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/compliance-and-compassion-providing-representation-while-accommodating-disabilities-and-meeting-professional-obligations/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/compliance-and-compassion.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241107
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241109
DTSTAMP:20260404T020105
CREATED:20240405T142415Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241108T154828Z
UID:13007-1730937600-1731110399@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Edmonton Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector Conference
DESCRIPTION:Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nTeresa Haykowsky\nEmployer Counsel\nMcLennan Ross LLP \n\n\n \nPatrick Nugent\nUnion Counsel\nNugent Law Office \n\n\nWestin Edmonton - Discounted Room\n$229/night\nDeadline: Tuesday\, October 8\, 2024 \nCall 1 (800) 937-8461 to book your reservation \nMore InformationConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nKim Leblanc\nChief Negotiator\nAlberta Health Services (AHS) \n\n\n \nJim Petrie\nDirector of Labour Relations\nAlberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) \n\n\n \nDeborah Schaan\nGeneral VP North\nLocal 417\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Alberta Division \n\n\n \nKent Sorochuk\nSenior Negotiator\nCity of Edmonton \n\n\nThursday\, November 7\, 2024Workshop sold separately from stand-alone conference. \n\n\n\n\n\nTime\nSchedule\n\n\n\n\nBreakfast\n8:00 am – 9:00 am PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n9:00 am – 10:25 am PT\n\n\nMorning Break\n10:25 am – 10:40 am PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n10:40 am – 12:00 pm PT\n\n\nLunch\n12:00 pm – 1:00 pm PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n1:00 pm – 2:20 pm PT\n\n\nAfternoon Break\n2:10 pm – 2:25 pm PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n2:25 pm – 4:00 pm PT\n\n\nWorkshop Ends\n4:00 pm PT\n\n\n\n\nWorkshop - Rethinking Bargaining Basics: Costing benefits\, crafting language\, creating innovative clauses\n\n\n \nGabriel Joshee-Arnal\nEmployer Counsel\nNeuman Thompson \n\n\n \nKate Robinson\nNegotiator\nAlberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) \n\n\nIn this workshop\, experts will guide participants through bargaining processes\, with a focus on the importance of costing and collective agreement language. Attendees will hear panel discussions and work through realistic scenarios\, gaining the skills necessary to: \n\nApply current approaches in costing a collective agreement;\nUnderstand the application of the concept of total compensation;\nFormulate clear and compelling contract language; and\nDevelop innovative clauses to address current workplace challenges.\n\nFriday\, November 8\, 2024Breakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am MT \nIntroduction: 9:00 am – 9:05 am MT \nPanel 1 - Reading the Vital Signs: Economic checkup for Alberta 2024-2025 - 9:05 am – 10:00 am MT\n\n\n \nRichard Hyndman\nResearch Officer\nAlberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) \n\n\n \nCatherine Rothrock\nChief Economist\nAlberta Treasury Board and Finance \n\n\nWhat are economists forecasting for 2025? In this session\, expert economists will examine 2025 economic and fiscal forecasts in Alberta and federally. Specifically\, the panel will address: \n\nWhat short- and long-term economic trends are experts predicting Canadians will experience in 2025 in Alberta and in Canada generally?\nHow does the Alberta economic outlook compare to other provinces and the United States?\nAre inflation and cost-of-living projected to increase in 2025?\nWhat is the status of the Alberta labour market and how does it compare with the labour market federally? Were more jobs gained or lost in 2024? What is the outlook for employment status in 2025?\nWhat measures are governments likely to prioritize in 2025 provincial and federal budgets to promote economic growth and prosperity?\n\nBreak: 10:00 am – 10:15 am MT \nPanel 2 - From Economic Realities to Bargaining Strategies: Experts provide guidance - 10:15 am – 11:30 am MT\n\n\n \nJames Casey\nArbitrator/Mediator\nLabour Arbitration + Mediation \n\n\n \nTricia Gibbs\nLabour Relations Officer\nUnited Nurses of Alberta (UNA) \n\n\n \nCraig Neuman\nEmployer Counsel\nNeuman Thompson \n\n\nIn this session\, expert panelists will explore the implications of the economic and fiscal climate for bargaining\, focusing on settlements and awards\, and addressing questions such as: \n\nHow has the rise in the rate of inflation seen throughout the pandemic been addressed at the bargaining table? Beyond general wage increases\, what wage adjustment measures are being negotiated?\nIs inflation’s deleterious effect on workers’ purchasing power the main driver behind recent rejections of tentative agreements\, or is something else at play?\nHas there been a rise in employer-sought “rollbacks” at the bargaining table?\nHow is the recent reported decline in inflation expected to impact wage demands? Will demands moderate or remain high due to low consumer confidence and high household costs relating to essentials\, mortgages\, and/or rent?\nHow are concerns about productivity and the standard of living likely to be reflected at the bargaining table?\nWhat key non-monetary demands are emerging at the bargaining table in the current climate?\n\nBreak: 11:30 am – 11:45 am MT \nFireside Chat - What’s New at the Board? - 11:45 am – 12:30 pm MT\n\n\n \nTeresa Haykowsky\nEmployer Counsel\nMcLennan Ross LLP \n\n\n \nNancy Schlesinger\nChair and Essential Services Commissioner\nAlberta Labour Relations Board (ALRB) \n\n\nNetworking Lunch: 12:30 pm – 1:15 pm MT \nPanel 3 - Recent Developments and Their Impact on Negotiations: Freedom of association; unfair labour practices; ban on strike replacements; remote work; and more - 1:15 pm – 2:30 pm MT\n\n\n \nPaulette DeKelver\nMediation/Arbitration \n\n\n \nBill Rigutto\nUnion Rep\nAlberta Union of Provincial Employees \n\n\n \nRebecca Silverberg\nEmployer Counsel\nMcLennan Ross LLP \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will examine recent decisions\, legislative changes\, and other developments impacting bargaining in the public sector. Final topics will be selected in the weeks prior to the conference to ensure coverage of the latest and most important developments. Topics currently include: \n\nThe impact of recent court decisions concerning freedom of association and the legality of legislation restricting collective bargaining processes and outcomes;\nThe impact of recent arbitral awards\, including interest arbitration decisions addressing inflation and staffing/recruitment issues;\nThe impact of recent labour board decisions addressing issues such as unfair labour practices\, statutory freeze violations\, and picketing in a remote work context;\nThe impact of recent legislative initiatives including:\n\nFederal legislation to ban the use of strike replacement workers; and\nProvincial legislation regarding government oversight and coordination of non-union public sector compensation;\n\n\nRecent noteworthy settlements and strike actions; and\nCurrent workplace trends\, including artificial intelligence\, remote work\, the right to disconnect\, etc.\n\nBreak: 2:30 pm – 2:45 pm MT \nPanel 4 - Tackling Turnover: Addressing recruitment and retention at the bargaining table - 2:45 pm – 4:00 pm MT\n\n\n \nAdam Cembrowski\nUnion Counsel\nNugent Law Office \n\n\n \nJodi Edmunds\nDirector Employee & Labour Relations\nNorthern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT) \n\n\n \nLisa Mason\nNational Representative\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) \n\n\n \nAdam Norget\nDirector\, HR Legal Services & Legal Counsel\nHuman Resources Division\nEdmonton Police Service \n\n\nWorkplace conditions can affect organizational health\, employee satisfaction\, employee performance\, and turnover.  This panel will examine important considerations for addressing recruitment and retention at the bargaining table. Experts will discuss: \n\nEmerging collective agreement language regarding benefits and leaves;\nParticular work arrangements that enhance work-life balance;\nWork from home or hybrid work arrangements;\nMeans for improving employee mental health and minimizing burnout or undue stress; and\nThe potential for unions to act as hiring halls to supply staff to nursing homes and retirement homes\n\nClosing remarks: 4:00 pm MT \nCPDConference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nThis program qualifies for 5.5 CPD hours under the Law Society of Saskatchewan Continuing Professional Development Policy\n\n\n\nWorkshop CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nThis program qualifies for 5.5 CPD hours under the Law Society of Saskatchewan Continuing Professional Development Policy
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/edmonton-bargaining-in-the-broader-public-sector-conference-2024/
LOCATION:Westin Edmonton\, 10135 100th Street\, Edmonton\, Alberta\, T5J 0N7\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector Conference,Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/portrait/psb-header.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241119
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241122
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240304T160642Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241120T181121Z
UID:12506-1731974400-1732233599@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Vancouver Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector and Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference
DESCRIPTION:Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector ConferenceCo-chairs\n\n \nAnthony (Tony) Glavin\nUnion Counsel\nKoskie Glavin Gordon \n\n\n \nAdriana Wills\nEmployer Counsel\nHarris & Company LLP \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nAshkon Hashemi\nSenior Member Services Officer\, Labour Relations\nUBC Association of Administrative and Professional Staff \n\n\n \nJeanne Meyers\nExecutive Director and General Counsel\nHealth Sciences Association of British Columbia (HSABC) \n\n\n \nDelayne Sartison\nEmployer Counsel\nRoper Greyell LLP \n\n\n \nJay Sharun\nChief Executive Officer\nNational Collective Bargaining Institute \n\n\nLabour Arbitration and Policy ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nJennifer Glougie\nChair\nBC Labour Relations Board (BCLRB) \n\n\n \nEric Ito\nEmployer Counsel\nCooperwilliams Truman & Ito LLP \n\n\n \nTamara Ramusovic\nUnion Counsel\nMoore Edgar Lyster LLP \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nKaity Cooper\nGeneral Counsel\nHospital Employees’ Union (HEU) \n\n\n \nHeather Hettiarachchi\nEmployer Counsel\nIntegritas Workplace Law \n\n\n \nKevin Jeske\nAssociate Vice-President\, Human Resources\nUniversity of the Fraser Valley \n\n\nTuesday\, November 19\, 2024Workshop*Workshop sold separately from stand-alone conference. \n\n\n\n\n\nTime\nSchedule\n\n\n\n\nBreakfast\n8:00 am – 9:00 am PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n9:00 am – 10:25 am PT\n\n\nMorning Break\n10:25 am – 10:40 am PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n10:40 am – 12:00 pm PT\n\n\nLunch\n12:00 pm – 1:00 pm PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n1:00 pm – 2:20 pm PT\n\n\nAfternoon Break\n2:20 pm – 2:35 pm PT\n\n\nWorkshop\n2:35 pm – 4:00 pm PT\n\n\nWorkshop Ends\n4:00 pm PT\n\n\n\n\nBargaining In The Broader Public Sector Conference WorkshopAdvanced Skills in Bargaining: Overcoming roadblocks\, costing benefits\, crafting language\n\n\n \nMichael Conlon\nExecutive Director\nFederation for Post-Secondary Educators of BC (FPSE) \n\n\n \nRyan Goldvine\nMediator/Arbitrator\nGoldvine Dispute Resolution Services \nPart-Time Member\nBC Employment Standards Tribunal \n\n\n \nJohn Rogers\nUnion Counsel\nVictory Square Law Office \n\n\nIn this interactive\, full-day workshop\, experts will help participants hone their bargaining skills\, with a focus on overcoming negotiation challenges\, determining the cost of benefits\, and crafting collective agreement language. By examining both employer and union-side perspectives and delving into case scenarios\, attendees will gain expertise necessary to determine the cost of benefits\, including intangible benefits such as wellness programs\, and craft clear\, compelling\, and innovative collective agreement language. \nWednesday\, November 20\, 2024Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector ConferenceBreakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am PT \nOpening Remarks: 9:00 am – 9:05 am PT \nPanel 1 - Checking the Fiscal Forecast: Bargaining in B.C.’s current economic environment - 9:05 am – 10:20 am PT\n\n\n \nJames Johnson\nAssociate Professor\, Economics\nUniversity of British Columbia (UBC) \nMember and Chief Negotiator\,\nUBC Faculty Association Bargaining Team \n\n\n \nJeff Marwick\nDirector\, Regional Employers Services\nMetro Vancouver \n\n\n \nKevin Milligan\nProfessor and Director\, Vancouver School of Economics\nUniversity of British Columbia (UBC) \n\n\n \nJim Stanford\nEconomist and Director\nCentre for Future Work \n\n\nIn this session\, expert panelists will explore 2025 economic and fiscal forecasts and their implications for bargaining\, focusing on settlements and awards\, and addressing questions such as: \n\nWhat short- and long-term economic trends are experts predicting Canadians will experience in 2025 in British Columbia? Canada? The United States?\nAre inflation and cost-of-living projected to increase in 2025?\n How has the increase of the British Columbia minimum wage to $17.40 impacted bargaining? How will it impact future bargaining?\n What key non-monetary demands are emerging at the bargaining table in the current climate?\n What measures are governments likely to prioritize in 2025 provincial and federal budgets to promote economic growth and prosperity?\n\nBreak: 10:20 am – 10:35 am PT \nPanel 2 - Breaking Barriers\, Achieving Balance: Addressing retention and EDI at the bargaining table - 10:35 am – 11:45 am PT\n\n\n \nLeanne Anderson\nMember Services Officer\, Advocacy\nUBC Association of Administrative and Professional Staff \n\n\n \nTheo Arsenault\nUnion Counsel\nArsenault Aaron Lawyers \n\n\n \nRyan Copeland\n\n\n \nMaynard A. Witvoet\nAssociate Director\, People Relations\nVancouver Community College (VCC) \n\n\nAddressing Equity\, Diversity\, and Inclusion (EDI) at the bargaining table is critical for complying with legal requirements\, cultivating workplaces that nurture diverse talents\, and enhancing organizational culture. In this panel\, experts will provide guidance on building a more equitable workplace through collective bargaining\, addressing the following: \n\nWhat steps should unions and employers take to identify equity issues in the workplace? What information should be gathered in preparation for bargaining on these issues?\nWhat questions should guide unions and employers in reviewing collective agreements and bargaining proposals through an equity lens?\nHow might existing collective agreement language and definitions be written or revised to ensure that they are equitable and inclusive?\nHow can unions and employers measure the effectiveness of negotiated programs or provisions on equity issues?\n\nBreak: 11:45 am – 12:00 pm PT \nFireside Chat with Vincent Ready - 12:00 pm – 12:30 pm PT\n\n\n \nVince Ready\nArbitrator/Mediator \n\n\nLunch: 12:30 pm – 1:25 pm PT \nPanel 3 - Rapid Refresher: Key cases\, legislative changes\, and their impact on negotiations - 1:25 pm – 2:35 pm PT\n\n\n \nJessica Gregory\nArbitrator/Mediator/Investigator \n\n\n \nDelayne Sartison\nEmployer Counsel\nRoper Greyell LLP \n\n\n \nMichael Shapiro\nUnion Counsel\nHastings Labour Law Office LLP \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will examine recent decisions\, legislative changes\, and other developments impacting bargaining in the public sector. Final topics will be selected in the weeks prior to the conference to ensure coverage of the latest and most important developments. Topics currently include: \n\nThe impact of recent court decisions concerning freedom of association and the legality of legislation restricting collective bargaining;\nThe impact of recent arbitral awards\, including grievance arbitration decisions addressing key principles of collective agreement interpretation;\nThe impact of recent labour board decisions addressing issues such as unfair labour practices\, illegal strikes\, good faith bargaining\, and statutory freeze violations;\nRecent legislative initiatives including:\n\nFederal legislation to ban the use of strike replacement workers; and\nC.’s ongoing review of the Labour Relations Code;\n\n\nRecent noteworthy settlements and strike actions; and\nCurrent workplace trends\, including privatization\, remote work\, and the right to disconnect.\n\nBreak: 2:35 pm – 2:50 pm PT \nPanel 4 - Tech Talks: Addressing technological change\, surveillance\, monitoring\, and AI at the bargaining table - 2:50 pm – 4:00 pm PT\n\n\n \nGraeme Johnston\nSenior Labour Relations Officer\nHealth Sciences Association of BC (HSABC) \n\n\n \nSuzanne Kennedy\nEmployer Counsel\nHarris & Company LLP \n\n\n \nOludolapo Makinde\nPhD Candidate\nUniversity of British Columbia (UBC) \n\n\n \nTina-Marie Bradford\nStaff Representative\, Advocacy Department\nBC General Employees’ Union (BCGEU) \n\n\n \nJordan Michaux\nEmployer Counsel\nRoper Greyell LLP \n\n\nWorkplaces must ensure that their use of technology complies with existing laws relating to employee privacy and human rights\, while also grappling with new areas where the law has not yet been extensively developed – such as the use of artificial intelligence (AI). In this panel\, experts will examine how collective bargaining can be used to address the complex and wide-ranging issues emerging from using technology in the workplace. Panelists will explore: \n\nWhat current issues related to using technology in the workplace should employers and unions address at the bargaining table?\nWhat issues resulting from the use of AI in the workplace should be addressed through collective bargaining? What lessons can be learned from collective agreement language that has addressed past technological changes?\nWhat information is available to employers using AI\, monitoring\, and surveillance technologies? Are employees entitled to information about how their employer is using AI\, monitoring\, and surveillance technologies? How much say do unions and their members currently have in what employee information employers collect and how it is used?\nWhat specific risks do emerging technologies such as “algorithmic management” present for employees’ right to privacy and non-discrimination? How can collective bargaining be used to protect against these risks and address concerns of both employers and unions?\nHow have arbitrators treated the use of emerging monitoring and surveillance technologies intended to measure employee productivity? What lessons can be learned from these decisions when negotiating collective agreement language?\nDo employers have a right to conduct off-duty surveillance of employees? What limits exist on off-duty surveillance? How should these concerns be addressed through collective agreement language?\nWhat are some examples of collective agreement provisions addressing AI\, technology\, and employee privacy?\n\nClosing Remarks: 4:00 pm PT \nThursday\, November 21\, 2024Labour Arbitration and Policy ConferenceBreakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am PT \nOpening Remarks: 9:00 am – 9:05 am PT \nPanel 1 - Current and Critical: Experts examine recent cases and legislative developments - 9:05 am – 10:35 am PT\n\n\n \nCarolyn Janusz\nUnion Counsel\nGoodwin Law \n\n\n \nJitesh Mistry\nLabour Arbitrator/Mediator\nMistry ADR \n\n\n \nLindsie Thomson\nEmployer Counsel\nHarris & Company LLP \n\n\nIn this panel\, experts will address recent cases and legislative developments impacting federally and provincially regulated workplaces. \nPanelists will discuss the latest cases on the following topics: \n\nDiscipline and dismissal;\nDiscrimination\, harassment\, and accommodation;\nWorkplace investigations;\nPrivacy and computer access;\nRefusal to vaccinate;\nRemote work; and\nCollective bargaining and the right to strike.\n\nPanelists will also examine recent legislative initiatives: \n\nAn increase in B.C.’s minimum wage;\nAmendments to workers’ rights to strike under B.C.’s Labour Relations Code;\nEmployers’ and workers’ duties under B.C.’s Workers Compensation Act;\nGig workers’ rights in B.C.;\nEmployers’ obligations under the federal Accessible Canada Act; and\nChanges to the Canada Labour Code regarding termination and the “right to disconnect.”\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest developments. \nBreak: 10:35 am – 10:50 am PT \nPanel 2 - New Rules for Return to Work: The duty to cooperate and maintain employment under the Workers Compensation Act - 10:50 am – 11:45 am PT\n\n\n \nAmanda Alberti\nEmployer Counsel\nHarris \n\n\n \nJackie Christofferson\nCounsel\nWorksafeBC \n\n\n \nPeter Eastwood\nUnion Counsel\nHHBG Lawyers \n\n\n \nElise Kobylanski\nManager Client Services\nReturn to Work Services\nWorksafeBC \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will examine recent amendments to B.C.’s Workers Compensation Act which introduce a new “duty to cooperate” and “duty to maintain employment.” Speakers will address questions including: \n\nWhat new obligations are imposed on workplace parties under the “duty to cooperate” and “duty to maintain employment”? When and to whom do these duties apply?\nWhat changes should employers consider making to workplace policies in order to ensure compliance with these duties? What unique challenges may arise in fulfilling these duties in a unionized workplace? What role exists for unions in the implementation and enforcement of these duties?\nMust an employer or worker file a complaint with WorkSafeBC in order to trigger an investigation into the parties’ compliance with these duties? Or can WorkSafeBC initiate an investigation into parties’ compliance on its own initiative?\nWhere a breach of the duties has been alleged or is being investigated\, what rights do parties have to provide and receive information\, make submissions\, and challenge any determination reached?\nWhat consequences may follow if WorkSafeBC determines that a party has failed to comply with its obligations under these provisions?\nShould claims relating to an employee’s return to work be advanced through labour arbitration\, a human rights tribunal proceeding\, or through WorkSafeBC? Can parties expect to face procedural arguments that WorkSafeBC has exclusive jurisdiction over aspects of their claim?\n\nBreak: 11:45 am – 11:55 am PT \nKeynote by Dr. Chris Stewart-Patterson - Invisible Disability in the Workplace - 11:55 am – 12:30 pm PT\n\n\n \nDr. Chris Stewart-Patterson\nCME Program Director\nHarvard Medical School \n\n\nFibromyalgia\, chronic fatigue syndrome\, and increasingly long COVID (Post COVID-19 Condition) are medical conditions that can have significant impairment that is not obviously visible in the workplace. There are no definitive objective tests that can demonstrate the severity of these conditions\, so the question remains: how is impairment assessed in these conditions? If impairment is reliably established\, then\, if appropriate\, what are some reasonable accommodations that can result in greater workplace satisfaction\, attendance\, and productivity for individuals with these conditions? The presentation aims to discuss current evidence and approaches to both issues. \nLunch: 12:30 pm – 1:25 pm PT \nPanel 3 - Different Roads to Resolution: Conducting effective investigations or making the most of ADR - 1:25 pm – 2:30 pm PT\n\n\n \nHeather Hettiarachchi\nEmployer Counsel\nIntegritas Workplace Law \n\n\n \nDavid Louie\nLawyer and Workplace Investigator\nSouthern Butler Price LLP \n\n\n \nSonya Sabet-Rasekh\nStaff Representative\, Advocacy Department\,\nB.C. General Employees’ Union \n\n\nWhen an employee files a complaint alleging workplace discrimination\, harassment\, violence\, or other misconduct\, an employer may take multiple pathways — short of arbitration — to resolve the complaint and restore workplace health and safety. Employers should be aware of the pros and cons of each option. In this panel\, experts will explore: \n\nWhat is the difference between alternative dispute resolution (ADR)\, arbitration\, mediation\, and investigation?\nWhat makes an investigation effective?\nWhen is an employer’s duty to investigate triggered? What are the pros and cons of using ADR to resolve a complaint?\nWhat is the role of the union in these processes? What criteria should employers focus on when selecting an appropriate mediator\, ADR expert\, or investigator? When is it appropriate to use an internal versus an external investigator?\nWhat does it mean to ensure that investigations\, mediations\, and other forms of ADR are conducted through a trauma-informed lens? Does it help to promote employee health\, wellness\, and safety?\n\nBreak: 2:30 pm – 2:45 pm PT \nPanel 4 - Beliefs and Boundaries: Reconciling employee freedom of speech and legitimate employer concerns - 2:45 pm – 4:00 pm PT\n\n\n \nE. Murphy Fries\nUnion Counsel\nKoskie Glavin Gordon \n\n\n \nNajeeb Hassan\nAssociate Chair\, Adjudication and Mediation Division at the BCLRB \n\n\n \nJames Kondopulos\nEmployer Counsel\nRoper Greyell LLP \n\n\nHow can employers balance freedom of expression under the Charter with the need to maintain a productive and respectful workplace? In this session\, panelists will address: \n\nDo employees have the right to express their views on potentially controversial and/or political matters at work?\n What criteria should employers and unions consider when determining whether an employee’s speech or actions pose a legitimate concern to the organization’s reputation or operations? What actions should employers or unions take when employees’ expressions may border on being disrespectful or offensive\, but are not overtly harmful?\n Can employers monitor employee expressions outside the workplace or on social media? Can employers discipline employees for such expressions?\n What is the extent of a union’s duty to represent members who face work-related consequences for potentially polarizing beliefs or actions? When will a union’s decision not to represent a member constitute a breach of the duty of fair representation?\n How can employers and unions effectively communicate expectations regarding employee expression\, appropriate workplace conduct\, and appropriate off-work conduct?\n\nClosing Remarks: 4:00 pm PT \nCPDBargaining in the Broader Public Sector Conference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nMembers of the Law Society of British Colombia may count this program for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nLabour Arbitration and Policy Conference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nMembers of the Law Society of British Colombia may count this program for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nWorkshop CPD\n\n\nThe Post-Conference Workshops have been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThe Post-Conference Workshops have been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThe Post-Conference Workshops have been approved by the Law Society of British Colombia may count this program for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/vancouver-labour-arbitration-and-policy-conference-bargaining-in-the-broader-public-sector-conference/
LOCATION:The Hyatt Regency Vancouver\, 655 Burrard Street.\, Vancouver\, B.C.\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector Conference,Conference,Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/header/vancouver-header-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20241121T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20241121T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240709T195219Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241018T163015Z
UID:14137-1732192200-1732197600@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Attendance Management: Addressing issues raised by disabilities\, remote work\, childcare and elder care\, and absences due to illness and emergencies
DESCRIPTION:Moderator\n\n \nJames Cameron\nArbitrator/Mediator\nCameron Mediation Arbitration \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nChris Bryden\nUnion Counsel\nRyder Wright Blair & Holmes \n\n\n \nRoxana Jangi\nEmployer Counsel\nDentons Canada LLP \n\n\nEmployers often utilize attendance management programs (“AMPs”) to address employee absenteeism. How can AMPs be developed\, implemented\, and communicated to employees properly to ensure compliance with human rights laws\, privacy laws\, and employees’ rights under a collective agreement? In this webinar\, experts will explore: \n\nWhat is an AMP?\nHow can employers strike a balance between the need to ensure attendance at work and the duty to accommodate employees with disabilities? Should an AMP have special provisions for absences related to addiction\, alcoholism\, and other disabilities? How should AMPs be designed to address absences related to emergencies and family status\, including childcare and eldercare?\nWhat kind of medical information can employers require employees to provide under an AMP? Are consistent rules about required medical documentation appropriate or should the need for an employee’s medical information be considered on a case-by-case basis?\nHow should AMPs be implemented in hybrid or remote workplaces? What surveillance practices\, if any\, have arbitrators found objectionable?\nWhat elements should an AMP contain for it to withstand arbitral scrutiny for reasonableness? When can AMPS be deemed discriminatory or encroaching upon employees’ privacy rights? How should threshold levels of attendance at each stage of the program be set so that they are not arbitrary or unreasonable?\nWhat are best practices in communicating AMPs to employees? What role can workplace policies play in effectively communicating AMPs to employees?\nIs it a best practice to negotiate collective agreement provisions that address attendance management? Why or why not? What are some examples of attendance management clauses that unions and employers have included in collective agreements?\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/attendance-management-addressing-issues-raised-by-disabilities-remote-work-childcare-and-elder-care-and-absences-due-to-illness-and-emergencies/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/attendance-management-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20241125T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20241125T170000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240514T132931Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T165632Z
UID:13349-1732525200-1732554000@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Intensive Mediation Workshop
DESCRIPTION:In association with:Upon completion of this program\, participants will receive a digital credential from Toronto Metropolitan University. \n\n\n \nDaphne Taras\nProfessor and DirectorCentre for Labour-Management RelationsToronto Metropolitan University \n\n\nProgram Leader\n\n \nDaphne Taras\nProfessor and Director\nCentre for Labour-Management Relations\nToronto Metropolitan University \n\n\nProgram Faculty\n\n \nPaula Knopf\nArbitrator \n\n\nThis intensive professional learning program is designed to develop the advanced dispute resolution skills that labour relations professionals need in order to be successful in their roles. \nParticipants will have the opportunity to observe dispute resolution techniques used by experienced professional mediators — and to use those techniques as they attempt to resolve a workplace dispute. To make the simulation as realistic as possible\, actors will play the role of the aggrieved party. \nAimed at labour relations professionals with basic to intermediate knowledge of mediation and workplace dispute resolution techniques\, this session aims not to create professional mediators but to equip participants with the knowledge and skills necessary to: \n\nDefuse tensions and manage workplace conflict\nResolve grievances without resorting to lengthy and expensive arbitration processes\nMake effective use of informal and formal mediation as a management or union representative\n\nWho is this program designed for? \n\nGraduates of the Lancaster House–Toronto Metropolitan University Labour Relations Certificate Program\nLabour relations professionals with 3 or more years of experience working full-time for an employer or a union\, including:\n\nHuman resources professionals\nLabour relations officers\nLocal union leadership\nManagers\nUnion staff\n\n\nLabour and employment lawyers in their first 5 years of practice\n\nTo ensure interactivity as well as opportunities for skill-building and personalized feedback\, spaces in this program are extremely limited. We hope you’ll join us. \nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 6.5 hours under Category A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 6.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 6.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Colombia for 6.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nCPD for Members of the Law Society of Ontario: 6.5 Substantive Hours; 0 Professionalism Hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 6.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/intensive-mediation-workshop-summer-2024/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Professional Learning Program
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/header/TMU-header.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/St_Johns:20241126T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/St_Johns:20241127T160000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240620T174835Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241126T191514Z
UID:13689-1732611600-1732723200@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Effective Grievance Handling and Arbitration Advocacy: Intensive Training for Employers and Unions
DESCRIPTION:Facilitator\n\n \nChantelle MacDonald Newhook K.C.\, Q.Arb\nArbitrator\, Mediator\, Workplace Investigator\nDispute Winners\nVice-Chair\nNewfoundland and Labrador Labour Relations Board \n\n\nThis virtual program is taking place in partnership with the Gardiner Centre at Memorial University.Fittingly\, it will have an Atlantic focus and will be taking place on Newfoundland time. \nSpeakers\n\n \nSteve Penney\nEmployer Counsel\nStewart McKelvey \n\n\n \nKyle Rees\nUnion Counsel\nO’Dea Earle \n\n\nProgram DetailsEmployer and union representatives should cultivate the skills and knowledge necessary to resolve grievances early\, before expensive and unpredictable arbitration is necessary. But\, not every grievance can be settled without arbitration. When arbitration is necessary\, both employer and union representatives need to be able to effectively mount a successful grievance arbitration case or to give maximum assistance to counsel. \nOver the course of this workshop\, experienced employer and union advocates\, joined by an arbitrator on day two\, will lead participants in discussion of strategies for settling grievances before arbitration and explain how to win cases at arbitration when necessary. \nWorking through a realistic grievance with the guidance of experts\, participants will learn to: \n\nPrepare effectively for formal grievance meetings;\nDetermine which grievances should go to arbitration;\nIdentify key issues\, strengths\, and weaknesses of a grievance;\nAddress preliminary issues\, such as timeliness;\nObtain and provide appropriate disclosure;\nPrepare\, examine\, and cross-examine witnesses;\nMake persuasive opening and closing statements.\n\nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Nova Scotia for 11 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n \n\nMembers of CPHR Newfoundland & Labrador may consider counting this program for 11 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 11 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/effective-grievance-handling-and-arbitration-advocacy/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Professional Learning Program
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/EGGHAA.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20241210T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20241210T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240709T195256Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241126T205018Z
UID:14139-1733833800-1733839200@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Wrongful Dismissal Update: Recent court decisions you need to know about
DESCRIPTION:Moderator\n\n \nSheilagh Murphy\nArbitrator\, Mediator\, and Independent Workplace Investigator\nMacNab Fagan & Murphy \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nKimberly Boara Alexander\nEmployee Counsel\nKBA Partners LLP \n\n\n \nDianne Rideout\nEmployer Counsel\nCassels Brock & Blackwell LLP \n\n\nIn this webinar\, panelists will examine noteworthy wrongful dismissal decisions from the past year\, providing a comprehensive update on key cases and cross-country trends. The webinar will address topics such as: \n\nWhat types of conduct have been found to amount to “just cause” in recent cases? In what circumstances have employers successfully relied on “after-acquired cause”?\nWhat words or phrasing have courts found may invalidate a termination clause in an employment contract? How do courts differ between provinces in terms of their approach to interpreting such clauses and their willingness to uphold or declare them void?\nAre terms added to an employment offer after it is signed enforceable? Is the existence or the adequacy of a quid pro quo (consideration) determinative of whether an employment contract is binding?\nWill an invalid termination clause in an employment contract render the fixed-term provisions of the contract void?\nCan an employer claim that an employment contract has been frustrated due to economic hardship alone?\nCan an employer be found to have repudiated a contract as a result of its conduct when terminating an individual’s employment?\nWhat factors have courts considered in recent cases when determining whether an employee has satisfied the duty to mitigate? Are employees working under a fixed-term contract subject to the duty to mitigate?\nWhat types of conduct have prompted courts to award aggravated/moral or punitive damages in recent cases?\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent unjust dismissal cases? Can employees who have been unjustly dismissed be awarded both statutory severance pay and damages for lost wages?\n\nTopics will be finalized in the weeks prior to the webinar\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most important developments. \nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/wrongful-dismissal-update-recent-court-decisions-you-need-to-know-about/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/wrongful-dismissal-update.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241211
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241214
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240318T191640Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241212T191518Z
UID:12822-1733875200-1734134399@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Toronto Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference & Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector Conference
DESCRIPTION:Bargaining In The Broader Public Sector Conference\n\n\n\n\nConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nAdrienne Lei\nUnion Counsel\nDewart Gleason \n\n\n \nCheryl Wiles Pooran\nEmployer Counsel\nPooranLaw \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nLiam McCarthy\nDirector of the Negotiations and Programs Branch\nPublic Service Alliance of Canada \n\n\n \nDymphna Walko-Channan\nHuman Resource Manager\, Employee & Labour Relations\nCity of Toronto \n\n\n \nCynthia Watt\nVice President\nAMAPCEO \n\n\n \nRyan Wood\nNegotiator and Economist\nBass Associates \n\n\nLabour Arbitration And Policy ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nTim Gleason\nUnion Counsel\nDewart Gleason LLP \n\n\n \nDale Hewat\nArbitrator/Mediator \n\n\n \nErin Kuzz\nEmployer Counsel\nSherrard Kuzz LLP \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nAmandi Esonwanne\nSolicitor\nCity of Toronto \n\n\n \nAdrienne Liang\nLegal Counsel\nOntario Public Service Employees’ Union (OPSEU) \n\n\n \nPaul Meier\nSenior Counsel\nOntario’s Treasury Board Secretariat \n\n\n \nKate Shao\nUnion Counsel\nPaliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP \n\n\nWednesday\, December 11\, 2024Workshops*Workshops sold separately from stand-alone conference. \n\n\n\n\n\nTime\nSchedule\n\n\n\n\nBreakfast\n8:00 am – 9:00 am ET\n\n\nWorkshop\n9:00 am – 10:25 am ET\n\n\nMorning Break\n10:25 am – 10:40 am ET\n\n\nWorkshop\n10:40 am – 12:00 pm ET\n\n\nLunch\n12:00 pm – 1:00 pm ET\n\n\nWorkshop\n1:00 pm – 2:20 pm ET\n\n\nAfternoon Break\n2:20 pm – 2:35 pm ET\n\n\nWorkshop\n2:35 pm – 4:00 pm ET\n\n\nWorkshop Ends\n4:00 pm ET\n\n\n\n\nBargaining In The Broader Public Sector Conference WorkshopAdvanced Skills in Bargaining: Overcoming roadblocks\, costing benefits\, crafting language\n\n\n \nDonna Walrond\nEmployment lawyer\nBass Associates \n\n\n \nRishi Bandhu\nArbitrator\nRishi Bandhu Dispute Resolutions\nVice-Chair\nOntario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) \n\n\n \nDavid Jacobs\nUnion Counsel\nWatson Jacobs Bosnick LLP \n\n\nIn this interactive\, full-day workshop\, experts will help participants hone their bargaining skills\, with a focus on overcoming negotiation challenges\, determining the cost of benefits\, and crafting collective agreement language. By examining both employer and union-side perspectives and delving into case scenarios\, attendees will gain expertise necessary to craft clear\, compelling\, and innovative collective agreement language. \nLabour Arbitration And Policy Conference WorkshopReading it Right: Essential and emerging principles of collective agreement interpretation\n\n\n \nEvan Daikov\nEmployer Counsel\nRae Christen Jeffries LLP \n\n\n \nYasmeena Mohamed\nArbitrator/Mediator\nYM Arbitration & Mediation Services \n\n\n \nDijana Simonovic\nSenior Legal Counsel\nUnifor \n\n\nAn understanding of the principles of contract interpretation is indispensable for anyone involved in the negotiation or administration of a collective agreement. In this workshop\, experienced practitioners will equip participants with the knowledge needed to deal effectively with the wide array of interpretation issues that may arise in a unionized setting. The workshop will address topics including: \n\nWhat are the most commonly applied rules of collective agreement interpretation?\nWhat is the difference between the “plain meaning” approach and a “purposive” approach?\nWhat are “implied terms” of a collective agreement? How do they affect the interpretation of the express language of the contract?\nHow do arbitrators reconcile negotiated contract language and the contrary provisions of employment-related statutes\, e.g. human rights and employment standards legislation?\nWhen can evidence of collective bargaining history\, past practice\, or statements made during negotiations be used as an aid to interpretation?\nWhat is “contextual evidence\,” as set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Sattva case? In what circumstances can evidence of surrounding circumstances be admitted and relied upon to shed light on the meaning of a disputed clause?\nHow have arbitrators applied essential and emerging principles of interpretation in recent decisions and what lessons can be learned from these cases?\nHow has the doctrine of estoppel been applied in recent arbitration cases?\n\nThursday\, December 12\, 2024Bargaining In The Broader Public Sector ConferenceBreakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am ET \nIntroductory remarks: 9:00 am – 9:05 am ET \nPanel 1 - Checking the Financial Forecast: Bargaining in Ontario’s 2025 economy - 9:05 am – 10:20 am ET\n\n\n \nDoug Porter\nChief Economist and Managing Director\, Economics\nBMO \n\n\n \nElpis Law\nNegotiator\, Labour Relations Officer\, Equity Champion\, and Trainer\nPublic Service Alliance of Canada \n\n\n \nMichele White\nAssociate\nBass & Associates \n\n\n \nArmine Yalnizyan\nEconomist and Atkinson Fellow on the Future of Workers\nAtkinson Foundation \n\n\nIn this session\, expert panelists will explore 2025 economic and fiscal forecasts and their implications for bargaining\, focusing on settlements and awards. Specifically\, the panel will discuss: \n\nWhat short- and long-term economic trends are experts predicting Canadians will experience in 2025 in Ontario? Canada? The United States?\nAre inflation and cost-of-living projected to increase in 2025?\nWhat impact will raising Ontario’s minimum wage to $17.20 have on bargaining?\nWhat key non-monetary demands are emerging at the bargaining table in the current climate?\nWhat measures are governments likely to prioritize in 2025 provincial and federal budgets to promote economic growth and prosperity?\n\nBreak: 10:20 am – 10:35 am ET \nPanel 2 - Rapid Refresher: Experts discuss key decisions and legislation affecting bargaining - 10:35 am – 11:50 am ET\n\n\n \nJorge Hurtado\nUnion Counsel\nMorrison Watts \n\n\n \nEdward W. Snetsinger\nEmployer Counsel\nSherrard Kuzz \n\n\n \nDeanna Webb\nArbitrator\, Mediator and Workplace Investigator\nDW Workplace Resolutions \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will examine recent decisions\, legislative changes\, and other developments impacting bargaining in the public sector. Final topics will be selected in the weeks prior to the conference to ensure coverage of the latest and most important developments. However\, items currently under consideration include: \n\nRecent court\, labour arbitration\, and labour board decisions addressing:\n\nFreedom of association and government involvement in collective bargaining\nUnfair labour practices and violations of statutory freeze provisions\nKey issues at interest arbitration\, including inflation and staffing and recruitment issues\n\n\nRecent legislative initiatives including:\n\nFederal legislation to ban the use of strike replacement workers\nProvincial legislation amending the Employment Standards Act\, Occupational Health and Safety Act\, and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act\n\n\nRecent noteworthy collective agreements and strike actions\nCurrent labour relations trends\, including artificial intelligence\, remote work\, and the right to disconnect\n\nLunch: 11:50 am – 1:00 pm ET \nPanel 3 - Tech Talks: Addressing technological change\, surveillance\, monitoring\, and AI at the bargaining table - 1:00 pm – 2:20 pm ET\n\n\n \nNicole Gauthier\nExecutive Officer and Chief Negotiator\nOSSTF Toronto \n\n\n \nDr. Peter Lewis\nCanada Research Chair in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence \nAssociate Professor\nComputer Science\nOntario Tech University \n\n\n \nAlan McCallum\nEmployer Counsel\nPooranLaw \n\n\nIn this session\, expert panelists will provide guidance\, through collective bargaining\, on rapidly progressing technology and expanding monitoring and surveillance capabilities. Panelists will address questions including: \n\nAre concerns about the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on work overblown? Is this technological advance different from previous technological revolutions that raised concerns about mass unemployment and dehumanization of work?\nWhat aspects of work in the broader public sector are most likely to be affected by AI?\nDoes existing federal or provincial legislation set any limits on the use of AI in the workplace? What legislative initiatives are currently undergoing debate and how may they impact workplace parties if passed?\nWhat key impacts resulting from the use of AI in workplaces should be addressed through collective bargaining? Are concerns about AI adequately addressed by standard “technological change” provisions?\nHow should employers and unions address the potential use of algorithmic management\, e.g. delegating to algorithms certain managerial tasks such as filtering through applications for employment\, assessing employee performance\, or even making decisions regarding termination of employment under collective agreements?\nHow have arbitrators treated the use of emerging monitoring and surveillance technologies intended to measure employee productivity or performance\, such as biometric scanning\, wearables\, GPS tracking\, and keystroke monitoring software? What lessons can be learned from these decisions when negotiating collective agreement language?\nHow can parties address concerns about work intensification related to AI\, monitoring\, and surveillance through collective bargaining? Would standard “workload provisions” help? What about psychological health and safety provisions?\nAre employees entitled to information about how their employer is using AI and monitoring and surveillance technologies? Can this be addressed through collective bargaining?\n\nBreak: 2:20 pm – 2:35 pm ET \nPanel 4 - Breaking Barriers\, Achieving Balance: Addressing retention and EDI at the bargaining table - 2:35 pm – 3:55 pm ET\n\n\n \nMarilynn Dee\nManager Negotiations\nOntario Nurses’ Association (ONA) \n\n\n \nSundeep Gokhale\nEmployer Counsel\nSherrard Kuzz \n\n\n \nJesse Gutman\nLegal Counsel\nOntario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation (OSSTF) \n\n\n \nAnne Musacchio\nManager of Human Resources\nCity of Vaughan \n\n\nEmployees thrive in inclusive\, psychologically safe workplaces. Employers and unions can use the bargaining process to address equity\, diversity\, and inclusion (EDI) under a collective agreement to nurture a forward-thinking workplace that promotes employee wellness\, belonging\, and retention. In this panel\, experts will examine: \n\nHow can unions and employers best negotiate provisions under a collective agreement to create an inclusive workplace? What are specific examples of collective agreement provisions that prioritize EDI?\nWhat areas of EDI should employers and unions address in the bargaining process to help promote employee retention?\nWhat collective agreement language was found to be discriminatory? Not discriminatory?\nWhat measures are effective as a remedy for discrimination harassment\, or other forms of misconduct?\n\nClosing remarks: 3:55 pm – 4:00 pm ET \nFriday\, December 13\, 2024Labour Arbitration And Policy ConferenceIntroductory remarks by co-chairs: 9:00 am – 9:05 am ET \nPanel 1 - New and Noteworthy: Experts examine recent arbitration cases and policy developments - 9:05 am – 10:20 am ET\n\n\n \nAllyson Lee\nEmployer Counsel\nSherrard Kuzz LLP \n\n\n \nLaura Johnson\nUnion counsel\nRyder Wright Holmes Bryden Nam LLP \n\n\n \nDaniel Randazzo\nArbitrator and Mediator\nRandazzo Arbitration Services \n\n\nIn this session\, expert panelists will examine recent arbitration decisions on key workplace issues\, exploring the practical takeaways for employers and unions. The panel will address topics such as: \n\nPrivacy;\nComputer access\, monitoring and surveillance\nSubstance use testing;\nDiscipline and discharge;\nWorkplace investigations;\nDiscrimination\, harassment\, and accommodation;\nDefamation and anti-strategic lawsuits against public participation (“anti-SLAPP”) legislation;\nIssues of jurisdiction as between labour arbitrators and statutory tribunals; and\nRemote work.\n\nThe panel will also examine recent legislative and other initiatives\, such as: \n\nFederal legislation banning the use of strike replacement workers;\nFederal legislation requiring companies to report on the risk of and measures taken regarding forced labour and child labour in international supply chains;\nThe report of the Employment Equity Act Review Task Force and related changes to the Act; and\nThe Ontario government’s Working for Workers legislative series.\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments.Break: 10:20 am – 10:35 am ET \nPanel 2 - Drawing the Line: Reconciling employee free speech and legitimate employer concerns - 10:35 am – 11:40 am ET\n\n\n \nHeather Ann McConnell\nArbitrator/Mediator \n\n\n \nMegan Reid\nUnion Counsel\nDewart Gleason LLP \n\n\n \nAlex Treiber\nEmployer Counsel\nTreiber Workplace Law \n\n\nHow can employers balance freedom of expression under the Charter with the need to maintain a productive and respectful workplace? In this session\, panelists will address: \n\nDo employees have the right to express their views on potentially controversial and/or political matters at work?\nWhat criteria should employers and unions consider when determining whether an employee’s speech or actions pose a legitimate concern to the organization’s reputation or operations? What actions should employers or unions take when employees’ expressions may border on being disrespectful or offensive\, but are not overtly harmful?\nCan employers monitor employee expressions outside the workplace or on social media? Can employers discipline employees for such expressions?\nWhat is the extent of a union’s duty to represent members who face work-related consequences for potentially polarizing beliefs or actions? When will a union’s decision not to represent a member constitute a breach of the duty of fair representation?\nHow can employers and unions effectively communicate expectations regarding employee expression\, appropriate workplace conduct\, and appropriate off-work conduct?\n\nBreak: 11:40 am – 11:50 am ET \nFireside Chat with Jennifer Pernfuss: The Need to Reimagine How We Are Resolving Workplace Complaints – Harassment and More - 11:50 am – 12:30 pm ET\n\n\n \nJennifer Pernfuss\nCertified Restoration Practitioner\, Consultant & Coach\nRESPECT: Conciliation & Education \n\n\nNetworking Lunch: 12:30 pm – 1:20 pm ET \nPanel 3 - Invisible Illnesses: Accommodating poorly understood and episodic disabilities - 1:20 pm – 2:35 pm ET\n\n\n \nOdelia Bay\nPhD Candidate\nOsgoode Law\nYork University \n\n\n \nErin Porter\nEmployer Counsel\nFasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP \n\n\n \nWade Poziomka\nUnion Counsel\nRoss & McBride LLP \n\n\nDisabilities are diverse. Many employees may experience disabilities that are hidden\, fluid\, or poorly understood by medical professionals. Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodation to employees with disabilities — of all kinds — to enable their full participation in the workplace. In this panel\, experts will discuss the duties of employers and unions in accommodating employees with disabilities that may be hidden\, episodic\, or not widely understood. Panelists will explore: \n\nWhat are common medical conditions that are difficult to diagnose or understand? Why does “Long COVID-19” fall within this list?\nWhat are common challenges and best practices in accommodating employees who may experience disabilities that are hidden\, episodic\, or not fully understood by medical professionals? How should employers and unions respond when there is a lack of available medical practitioners with the requisite knowledge to provide information about a disability?\nWhat types of accommodations have generally been helpful for employees experiencing hidden\, episodic\, or poorly understood disabilities (e.g.\, flex time or working from home)?\nWhat are best practices for communicating during the accommodation process? For example\, how should employees and employers maintain communication about accommodation needs\, which may change frequently\, while respecting employee privacy? What role do unions play in such communications?\nWhen have adjudicators found that employers or unions have successfully accommodated or failed to accommodate employees with hidden or episodic disabilities?\nHow do disability-related stereotypes and stigmas play a role in complicating the accommodations process? What can employers and unions do to dismantle these stigmas and stereotypes and create an inclusive\, barrier-free workplace?\nWhat steps must unions take to assist in accommodation and satisfy their duty of fair representation of members with hidden or episodic disabilities?\n\nBreak: 2:35 pm – 2:50 pm ET \nPanel 4 - Is it Harassment? Or Isn’t It? An interactive panel seeks answers from actual case studies - 2:50 pm – 4:00 pm ET\n\n\n \nTyler Boggs\nUnion Counsel\nCavalluzzo LLP \n\n\n \nBonny Mak\nEmployer Counsel\nFasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP \n\n\n \nNana Yanful\nLawyer/Workplace Investigator \n\n\nIn many instances conduct or comments will clearly meet the definition of harassment. However\, in other cases debate may arise as to whether the alleged harasser knew or ought reasonably to have known that their behaviour was unwelcome\, offensive\, or harmful. In this session\, panelists will examine the degree to which reasonable minds may disagree about whether comments or conduct constitute harassment\, probe the reasons behind such disagreements\, and address issues such as: \n\nShould a complainant’s subjective feelings of humiliation or offence be determinative of whether certain conduct constitutes harassment? If not\, why not?\nWhat role do a complainant’s personal characteristics – gender and race\, for example – play in determining whether certain conduct should reasonably be seen to be offensive?\nDoes workplace culture play any role in determining whether conduct or comments amount to harassment?\nIs the analysis of whether conduct constitutes harassment affected by the existence of a friendship or previous romantic relationship between the complainant and respondent? What about power imbalances or lack thereof?\nHow is the reasonableness of management’s response assessed by arbitrators?\n\nCPDBargaining in the Broader Public Sector Conference CPD\n\n\n \n\nThis program (CPD Code) has been approved for 5.2 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 5.2 substantive hours; 0 professionalism hours.\n\n\n\nLabour Arbitration and Policy Conference CPD\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved for 5.4 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 5.4 substantive hours; 0 professionalism hours.\n\n\n\n\nWorkshop CPD\n\n\n \n\nThis program (CPD Code) has been approved for 5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 5 substantive hours; 0 professionalism hours.\n\n\n\nNearby HotelsHilton145 Richmond Street WestToronto\, ON\nM5H 2L2 \nRead MoreOne King West Hotel1 King Street WestToronto\, ON\nM5H 1A1 \nRead MoreHyatt Regency Toronto370 King St W\nToronto\, ON\nM5V 1J9 \nRead More
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/toronto-labour-arbitration-and-policy-conference-bargaining-in-the-broader-public-sector-conference/
LOCATION:Vantage Venues\, 150 King Street West\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5H 1J9\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector Conference,Conference,Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/header/TO-LACPSB-header.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250128T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250128T133000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240813T190814Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250109T202042Z
UID:14546-1738067400-1738071000@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Lancaster Speaker Series: Dr. Charl Els - Introducing Best Practices for the Independent Medical Examination (IME) of Mental and Behavioural Disorders
DESCRIPTION:SpeakersDr. Charl Els\nPsychiatrist\, Addiction Specialist\, and Occupational Physician \nClinical Professor\nDepartment of Psychiatry and Department of Medicine\nUniversity of Alberta \nProgramOccupational mental health disability claims continue to increase. As the physical impact of COVID-19 has diminished\, the mental and behavioural impact continues. Given the pre-existing service gap in mental health service delivery in Canada\, the pandemic has exacerbated what was already clearly an issue. \nAlong with other pre-existing factors\, this resulted in an increased demand for mental and behavioural disorder independent medical examinations (M&BD IMEs\, or psychiatric/psychological IMEs). There exists a need for broad adoption of IME best practice guidelines and standards for M&BD IME service providers. Anecdotally\, despite the high cost of requesting an IME\, and the relatively invasive nature of the assessment\, IME report quality and validity varies widely\, with at times questionable ability of such reports to stand up to judicial scrutiny. \nThis presentation introduces a best practice IME standard aligned with Canadian jurisprudence. It reflects appropriate use of the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) nomenclature\, while incorporating updates from recent Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Most importantly\, it provides an empirical mechanism to remedy the most salient challenge encountered in the validity of IMEs today\, i.e. the absence of sufficient objectivity in an otherwise subjective psychiatric assessment process. Further work is underway for inclusion of a national standard in Canadian Occupational Medicine and Civil Forensic practice and program settings. \nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 1 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider counting this program for 1 Continuing Professional Development hour.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider this program for 1 Substantive hour; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 1 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n\nAdditional InformationRegistration Fee – Single Attendee\nLive webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle: $195\nLive webinar: $125\nVideo and MP3: $125 \n(Registrations must be paid in advance of the webinar)\nPlease contact us by email\, or by phone at (416) 977-6618\, for discount pricing for additional participants and group orders. \nRegistration Information\nThe video recording and MP3 file are available for download and viewing one business day after the live event. After purchasing\, you will receive an e-mail with instructions on how to access and download the video recording and MP3 files. For purchases for upcoming events\, once the video recording and MP3 file are available\, registrants will receive an update e-mail informing them that the links are now ready.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/lancaster-speaker-series-dr-charl-els/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Lancaster Speaker Series,Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Lancaster-Speaker-Series-Dr-Charl-Els.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20250130T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20250130T160000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240829T152714Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250120T195018Z
UID:14710-1738227600-1738252800@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Difficult Bargaining: Identifying and Overcoming Obstacles to Agreement (Pacific Time Zone)
DESCRIPTION:Program Leader\n\n \nTrevor Sones\n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nJessica Fairbairn\n\n\n \nMaryna McTague\n\n\nProgram DetailsFinding the common ground that makes negotiation of a collective agreement possible can be a difficult process at the best of times. Is there a way to make the process easier\, or to prevent parties from becoming so entrenched in their own positions and views such that agreement is impossible? \nIn this interactive full-day workshop\, an experienced mediator along with two seasoned negotiators from both sides of the table will provide guidance on effectively using interest-based and other approaches to bargaining. Participants will learn to: \n\nUse more productive strategies when engaged in positional bargaining;\nIdentify situations in which interest-based bargaining can be used effectively;\nCommunicate effectively to identify needs and interests underlying demands;\nGenerate creative options to solve tough problems; and\nBuild and preserve productive union-management relationships through bargaining.\n\nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/difficult-bargaining-identifying-and-overcoming-obstacles-to-agreement/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Skills Training
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/difficult-bargaining-st-pt.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250130T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250130T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240829T171738Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250109T173708Z
UID:14733-1738240200-1738245600@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Annual Human Rights Update: The latest cases and legislative developments
DESCRIPTION:Moderator\n\n \nMichelle Farrell\nMediator\, human rights lawyer\, and workplace investigator \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nAmarkai Laryea\nUnion Counsel\nRavenLaw LLP \n\n\n \nStephanie Yang Morris\nEmployer Counsel\nMLT Aikins \n\n\nIn this webinar\, experts will examine recent noteworthy developments in workplace human rights law. Panelists will address questions including: \n\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent cases addressing the adequacy of workplace investigations into allegations of harassment and discrimination? What information relating to the outcome of the investigation must employers convey to affected employees?\nHow have arbitrators and human rights tribunals resolved evidentiary challenges relating to establishing subtle or systemic forms of discrimination? Does the caselaw reflect a growing recognition of certain pervasive stereotypes and biases such that expert evidence on these points is no longer required?\nWhat do recent cases suggest about when an employee’s beliefs\, such as ethical veganism or an opposition to vaccination\, constitute protected beliefs under human rights legislation? When will disciplining or dismissing employees due to their expression of unpopular\, controversial\, or allegedly discriminatory views violate their religion- and creed-based rights?\nWhen may refusing to allow an employee to work from home constitute discrimination on the basis of family status?\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent caselaw regarding best practices for promoting and respecting gender diversity and neurodiversity at work?\nHow have decision-makers in recent cases balanced an employee’s human rights against other workplace considerations\, such as health and safety requirements?\nIn what jurisdictions have human rights tribunals been found to have concurrent jurisdiction with labour arbitrators over human rights claims of unionized employees?\nIs a cap on damages under human rights legislation legally valid?\nWhat noteworthy legislative and policy initiatives have recently been introduced impacting human rights at work? For example:\n\nWhat amendments to the federal Employment Equity Act have been announced following the Report of the Employment Equity Act Review Task Force?\nWhat is required under the new return to work obligations introduced in B.C.’s and Nova Scotia’s workers compensation legislation? How do these duties intersect with parties’ obligations under human rights legislation?\nWhat are the implications of the Ontario Human Rights Commissions’ new policy statement on caste-based discrimination?\n\n\n\nFinal selection of cases and topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the webinar\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments. \nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/annual-human-rights-update-the-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments-2025/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Annual-Human-Rights-Update-The-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250204T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250325T160000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20241205T211412Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250318T150106Z
UID:15433-1738672200-1742918400@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Labour Relations Certificate - Winter 2025 (Virtual Program)
DESCRIPTION:In association with:Upon completion of this program\, participants will receive a certificate of completion and a digital credential. \nProgram\nThe Labour Relations Certificate Program\, presented by Toronto Metropolitan University and Lancaster House\, is designed to provide individuals engaged in labour relations with the core skills and knowledge required to create and maintain productive union-management relationships that foster fair and efficient workplaces. \nTaught by Canada’s leading labour relations scholars and practitioners\, this program combines theory\, leading research\, and professional experience to provide an education that has immediate application in participants’ workplaces. \nProgram features \n\nAccess to leading Canadian experts in a small-group setting\nActive learning through group discussion\, case studies\, and simulations\nBalanced coverage of labour and management points of view\nManagement\, union\, and neutral attendees learn together\nExposure to diverse opinions and extensive knowledge of fellow participants\nVariety of speakers (academics\, lawyers\, practitioners\, subject-matter experts)\n\nWho should attend? \n\nHuman resources professionals\nUnion officers and representatives\nLawyers\nManagers\nMediators\nWorkplace investigators\n\nProgram Leader\nDaphne Taras\nProfessor and Director\nCentre for Labour-Management Relations\nToronto Metropolitan University \nProgram Faculty\n\n \nAlex Brat\nSenior Executive Director\, Labour Relations\nUniversity of Toronto \n\n\n \nSharan Basran\nChief Legal Officer\, Legal Counsel\nOntario Nurses’ Association (ONA) \n\n\n \nBruce Curran\nAssociate Professor\nFaculty of Law\nUniversity of Manitoba \n\n\n \nChris Davidson\nAssociate Lawyer\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\n \nShana French\nEmployer Counsel\nLittler LLP \n\n\n \nKat Leonard\nNational Representative\nUnifor \n\n\n \nAvner Levin\nProfessor\nLincoln Alexander School of Law\nTed Rogers School of Management\nToronto Metropolitan University (TMU) \n\n\n \nNiki Lundquist\nSenior Director of Equity and Education\nUnifor \n\n\n \nIan Mackenzie\nWriter\, Trainer\, Consultant\, and Facilitator \n\n\n \nFrank Miller\nDirector\nExecutive and Corporate Education\nToronto Metropolitan University (TMU) \n\n\n \nDionne Pohler\nAssociate Professor\nUniversity of Saskatchewan \n\n\n \nShannon Sproule\nEmployer Counsel\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\n \nJim Stanford\nEconomist and Director\nCentre for Future Work\nAustralia Institute \n\n\n \nBob Thompson\nProfessor\, Human Resources\nSeneca Polytechnic \n\n\n2025 Winter Schedule†The Winter 2025 session of the Labour Relations Certificate Program will comprise of 8 sessions over 8 weeks\, and will take place on Tuesdays from 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. ET beginning February 4\, 2025. \nSample Agenda\nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Nova Scotia for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 3.5 substantive hours; 0 professionalism hours\, per session.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/labour-relations-certificate-winter-2025/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Professional Learning Program
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/header/TMU-header.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250213T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250213T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020106
CREATED:20240829T172122Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250212T175915Z
UID:14735-1739449800-1739455200@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Dealing with Discrimination in the Workplace
DESCRIPTION:Moderator\n\n \nGurleen S. Sahota\nVice-Chair\nBritish Columbia Labour Relations Board \n\n\nOption: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \nSpeakers\n\n \nAubrey Gonsalves\nDiversity Vice-President\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) National \n\n\n \nSania Chaudhry\nLabour\, Employment and Human Rights Lawyer\, Workplace Investigator\nForte Workplace Law \n\n\n \nTana Turner\nPrincipal\nTurner Consulting Group Inc. \n\n\nDiscrimination can have a profound impact on the physical and mental health of employees\, as well as their motivation and engagement in the workplace. In this webinar\, a panel of experts will provide practical guidance on how employers and unions can foster a work environment that ensures the full and fair participation of employees. \n\nWhat is systemic racism and how does it differ from individual racism? How have systemic barriers to recruitment\, retention\, and promotion been remedied in recent caselaw?\nIs a culture of lax enforcement of respectful conduct a defense to an allegation of harassment? What impact does an organization’s culture have on the impact on people’s ability to raise complaints of harassment and discrimination?\nCan employees’ benefits be cut back upon retirement?\nTo what extent must the childcare or elder care needs of employees be taken into account by employers?\nAre employers entitled to ask employees details about their medical conditions rather than about restrictions on their ability to perform their duties? What length must employers go to in accommodating employees’ disabilities?\nWhat are the required features of an effective workplace policy on discrimination?\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/dealing-with-discrimination-in-the-workplace/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Anti-Racism-at-Work-Strategies-for-proactively-addressing-discrimination-and-promoting-equity.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250221T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250221T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20240829T170838Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250220T170451Z
UID:14729-1740141000-1740146400@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Annual Labour Law Update: The latest cases and legislative developments
DESCRIPTION:Option: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \nModerator\n\n \nKarine Pelletier\nChairperson\nManitoba Labour Board \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nGraham Christie\nEmployer counsel\nMLT Aikins \n\n\n \nAlison McEwen\nUnion Counsel\nRavenLaw LLP \n\n\nIn this webinar\, experts will explore recent noteworthy developments in labour law. Panelists will address questions including: \n\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent cases addressing freedom of association and government involvement in collective bargaining? When will legislation or other government actions which impact collective bargaining be found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid?\nAre employers entitled to discipline or demote employees for expressing unpopular or controversial views at work? When can employers discipline or discharge employees for off-duty conduct\, such as exchanging inappropriate text messages about a colleague in a private group chat?\nWhen will an employer’s search of an employee’s work or personal device be considered an unreasonable violation of privacy? When will the Charter apply?\nWhen will an employer’s remote work policy requiring employees to attend in-office certain days of the week be found to be unreasonable and/or in breach of the parties’ collective agreement?\nUnder what circumstances have arbitrators in recent cases found requests for substance use testing to be unreasonable or improper?\nWhat trends are discernible in recent discipline and discharge cases? When may an employer be held liable for damages for the manner in which an employee is dismissed?\nWhat noteworthy federal and provincial legislative initiatives have recently been introduced? For example:\n\nWhich jurisdictions have introduced legislation restricting the use of strike replacement workers and what are the implications of such legislation?\nWhat challenges have arisen in implementing new federal legislation requiring disclosure of measures to prevent forced labour and child labour in supply chains?\nWhat is required under the new return to work obligations introduced in B.C.’s and Nova Scotia’s workers compensation legislation?\nWhat changes have been implemented through the latest installments of the Ontario government’s Working for Workers series of legislation?\nWhich jurisdictions have introduced legislation bringing “gig workers” within the scope of employment standards and workers’ compensation legislation?\n\n\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the webinar\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments. \nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/annual-labour-law-update-the-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments-2025/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Annual-Labour-Law-Update-The-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250227T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250227T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20240829T172509Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250220T162203Z
UID:14737-1740659400-1740664800@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Faith at the Fore: Key principles and recent decisions relating to religious accommodation at work
DESCRIPTION:Option: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \nModerator\n\n \nPatricia Harewood\nMember\nFederal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board (FPSLREB) \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nConnie Cheung\nEmployer Counsel\nSherrard Kuzz LLP \n\n\n \nSandy Donaldson\nLabour Relations Officer\nOntario Nurses’ Association (ONA) \n\n\n \nRoberta Vriesema\nMediator\nRJ Mediation Services \n\n\nIn this webinar\, experts will examine recent cases and provide guidance on key issues regarding the accommodation of religious beliefs in the workplace. Topics to be addressed include: \n\nHow have “religion” and “creed” been defined by courts and human rights bodies? What types of non-religious belief systems have been considered to fall under the protected ground of “creed”?\nWhat types of information or “proof” may employers or unions request to substantiate an employee’s religious belief or practice?\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent COVID-19 vaccination cases in which employees alleged discrimination on the basis of religion or creed? How have decisions-makers distinguished between protected beliefs and political views or personal preferences? In what circumstances have employees’ beliefs about vaccination been found to be sufficiently connected to their religion or creed?\nHow should employers and unions respond when an employee espouses religious or creed-based beliefs in the workplace which may infringe the human rights of other employees?\nIn what ways have human rights bodies recognized the potential intersection between discrimination on the basis of religion or creed and discrimination on the basis of other protected grounds\, such as ancestry\, colour\, race\, ethnic origin\, place of origin\, or family status?\nWhat are some examples of collective agreement language that have recently been negotiated to promote religious diversity at work? What policy changes and other workplace practices can employers and unions implement to this effect?\nWhat obligations do unions bear in ensuring employees’ religious beliefs are respected and upheld? What lessons may be learned from recent cases in which employees alleged that the failure to advance grievances relating to alleged religious- or creed-based discrimination constituted a breach of the duty of fair representation?\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/faith-at-the-fore-key-principles-and-recent-decisions-relating-to-religious-accommodation-at-work/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Faith-at-the-Fore-banner.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250306T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250306T163000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20240814T135558Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250306T202646Z
UID:14583-1741266000-1741278600@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:National Pensions Conference 2025
DESCRIPTION:National Pensions ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nPadraigin Murphy\nPensions Counsel\nKoskie Minsky LLP \n\n\n \nMichael Wolpert\nPensions Counsel\nFasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP \n\n\n$795.00Read more	\n			\n \nConference Advisory Committee\n  \n\n \nChristina Atanasova\nChristina Atanasova\, Associate Dean\, Research & International\nProfessor\, Simon Fraser University (SFU) \n\n\n \nLevel Chan\nPensions Counsel\nStewart McKelvey \n\n\n \nChris Roberts\nDirector\, Social and Economic Policy\nCanadian Labour Congress \n\n\nThursday\, March 6\, 2025Introduction: 1:00 pm – 1:05 pm ET \nKeynote speech by Dr. Paul Kershaw - Healthy retirement and its implications for private and public pension policy\, now and in the future - 1:05 pm – 1:35 pm ET\n\n\n \nPaul Kershaw\nProfessor\nUniversity of British Columbia\nLead Researcher & Executive Chair\nGeneration Squeeze \n\n\nThe “Outlook for Expenses” table in any recent federal budget makes clear that Old Age Security (OAS) funding is growing faster than most other federal spending combined. All the while\, spending on medical care for those age 65+ absorbs more and more provincial revenue. \nDecades ago\, sufficient revenue was not allocated to fully cover the long-term costs of OAS and medical care for the baby boomer generation. As a result\, these two expenditures now place significant pressure on government budgets\, limiting funding for national defense\, housing\, childcare\, education\, and other priorities valued by Canadians\, including balanced budgets. \nYounger Canadians already contribute 20 to 40 percent more in income taxes toward healthy retirements than the current retiring generation contributed to older generations when they were young. \nThese fiscal trends compound challenges for younger Canadians who struggle with higher rent and home ownership costs that have outpaced their earnings. The implications for their retirement planning are concerning\, because many have little left over to contribute to retirement savings. They count on managers of private pension plans to make excellent decisions — when they are lucky enough to be in jobs that have such pensions. \nAll of this was predictable\, because when the baby boomer generation started out\, there were seven working age Canadians for every retiree. Now\, as they retire\, there are only three. However\, past decision-making processes did not account for these demographic shifts adding burden to younger generations when creating pension and medical care policies. Today’s governments\, regardless of their ideological affiliation\, are holding the bag — and the load is very heavy indeed to pay for OAS and medical care for retirees. \nBreak: 1:35 pm – 1:45 pm ET \nPanel 1 - What's New in Pension Law in 2025: Major caselaw and legislative updates - 1:45 pm – 3:00 pm ET\n\n\n \nKiersten Amos\nEmployer Counsel\nMcInnes Cooper \n\n\n \nJames Fu\nEmployer counsel\nBorden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG) \n\n\n \nAnthony Guindon\nPensions Counsel\nKoskie Minsky LLP \n\n\n \nEmily Lawrence\nManaging Partner\nPaliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP \n\n\nThis panel will review recent legislative and regulatory pension developments. Topics to be addressed include: \n\nCanada Pension Plan benefit and contribution increases;\nAmendments to the federal Income Tax Act; and\nCAPSA Guidelines for Capital Accumulation Plans and Risk Management for Plan Administrators.\n\nThis panel will also explore significant court and tribunal decisions related to pension and benefits law. Topics to be addressed include: \n\nplan amendments;\ncollective agreement violations;\ndiscrimination and denials of benefits;\nthe relationship between class actions and regulatory jurisdiction;\nfiduciary duties; and\nnegligence and constitutional issues arising out of public sector pension plan reform.\n\nFinal selection of cases will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most important decisions.Break: 3:00 pm – 3:15 pm ET \nPanel 2 - Emerging Issues in Pension Governance: Addressing cybersecurity\, AI\, ESG\, economic challenges\, and more - 3:15 pm – 4:30 pm ET\n\n\n \nChristine Chen\nGeneral Counsel\nUniversity Pension Plan Ontario (UPP) \n\n\n \nMark Janson\nSenior Researcher\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) \n\n\n \nScott Sweatman\nEmployer lawyer\nDentons \n\n\nEven well-funded pension plans must adapt in the face of economic and demographic challenges. In this session\, experts will explore the risks and opportunities associated with the current and projected economic climate\, and address the following: \n\nHow would a sustained fall in inflation and/or interest rates affect pension plans and their members?\nHow are views on the meaning of retirement changing\, and what does this mean for pensions and other sources of retirement income?\nWhat strategies should pension plan administrators take to manage pension plans and pension plan investments in an economic downturn? What role do administrators’ statutory and fiduciary obligations play in this regard?\nHow will recently published provincial regulatory policies on IT risk management impact pension plans and their sponsors?\nWhat role\, if any\, will artificial intelligence play in the administration of pension plans and pension funds?\nWhat are the current legislative and regulatory requirements regarding ESG disclosure\, taking into account ESG considerations\, across Canadian jurisdictions? What changes are in prospect?\nTo what extent do ESG considerations factor into investment-related decision-making? Do common law fiduciary duties permit administrators to take ESG considerations into account for any purpose other than financial gain? Does the answer depend on plan terms or type of plan\n\nCPDConference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 3 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 3 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 3 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 3 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 3 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 3 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 3 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/national-pensions-conference-2025/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Conference,Pensions
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/National-Pensions-Conference-2025-banner.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250313T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250313T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20240829T172841Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250306T203553Z
UID:14739-1741869000-1741874400@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Supporting Complainants\, Addressing Root Causes: Trauma-informed approaches to workplace violence\, harassment\, and bullying
DESCRIPTION:Understand Trauma-Informed Approaches in the Workplace\nAcross all sectors\, organizations are recognizing how much they can gain from applying trauma-informed principles when addressing workplace violence\, harassment\, and bullying. In this webinar\, experts will explore the benefits to employers\, unions\, and employees of adopting trauma-informed principles. Specifically\, panelists will discuss: \n\nWhat does it mean to be trauma-informed? What does it mean to implement trauma-informed approaches in labour relations processes?\nWhat legal obligations do employers and unions have to protect and promote employee mental health in the workplace and to address workplace violence\, harassment\, and bullying? How may adopting trauma-informed approaches help ensure that employers and unions meet these obligations?\nWhat are some trauma-informed best practices that employers and unions can employ throughout internal complaint\, alternative dispute resolution\, performance management\, disciplinary\, or accommodation processes?\nWhy are trauma-informed approaches important when conducting investigations into allegations of workplace violence\, harassment\, or bullying? What does recent caselaw suggest regarding what constitutes an appropriate investigative process and how may trauma-informed approaches assist in ensuring a fair\, adequate\, and effective process?\nCan employers and unions be held liable for failing to employ trauma-informed approaches?\nWhat does evidence suggest regarding how trauma-informed approaches can help to improve employee retention\, reduce workplace violence\, harassment\, and bullying\, and create psychologically safe workplaces?\n\nAdditional InformationMaterials\nValuable\, up-to-date materials and case summaries will be available for downloading from our website. Each webinar is accompanied by a PDF of concise summaries of the cases discussed. \nRegistration Fee – Single Attendee\nLive webinar\, video\, and MP3 bundle – $995\nLive webinar – $395\nVideo and MP3 – $695\n(Registrations must be paid in advance of the webinar)\nPlease contact us by email\, or by phone at (416) 977-6618\, for discount pricing for additional participants and group orders. \nRegistration Information\nThe video recording\, MP3 file\, and materials are available for download and viewing one business day after the live webinar. After purchasing\, you will receive an e-mail with instructions on how to access and download the video recording\, MP3 file\, and materials. For purchases for upcoming webinars\, once the video recording and MP3 file and materials are available\, registrants will receive an update e-mail informing them that the links are now ready. \nOption: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nModerator\n\n \nSharon Naipaul\nMediator/Investigator\nStrategic Workplace Equity and Conflict Resolution Solutions \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nAshton Butler\nEmployer Counsel\nMLT Aikins \n\n\n \nNadja Rence\nLawyer\, Workplace Investigator\nSouthern Butler Price \n\n\n \nShyama Talukdar\nUnion Counsel\nPaliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/supporting-complainants-addressing-root-causes-trauma-informed-approaches-to-workplace-violence-harassment-and-bullying/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Supporting-Complainants-Addressing-Root-Causes-Trauma-informed-approaches-to-workplace-violence-harassment-and-bullying.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250318
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250328
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20241211T173709Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250327T160626Z
UID:15444-1742256000-1743119999@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Navigating Workplace Investigations: Best Practices
DESCRIPTION:4 half-day sessions over 2 weeks – Tuesdays and Thursdays\, 12:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ET each day \nProgram$2\,095.00Read more	\n			\n \nAll workplace parties have an interest in ensuring that workplace investigations are conducted properly. Employers may face legal liability for workplace investigations that are improperly conducted. Employees subjected to investigation may find their jobs on the line. Unions must ensure that their members’ rights are protected. This program will prepare employer and union representatives to effectively represent the interests of their constituencies throughout the investigation process\, from the filing of the complaint to post-investigation review of the report. \nOver the course of four virtual sessions combining lectures\, case studies\, and interactive exercises\, participants will learn to: \n\nApply applicable law and policy\nDetermine when an external investigator is required\nIdentify the necessary steps in an investigation\nEnsure procedural fairness\nBe mindful of implicit bias\nAppreciate the role rules of evidence play in making findings\nAddress issues of confidentiality and privilege\nReview investigation reports\nTake appropriate action post-investigation\n\nIn association with:Registrants who participate in all four sessions will receive a certificate confirming their successful completion the program. \nProgram Leaders\n\n \nChris Davidson\nLawyer\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\n \nAsha Rampersad\nPartner\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\n \nKrista Siedlak\nPartner\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 12.6 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 12.6 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 12.6 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 12.6 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 12.6 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 12.6 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/navigating-workplace-investigations-best-practices/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Professional Learning Program
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Navigating-Workplace-Investigations-March-2025-banner.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Halifax:20250404T110000
DTEND;TZID=America/Halifax:20250404T170000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20241205T183445Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250318T181226Z
UID:15431-1743764400-1743786000@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Grievance and Interest Arbitration in the University Sector
DESCRIPTION:ProgramIn this virtual workshop\, experts will address key issues and trends in interest arbitration and grievance arbitration in the university sector\, as reflected in the decisions of leading arbitrators across Canada. Attendees can expect to learn principles and practices related to the following: \n$1\,195.00Read more	\n			\n \n\nAcademic freedom and the limits on faculty’s “free speech” rights\nSalary disputes and remedial options\nPension and benefit issues\, before and after retirement\nPrivacy concerns and access to information\nThe role and results of grievance arbitration\nFaculty bargaining and its outcomes\nChallenging promotion and merit pay decisions\nFaculty rights to design courses\, assign marks\, determine content\nUniversity governance issues: the roles of the President\, Senate and Faculty Association\n\n\nAdvancing EDI\nEnsuring accommodation\, combatting discrimination\nChallenging discipline\nDefending against harassment\nNavigating investigations\, invoking protections\nAppointments: tenured\, tenure stream\, teaching\, sessional\, contractually limited\nWorkload\nJob security: closures\, cutbacks\, abolition of programs\n\nAccompanied by materials\, developed by Lancaster House Lawyers\, that offer extensive case law analysis\, legislative updates\, summaries\, and practical guidance—all thoroughly researched and designed for easy reference.\nSpeakers\n\n \nChris Albertyn\nArbitrator \n\n\n \nWassim Garzouzi\nRavenlaw LLP \n\n\n \nJennifer S. Russell\nRoper Greyell LLP \n\n\nCPDConference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 4.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 4.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 4.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 4.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 4.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 4.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 4.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/grievance-and-interest-arbitration-in-the-university-sector/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Labour Law & Labour Policy,Skills Training,Workshop
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IA-University-Sector-Apr-2025.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250416
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250418
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20240806T201553Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250417T191019Z
UID:14518-1744761600-1744934399@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Vancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference 2025
DESCRIPTION:Championing Workplace Equity\, Inclusion\, and ComplianceWhat is the Vancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference 2025?The Vancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference 2025 is the premier event for HR professionals\, legal practitioners\, union representatives\, and business leaders seeking cutting-edge insights into human rights law\, workplace accommodations\, and equity\, diversity\, and inclusion (EDI) best practices. Hosted by Lancaster House\, this two-day event offers expert-led discussions\, real-world case studies\, and interactive sessions to help organizations navigate emerging legal challenges in the workplace. \nVancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Bundle: Conference + Workshop$1\,995.00Read more	\n			\n  \nVancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Pre-Conference Workshop$1\,095.00Read more	\n			\n  \nVancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference$1\,395.00Read more	\n			\n  \nWhat We’re CoveringOur 2025 agenda is carefully curated to address the latest human rights issues and accommodation challenges facing employers\, unions\, and employees. Key topics include: \n\nLandmark Human Rights Cases & Legislative Updates – Stay ahead of the latest legal changes impacting human rights law. \n\nHuman Rights in Hybrid Workplaces – Managing accommodations in the era of remote and hybrid work. \n\nEquity\, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Strategies – Tackling systemic discrimination and fostering inclusive workplace cultures. \n\nMental Health and Disability Accommodations – Proactive approaches to supporting employee wellness. \n\nFree Speech vs. Employer Rights – Navigating the complexities of employee expression in the workplace. \n\nRestorative Justice in Workplace Misconduct – When to use discipline vs. alternative dispute resolution. \nThis conference features leading legal experts\, HR professionals\, and policymakers\, ensuring attendees receive actionable strategies and the most up-to-date legal interpretations. \nWho Should Attend?This event is designed for professionals across multiple industries\, including: \n\nHuman Resources Leaders – HR managers\, directors\, and disability management specialists navigating accommodations and compliance. \n\nEmployment & Labour Lawyers – Legal professionals seeking updates on human rights and workplace accommodation case law. \n\nUnion Representatives & Labour Relations Experts – Advocates ensuring fair treatment of employees in collective bargaining. \n\nCorporate Executives & Compliance Officers – Business leaders responsible for implementing workplace policies aligned with human rights law. \n\nGovernment & Public Sector Professionals – HR and legal representatives working in municipal\, provincial\, and federal agencies. \nKey Learning OutcomesBy attending this conference\, you will:\n✔ Understand the latest human rights law updates and their impact on workplace policies.\n✔ Gain best practices for accommodation requests related to disability\, religion\, and family status.\n✔ Develop strategies for fostering an inclusive workplace and preventing discrimination.\n✔ Learn from top legal and HR experts through engaging panel discussions and real-world case studies.\n✔ Network with industry peers and build valuable professional connections. \nConference Packages & Registration DetailsChoose from a range of flexible registration options: \n🎟 Two-Day Conference Pass – Access to all panels\, keynotes\, and networking events.\n📚 Conference + Materials Bundle – Includes all session recordings and presentation slides for post-event reference.\n🏆 Group Discounts Available – Save when registering multiple team members. \nWhy Choose Lancaster House? \nWith over 45 years of excellence in legal education\, Lancaster House is Canada’s leading provider of workplace law expertise. Our conferences are trusted by top HR professionals\, legal experts\, and industry leaders for their unparalleled depth\, practical insights\, and real-world applicability. \n🔹 Expert-Driven Content – Learn from Canada’s leading human rights and labour law specialists.\n🔹 Unmatched Networking Opportunities – Connect with decision-makers and industry peers.\n🔹 Practical\, Actionable Insights – Walk away with strategies you can implement immediately.\n🔹 Comprehensive Resource Materials – Access detailed case law summaries and best practice guides. \nReserve Your Spot Today! \nSecure your place at Canada’s most essential human rights and accommodation event. Don’t miss this opportunity to enhance your expertise and ensure workplace compliance in 2025 and beyond! \nThursday\, April 17\, 2025Breakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am PT \nOpening remarks: 9:00 am – 9:05 am PT \nPanel 1 - Keeping Current on Human Rights: The latest cases and legislative developments - 9:05 am – 10:20 am PT\n\n\n \nRichard Coleman\nArbitrator/Mediator \n\n\n \nJadine (Jay) Lannon\nUnion Counsel\nForte Law \n\n\n \nAndrea L. Zwack\nEmployer Counsel\nGall Legge Grant Zwack LLP \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will delve into the numerous recent and significant developments in workplace human rights\, examining key cases and legislative changes. Speakers will discuss the latest cases on topics such as: \n\nidentifying and addressing stereotypes and/or bias;\nrights and restrictions relating to employee expression of personal or political views and beliefs at work;\ntrends in discipline\, damages\, and arbitration;\nprivacy\, monitoring\, and surveillance;\nremote work;\nsubstance use and testing;\nthe intersection between health and safety concerns and human rights obligations; and\nkey principles and best practices in investigating discrimination and harassment claims.\n\nThe panel will also address B.C. and federal legislative initiatives\, including reporting requirements under the B.C. Pay Transparency Act and obligations under the federal Pay Equity Act. \nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments. \nBreak: 10:20 am – 10:35 am PT \nPanel 2 - AI Through a Human Rights Lens: The potential uses and challenges posed by the use of artificial intelligence at work - 10:35 am – 11:35 am PT\n\n\n \nPreston Parsons\nPartner\nOverholt LLP \n\n\n \nRachel Roy\nPartner\nRachel Roy Law \n\n\n \nWendy H. Wong\nProfessor and Principal’s Research Chair\nUniversity of British Columbia \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will provide expert guidance on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) at work\, exploring the potential benefits and pitfalls of AI from a human rights perspective. Panelists will address questions such as: \n\nWhat federal and provincial laws regulate the use of AI? What legislative initiatives are currently the subject of debate and how may they impact workplace parties if passed? What other legal obligations and principles govern or restrict the use of AI at work?\nWhat key human rights considerations and privacy concerns are raised by the use of AI in the workplace? Does AI have the potential to reduce systemic discrimination and improve working conditions for equity-seeking employees?\nWhat human rights concerns are raised by the prospect of algorithmic management\, defined as delegating to algorithms certain managerial tasks such as screening applications for employment\, assessing employee performance\, or even making decisions regarding the termination of employment?\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent cases in which arbitrators and adjudicators have addressed privacy concerns relating to the use of other evolving technologies in the workplace\, such as biometric monitoring\, audio and video surveillance\, and GPS tracking?\nHow can parties address through collective bargaining the human rights and privacy impact resulting from the use of AI in workplaces?\nWhat steps can employers and unions take to mitigate the risk of bias\, discrimination\, or other breaches of human rights when using AI?\n\nBreak: 11:35 am – 11:45 am PT \nKeynote Speech by Kai Scott - Bridging the Divide – The Future of Gender Inclusion in the Workplace - 11:45 am – 12:15 pm PT\n\n\n \nKai Scott\nPresident\nTransFocus Consulting \n\n\nAs gender inclusion efforts in the workplace reach a critical juncture\, how do we move beyond division and toward solutions that benefit everyone—women\, men\, transgender\, and non-binary people alike? Drawing from nearly a decade of insights at TransFocus Consulting\, this keynote will explore the evolving landscape of workplace gender inclusion\, addressing both the progress made and the tensions that persist. \nAt a time when gender issues are increasingly polarized\, this session will focus on practical ways to foster connection across diverse gender experiences while meeting legal obligations and organizational goals. We’ll examine key lessons from the past decade\, emerging challenges\, and strategies for bridging gaps—whether in policy design\, workplace culture\, or leadership approaches. \nJoin Kai for a thought-provoking reflection on where we’ve been\, where we’re headed\, and how organizations can take meaningful\, sustainable steps toward gender inclusion that work for everyone. \nLunch: 12:15 pm – 1:15 pm PT \nPanel 3 - Free Speech and Human Rights at Work: Are they in conflict? Can they be reconciled? - 1:15 pm – 2:30 pm PT\n\n\n \nHasan Alam\nStaff Lawyer\nB.C. General Employees’ Union (BCGEU) \n\n\n \nLeanne Monsma\nEmployer Counsel\nUniversity of British Columbia \n\n\n \nAmber Prince\nMember\nBC Human Rights Tribunal \n\n\nAs the political climate becomes increasingly polarized\, domestically and abroad\, employers must navigate how to cultivate a safe\, healthy\, and productive work environment while also respecting employees’ right to express their personal views. In this session\, panelists will explore how employers and unions should respond to the exercise of political speech in the workplace\, and in doing so will address the following questions: \n\nTo what extent\, if any\, can employers limit political expression in the workplace? How may this differ for public-sector employees?\nHow has the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal interpreted the meaning of “political belief”?\nWhen will the expression of political views rise to the threshold of discrimination and/or harassment?\nWhat kinds of policies and guidelines should an employer put in place to address politically-based conflict in the workplace? Where conflicts arise among employees\, with respect to charges of discrimination and harassment\, which member should the union represent?\nCan employers discipline employees for political expressions that are expressed outside of the workplace? For example\, can an employer discipline a member for offensive posts made on social media?\nWhen are unions required to represent members who experience discipline for political expression? What does the union’s duty of fair representation require in these circumstances?\n\nBreak: 2:30 pm – 2:45 pm PT \nPanel 4 - Is it Discrimination? Or Isn’t It? An interactive panel seeks answers from actual case studies - 2:45 pm – 4:00 pm PT\n\n\n \nShirin Kiamanesh\nUnion Counsel\nKoskie Glavin Gordon \n\n\n \nTamisha Parris\nDiversity\, Equity\, Accessibility\, & Inclusion Consultant\nParris Consulting \n\n\n \nSalim Visram\nEmployer Counsel\nDentons \n\n\nIn this interactive session\, panelists will address scenarios based on real cases involving allegations of discrimination\, examining legal principles for identifying and addressing subtle and systemic forms of discrimination as well as meeting obligations such as the duty to accommodate. Panelists will address questions such as: \n\nHow have arbitrators and human rights tribunals resolved evidentiary and credibility challenges when determining whether discrimination has occurred?\nWhat contextual factors have decision-makers considered in determining whether conduct which may seem innocuous on its face is\, in fact\, a subtle form of discrimination?\nWhat factors should be considered in determining whether systemic discrimination has adversely impacted an employee?\nWhat aspects of a hiring or promotion process will render that process more or less vulnerable to challenge as discriminatory?\nHow does the test for discrimination differ depending on the ground of discrimination that is alleged? For example\, what unique considerations apply when determining whether an employee has been discriminated against on the basis of religion?\nWhen will a rule or standard that on its face appears to be discriminatory be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement? When will accommodating an employee amount to undue hardship?\nWhen will employers be held liable for the discriminatory conduct of employees toward other employees in the workplace?\n\nScenarios will be finalized in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the most relevant cases. \nClosing Remarks: 4:00 pm PT \nWednesday\, April 16\, 2025Workshop*Workshop sold separately from stand-alone conference. \nConducting Inclusive\, Barrier-Free Workplace Investigations: A practical\, hands-on workshop with the experts\n\n\n \nTonie Beharrell\nLawyer and Workplace Investigator\nSouther Butler Price LLP \n\n\n \nDr. Renée-Louise Franche Ph.D.\, R. Psych.\nConsultant in Mental Health and Work Ability Promotion \n\n\n \nSara Hanson\nUnion Counsel\nMoore Edgar Lyster LLP \n\n\n \nJessica Thomson\nEmployer Counsel\nPulver Crawford Munroe \n\n\nThe investigation process is an important tool for addressing harassment and discrimination in the workplace. However\, investigations may risk perpetuating harm if they are not conducted carefully. In this workshop\, a panel of experts will discuss how to run investigations in a manner that supports the well-being of all parties involved and benefits the workplace at large. Throughout this full day workshop the panel will address the following questions: \n\nWhat is trauma\, and how may it affect complainants before\, during\, and after the investigation process?\nWhy is it important that workplace investigators adopt trauma-informed\, anti-oppressive\, and intersectional approaches to the investigation process\, especially when dealing with discrimination and harassment allegations?\nWhat steps should investigators take to address their own unconscious and implicit biases during the investigation process?\nWhat do trauma-informed\, anti-oppressive\, and intersectional approaches to workplace investigations involve in practice? For example\, how can investigators conduct interviews in a trauma-informed manner? What steps can they take to address parties’ accessibility needs throughout the investigation process? How can they bring inclusivity into their report writing?\nWhat is systemic discrimination\, and how can investigators effectively address claims of systemic discrimination in the investigation process?\nWhat interim measures can employers put in place during the investigation process to ensure the well-being of the parties involved?\nWhat recourse can complainants seek if they disagree with the investigator’s findings?\n\nVancouver Human Rights and Accommodation ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nCathy Knapp\nArbitrator and Mediator\nTribunal mediator\nBCHRT \n\n\n \nAndrew Schafer\nEmployer Counsel\nNorton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP \n\n\n \nLindsay Waddell\nUnion Counsel\nMoore Edgar Lyster LLP \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nMegan Ashbury\nArbitrator\, Mediator and Workplace Investigator \n\n\n \nMenachem Freedman\nUnion Counsel\nHHGB Lawyers \n\n\n \nDonovan Plomp\nEmployer Counsel\nMcCarthy Tetrault LLP \n\n\n \nKristen Woo\nLegal Counsel\nBC Public School Employers’ Association \n\n\n \nMatt Yun\nLegal and Legislative Representative\, CUPE \n\n\n \nLaura Track\nLaura Track\nHuman Rights Lawyer\nDirector\, Human Rights Clinic and Director\,\nPublic Legal Education\, Community Legal Assistance Society (CLAS) \n\n\nCPD Vancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n Vancouver Human Rights and Accommodation Conference Workshop CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\nThe Hyatt Regency Vancouver - Discounted Room\nGroup rates are now available with limited space availability: \n\n\n\nCheck-in\nCheck-out\nGroup rate\n\n\nTuesday\, April 15\nSaturday\, April 19\n$295/night\n\n\n\nCut-Off Date \nReservations made by attendees must be received on or before Tuesday\, March 25\, 2025\, after which any reservations made will be based on a space-and rate-available basis. \nOnline reservations \nClick here to book online. \nPhone line reservations: 1-800-233-1234
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/vancouver-human-rights-and-accommodation-conference-2025/
LOCATION:The Hyatt Regency Vancouver\, 655 Burrard Street.\, Vancouver\, B.C.\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Conference,Human Rights & Accommodation
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Vancouver-Human-Rights-and-Accommodation-Conference-2025.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250424T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250424T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20241115T201850Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250403T164200Z
UID:15353-1745497800-1745503200@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:One Strike and You’re Out: When will misconduct warrant immediate dismissal? When is progressive discipline required?
DESCRIPTION:In this webinar\, seasoned labour counsel will examine recent caselaw regarding when an employee’s misconduct may warrant immediate dismissal and when the application of progressive discipline may first be required. Panelists will address questions including: \nOption: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \n\nWhat types of conduct may warrant immediate dismissal without application of progressive discipline? How does the analysis differ as between unionized and non-unionized environments?\nWhat mitigating or aggravating factors in recent cases have impacted the determination as to whether immediate dismissal was warranted? How will an organization’s workplace culture affect the analysis?\nWill an employee’s immediate dismissal be found to be inappropriate if the employer imposed a different penalty on other employees engaging in similar misconduct?\nWhat is “condonation\,” and how will it impact the determination of whether immediate dismissal is warranted?\n\n\n\n\nHow will the determination be affected\, where:\n\na “penalty provision” stipulates a severe consequence for a specific type of workplace misconduct?\nthe employer has a “zero tolerance” policy in place?\nthere is a “last chance agreement” in place?\n\n\nWhen may an employer rely on earlier misconduct by an employee in support of more serious disciplinary consequences for subsequent misdeeds?\nWhat consequences flow from a court’s or arbitrator’s finding that an employer improperly failed to apply a progressive approach to discipline?\n\n\n\nModerator\n\n \nGordon Nekolaichuk\nVice-Chair\nAlberta Labour Relations Board \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nMarjorie Savoie\nNational Representative\nCanadian Union of Public Employees \n\n\n \nJustina Sebastiampillai\nEmployer Counsel\nStikeman Elliott LLP \n\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n \n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n \n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n \n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n 
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/one-strike-and-youre-out-when-will-misconduct-warrant-immediate-dismissal-when-is-progressive-discipline-required/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/One-Strike-and-Youre-Out.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250430
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250503
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20241021T154910Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250430T184338Z
UID:15154-1745971200-1746230399@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Toronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference 2025
DESCRIPTION:Stay Ahead in Employment Law\, Workplace Accommodation & DiversityJoin Canada’s premier Human Rights and Accommodation Conference in Toronto and gain expert insights into the latest employment law updates\, workplace accommodation training\, and diversity & inclusion strategies. Hosted by Lancaster House\, the trusted leader in legal education\, this event brings together top employment lawyers\, HR professionals\, business leaders\, and policymakers to discuss the most pressing issues in workplace human rights. \nWhat You’ll LearnAt the Toronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference 2025\, you’ll gain actionable insights on: \n\nHuman Rights Law Updates – Stay informed on recent tribunal decisions\, legislative changes\, and legal obligations for employers. \n\nWorkplace Accommodation Strategies – Learn how to effectively accommodate employees with disabilities and diverse needs while staying compliant. \n\nDiversity and Inclusion in the Workplace – Discover best practices for fostering equity\, inclusion\, and anti-discrimination policies. \n\nHR Legal Compliance & Best Practices – Understand your responsibilities in employee rights\, workplace fairness\, and accessibility requirements. \n\nReal-World Case Studies & Expert Panels – Hear directly from legal experts\, HR specialists\, and human rights advocates about emerging challenges and solutions. \nWho Should Attend?This conference is essential for: \n\nEmployment Lawyers & Legal Professionals – Stay ahead of evolving employment laws and gain insights on key case law decisions. \n\nHR Professionals & Business Leaders – Understand your obligations and responsibilities when implementing workplace accommodations and inclusion strategies. \n\nDiversity\, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Specialists – Learn best practices for fostering an inclusive\, discrimination-free workplace. \n\nUnion Representatives & Labor Advocates – Get the latest updates on human rights protections and fair labor policies. \nToronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Bundle: Conference + Workshop$2\,695.00Read more	\n			\n  \nToronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Pre-Conference Workshop$1\,095.00Read more	\n			\n  \nToronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Conference$2\,195.00Read more	\n			\n  \nToronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Day 1$1\,395.00Read more	\n			\n  \nToronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference – Day 2$1\,395.00Read more	\n			\n  \nWhy Choose Lancaster House?\nExpert-Led Sessions – Learn from Canada’s leading human rights lawyers\, policymakers\, and HR specialists. \n\nInteractive & Practical Training – Gain real-world\, applicable knowledge through case studies\, Q&A sessions\, and networking opportunities. \n\nAccredited Learning – Earn continuing legal education (CLE) credits while expanding your expertise. \n\nTrusted Legal Publisher – Lancaster House has been a leader in labor\, employment\, and human rights law education for over 40 years. \nWednesday\, April 30\, 2025Breakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am ET \nWorkshop*Workshop sold separately from stand-alone conference. \nWorkshop schedule: 9:00 am – 4:00 pm ET(The schedule will run concurrently for all three workshops until 4:00 pm) \nDisabilities that Elude Diagnosis: Accommodating employees with poorly understood conditions\n\n\n \nDr. Hy Bloom\nAssistant Professor\nPsychiatry\nUniversity of Toronto \n\n\n \nDiane Laranja\nEmployer Counsel\nFilion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP \n\n\n \nSara Slinn\nArbitrator/Mediator\nAssociate Professor\nOsgoode Hall Law School \n\n\n \nKen Stuebing\nUnion Counsel\nCaleywray \n\n\nChallenges often arise in accommodating employees with conditions that cannot be identified by a clear diagnostic test or that are not yet well-understood within the medical community. In this session\, panelists will examine key principles and best practices for accommodating employees with these conditions.  \nSpeakers will address: \n\nExamples of common medical conditions that elude diagnosis\, or that are considered “diagnoses of exclusion” (including “long COVID”);\nLegal limits on medical information that employers can request from employees;\nHow to formulate requests for medical information where an employee’s condition cannot be confirmed using a clinician’s diagnostic test;\nWhat to do when there are no available medical practitioners with the requisite knowledge or expertise to assess an employee’s condition;\nHow to approach\, with sensitivity\, employees/union members for needed medical information;\nDealing with stereotypes and stigmas associated with difficult-to-identify medical conditions;\nWhat types of accommodations will be of assistance to an employee suffering from persistent or chronic symptoms;\nWhether an employer can discipline or dismiss an employee who is frequently absent\, underperforming\, or exhibiting atypical workplace behaviours but who asserts that it is due to an as-yet undiagnosed disability; and\nDetermining when the duty to accommodate is at an end because undue hardship is unavoidable.\n\nDuring the workshop\, participants will engage in interactive exercises\, applying principles and practices learned throughout the day.\n \nThursday\, May 1\, 2025Breakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am ET \nOpening Remarks: 9:00 am – 9:05 am ET \nPanel 1 - Emerging Horizons in Human Rights: The latest cases and legislative developments - 9:05 am –10:35 am ET\n\n\n \nKristen Allen\nUnion Counsel\nUrsel Phillips Fellows Hopkinson LLP \n\n\n \nMatthew Craig\nEmployer Counsel\nMatthews\, Dinsdale & Clark LLP \n\n\n \nNimal Dissanayake\nArbitrator \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will delve into the numerous recent and significant developments in workplace human rights\, examining key cases and legislative changes. Speakers will discuss the latest cases addressing topics such as: \n\ntrends in discipline and damages for harassment and discrimination and evidentiary challenges in cases of allegations of harassment and discrimination;\nrights and restrictions involving employee expression of personal or political views and beliefs at work;\ntrends in discipline and damages for harassment and discrimination;\naccommodating neurodiverse employees;\nprivacy\, monitoring\, and surveillance;\nsubstance use and testing; and\nconflicts between health and safety obligations and human rights concerns.\n\nThe panel will also address recent Ontario and federal legislative initiatives\, including: \n\nrecent changes enacted through Ontario’s Working for Workers series of legislation addressing pay transparency\, the use of artificial intelligence\, harassment in virtual contexts\, and more; and\nongoing obligations for employers under the Ontario and federal Pay Equity Act.\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments.Break: 10:35 am –10:50 am ET \nPanel 2 - Human Rights in the Hybrid Workplace: Giving effect to employee accommodations in the context of a return-to-office mandate - 10:50 am –12:05 pm ET\n\n\n \nRishi Bandhu\nArbitrator/Mediator \nRishi Bandu Arbitration and Mediation Services \n\n\n \nCassandra da Costa\nEmployer Counsel\nFilion Wakely Thorup Angeletti \n\n\n \nPatricia D’Heureux\nUnion Counsel\nCavalluzzo LLP \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will examine the response to employee requests for accommodation through remote\, hybrid\, or other flexible work arrangements. The session will address questions including: \n\nDo employers have the right to require employees to return to in-person work? What aspects of a general return-to-office are vulnerable to challenge under human rights legislation or on other grounds? How does collective agreement language affect the matter?\nIn what circumstances have arbitrators and adjudicators found that employees must be permitted to work from home as a health-related accommodation? Does an employee’s demonstrated or perceived susceptibility to contracting COVID-19 or other illnesses warrant accommodation? Will employees be entitled to work from home during pregnancy or where a spouse or dependent may have increased susceptibility to infection?\nIn what circumstances have decision-makers found that employees should be permitted to work from home or on a remote or hybrid basis in order to accommodate obligations related to their family status\, such as childcare or eldercare responsibilities? What kinds of information can employers require to support such a request?\nHow can employers and unions distinguish an employee’s personal preferences from legitimate accommodation needs?\nWhen will insisting that an employee return to in-person work amount to a bona fide occupational requirement? When will an employer be able to establish that undue hardship will arise if an employee is allowed to work from home? Is an impact on broader employee morale sufficient to establish undue hardship?\nIs it discriminatory for an employer to impose additional performance monitoring practices on an employee engaged in remote or hybrid work — such as a requirement for regular check-ins\, use of timesheets\, etc.?\nBeyond legal considerations\, what practical considerations should be taken into account when assessing whether an employee should be permitted to work from home? What flexible working options other than remote or hybrid work can be considered? What benefits and drawbacks do remote\, hybrid\, or flexible working arrangements have for employees requiring accommodation?\nWhat best practices can employers and unions implement to ensure that employees being accommodated through remote\, hybrid\, or flexible work do not become isolated from the team?\n\nLunch: 12:05 pm – 1:00 pm ET \nPanel 3 - Human Rights Investigations: Assuring investigator neutrality\, setting standards for proper training\, providing employee support\, and other pivotal issues - 1:00 pm –2:15 pm ET\n\n\n \nChris Davidson\nAssociate Lawyer and Workplace Investigator\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\n \nWilliam Goldbloom\nWG Resolutions \n\n\n \nJodi Martin\nUnion Counsel\nPaliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP \n\n\nConducting a workplace investigation into human rights-related allegations is a complex process that requires fairness and a commitment to best practices. This panel will examine recent caselaw addressing workplace investigations with a view to providing guidance in conducting “best practices” investigations. The panel will address a series of questions including: \n\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent caselaw as to what constitutes a fair and adequate investigation process?\nWhat procedural flaws have been found to render an investigation unfair or inadequate — for instance\, flaws in timeliness\, thoroughness\, confidentiality\, and reporting?\nWhat steps should an employer take to address the impact of the human rights allegations? What actions should an employer take to prevent further discrimination?\nIs a formal investigation always required when an employee raises human rights-related concerns? What guidance do the courts and human rights tribunals provide? When might other options\, such as alternative dispute resolution\, be permissible or preferable?\nWhen is retaining a third-party investigator necessary?\nWhat is the role of a union in a workplace human rights investigation? What rights and/or responsibilities do unions have? What should unions do when both the complainant and the respondent are bargaining unit members?\nCan the grounds for an investigation be expanded after the investigation has commenced — for example\, if issues of systemic discrimination arise? What are the potential pitfalls of expanding the grounds of an investigation?\nWhat are best practices for countering unconscious and implicit bias and otherwise ensuring stereotypes and discrimination do not taint the investigatory process?\nHow should employers and unions respond when an investigation reveals bad faith allegations by an employee?\nWhat can the union and employer do to restore a safe and healthy workplace for all parties following an investigation?\n\nBreak: 2:15 pm –2:30 pm ET \nPanel 4 - Deep Dive into Discrimination: Experts examine scenarios to determine when it is\, and when it isn't - 2:30 pm –3:55 pm ET\n\n\n \nNicole Biros-Bolton\nFounder and Lawyer\nBird Bolt Law \n\n\n \nAmandi Esonwanne\nSolicitor\nCity of Toronto \n\n\n \nMorgan Sim\nLawyer & Founder\nMorgan Sim Law \n\n\nIn this interactive session\, panelists will address scenarios based on real cases involving allegations of discrimination\, examining legal principles for identifying and addressing subtle and systemic forms of discrimination as well as meeting obligations such as the duty to accommodate. Panelists will address questions such as: \n\nHow have arbitrators and human rights tribunals resolved evidentiary and credibility challenges when determining whether discrimination has occurred?\nWhat contextual factors have decision-makers considered in determining whether conduct which may seem innocuous on its face is\, in fact\, a subtle form of discrimination?\nWhat factors should be considered in determining whether systemic discrimination has adversely impacted an employee?\nWhat aspects of a hiring or promotion process will render that process more or less vulnerable to challenge as discriminatory?\nHow does the test for discrimination differ depending on the ground of discrimination that is alleged? For example\, what unique considerations apply when determining whether an employee has been discriminated against on the basis of religion?\nWhen will a rule or standard that on its face appears to be discriminatory be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement? When will accommodating an employee amount to undue hardship?\nWhen will employers be held liable for the discriminatory conduct of employees toward other employees in the workplace?\n\nScenarios will be finalized in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the most relevant cases. \nClosing remarks: 3:55 pm –3:50 pm ET \nFriday\, May 2\, 2025Breakfast: 8:00 am – 9:00 am ET \nIntroduction: 9:00 am – 9:05 am ET \nPanel 5 - Beyond Repair? Examining the use of discipline and restorative solutions in response to human rights transgressions at work - 9:05 am – 10:20 am ET\n\n\n \nLorenzo Lisi\nEmployer Counsel\nAird & Berlis LLP \n\n\n \nAmer Mushtaq\nLawyer and investigator\nFormative LLP \n\n\n \nLauren Pearce\nUnion Counsel\nJones Pearce LLP \n\n\nIn this session\, expert panelists will examine legal obligations and best practices in responding effectively and appropriately to harassment and discrimination at work. Panelists will address questions including: \n\nWhat legal obligations govern an employer’s response to discrimination and harassment in the workplace? When is the duty to investigate triggered?\nAre employers obligated to impose discipline when employees have committed human rights violations at work? Where discipline is imposed\, what types of conduct may warrant more severe consequences? What considerations have arbitrators in recent cases taken into account in determining whether an employment relationship is salvageable following an employee’s human rights transgression?\nWhen can or should alternative dispute resolution (ADR) be used to address human rights violations at work? Can ADR be used in lieu of discipline? What ADR options exist\, and what are the relative advantages and disadvantages of each?\nBeyond legal considerations\, what practical considerations may impact whether use of ADR is appropriate? What power imbalances\, “invisible” barriers\, and other barriers to equity should be taken into account? What steps can parties take to address these barriers? What is a “trauma-informed approach\,” and how may it be beneficial in addressing human rights transgressions at work?\nWhat steps can or must employers and unions take that ensure a healthy and safe work environment is restored following a human rights violation? What steps should be taken where both the complainant and transgressor remain at work?\n\nBreak: 10:20 am – 10:35 am ET \nKeynote Speech by Cynthia Khoo - Of Data and Dissent: The Pursuit of Algorithmic Justice in Labour and Human Rights - 10:35 am – 11:05 am ET\n\n\n \nCynthia Khoo\nTechnology and Human Rights Lawyer\nSenior Fellow\nThe Citizen Lab \n\n\nWith every advent of a new technological phase — whether social media\, big data\, machine learning algorithms\, or generative artificial intelligence (AI) — one fundamental task among many falls to legal scholars and practitioners\, adjudicators\, and lawmakers to confront: determining what the new technology changes\, what it does not\, and where and how the differences matter (legally and otherwise). To that end\, this talk will address issues such as how algorithmic discrimination differs from “analogue” discrimination; how society and our laws should view human labour in a time when so much more of it seems instantly replicable by machines; and the connection between how automated decision-making works and proposed changes to liability frameworks when it comes to AI. \nWhat will become clear through this discussion is one thing that has never changed: technology is about power. Questions of technology thus carry particular weight in contexts built around systemic power imbalances\, whether as a matter of workplace relations or human rights law. Drawing on a panoply of work by lawyers\, academics\, researchers\, and grassroots community experts in various interdisciplinary combinations of law\, computer science\, labour\, human rights\, science and technology studies\, and algorithmic accountability scholarship\, this keynote will challenge the audience to reconceptualize AI not as a “neutral tool” or coherent technical object\, but as\, to quote anthropologist and computer scientist Ali Alkhatib\, “an ideological project to shift” power\, and consider the consequences of ignoring what that means for our legal and human rights. \nBreak: 11:05 am – 11:20 am ET \nPanel 6 - Clocking In\, Speaking Out: Squaring employee free speech and employer rights - 11:20 am – 12:15 pm ET\n\n\n \nKim Bernhardt\nArbitrator/Mediator \n\n\n \nKerri Kitchura\nSolicitor\nCity of Toronto \n\n\n \nGregory Ko\nUnion Counsel\nKastner Ko LLP \n\n\nHow can workplaces best manage the balance between an employee’s right to express themselves freely against an employer’s obligation to create\, foster\, and maintain a safe and respectful workplace for all? The panel will address: \n\nTo what extent\, if any\, can employers limit political expression in the workplace? How may this differ for public-sector employees?\nWhen will the expression of political views rise to the threshold of discrimination and/or harassment?\nWhat must employers consider when monitoring and responding to their employees’ off-work expressions\, particularly on social media? At what point does off-work employee conduct warrant discipline by the employer\, and are there limits on how an employer can discipline an employee for this conduct?\nWhat should employers consider when investigating incidents of alleged harmful or disrespectful employee expression? What are some characteristics of an effective investigation into these incidents?\nCan employers discipline employees for political expressions that are expressed outside of the workplace? For example\, can an employer discipline an employee for offensive posts made on social media?\nWhen are unions required to represent members who experience discipline for political expression? What does the union’s duty of fair representation require in these circumstances?\nHow should employers communicate expectations regarding appropriate workplace and off-work conduct? How should employers approach restoring workplace harmony after employee expression creates conflict in the workplace?\n\nLunch: 12:15 pm – 1:15 pm ET \nPanel 7 - Wellness in the Workplace: Expert guidance on proactively recognizing and responding to employee mental health concerns - 1:15 pm – 2:30 pm ET\n\n\n \nDr. Sahar Bhaloo\nClinical Psychologist\nFlourish Mental Health and Coaching Services \n\n\n \nSandy Donaldson\nLabour Relations Officer\nOntario Nurses’ Association (ONA) \n\n\n \nSimmy Sahdra\nEmployer Counsel\nDentons \n\n\nIn this panel\, experts will provide guidance on how employers and unions can proactively identify and address mental health concerns in the workplace. The following questions will be discussed: \n\nWhat are the characteristics of a workplace that is psychologically healthy and safe? What steps can employers and unions take to create a workplace culture that supports mental well-being?\nWhat are employee responsibilities to maintain a psychologically healthy and safe workplace? How can employers and unions empower their employees/members to meet those responsibilities?\nHow can employers and unions identify mental health threats in the workplace? What tools and resources are available to assist in this process?\nWhat strategies should employers and unions apply to proactively recognize and address addiction and substance abuse in the workplace?\nWhat should employers and unions consider when creating employee wellness programs? What can cause these wellness programs to fail? How can employers and unions effectively assess the success of their wellness programs?\n\nBreak: 2:30 pm – 2:45 pm ET \nPanel 8 - The Road to Return: Implementing workplace disability management while respecting human rights - 2:45 pm – 4:00 pm ET\n\n\n \nLucas Mapplebeck\nEmployer Counsel\nFilion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP \n\n\n \nAli Mohamed\nManager\, Equity\, Diversity\, Inclusion\, and Accessibility for People with Disabilities\, Canada Post \n\n\n \nLauren Sheffield\nUnion Counsel\nCavalluzzo LLP \n\n\nCreating\, implementing\, and maintaining an effective and successful workplace disability management system ensures employers are fostering a healthy\, safe\, and inclusive workplace. In this session\, the panel will discuss how best to accomplish these goals through discussion of the following questions: \n\nWhat are the essential components of a comprehensive workplace disability management system? How can employers and unions build an effective system?\nWhat tools\, resources\, and/or training can be used to assist in creating\, implementing\, and maintaining a successful workplace disability management system?\nWhat measures can workplaces institute to both prevent work disability and help employees with disabilities remain safe at work?\nHow can employers and employees with disabilities meet their responsibilities under the duty to accommodate? How should employers and unions support employees with episodic or invisible disabilities?\nWhat can employers and unions do to ensure that employees experience a successful return to work after a leave of absence due to disability?\nWhat should employers and unions consider when evaluating the effectiveness of their workplace disability management system?\n\nClosing remarks: 4:00 pm ET \nToronto Human Rights and Accommodation ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nKathryn Bird\nEmployer Counsel\nOgletree Deakins International LLP \n\n\n \nDanielle Bisnar\nUnion Counsel\nCavalluzzo LLP \n\n\n \nMatthew Horner\nLegal Counsel\nOntario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n  \n\n \nTricia Wilson\nNational Human Rights Representative\nUnifor \n\n\n \nRon Franklin\nUnion Counsel\nFranklin Law \n\n\n \nLaura Freitag\nEmployer Counsel\nFilion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP \n\n\n \nKumail Karimjee\nArbitrator\, Mediator\, and Investigator\nKarimjee Resolutions \n\n\n \nBrandy Ryan\nDirector\, Equity\, Diversity and Inclusion\nCanada Post \n\n\nCPDToronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 10.59 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 10.59 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\n\n\n\n\nToronto Human Rights and Accommodation Conference Workshop CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 5.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 5.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\n\n\n\n\nHotels nearbyHilton145 Richmond Street West\nToronto\, ON\nM5H 2L2Visit hotel websiteOne King West Hotel1 King Street West\nToronto\, ON\nM5H 1A1Visit hotel websiteHyatt Regency Toronto370 King St W\,\nToronto ON\nM5V 1J9Visit hotel website
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/toronto-human-rights-and-accommodation-conference-2025/
LOCATION:Vantage Venues\, 150 King Street West\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5H 1J9\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Conference,Human Rights & Accommodation
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/toronto-hra-banner-2025.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250508T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250508T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20241115T201926Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250430T184634Z
UID:15352-1746707400-1746712800@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Relative Accommodations: An update on family status discrimination (childcare\, eldercare\, spousal responsibilities\, etc.)
DESCRIPTION:The applicable test for prima facie discrimination on the basis of family status varies across jurisdictions\, creating uncertainty in the absence of definitive guidance from the Supreme Court of Canada. This panel will critically examine how decision-makers address the growing range of family status claims and explore emerging trends in this area of law. Specifically\, panelists will address: \nOption: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \n\nWhat are the various tests for establishing prima facie discrimination based on family status in Canada — including the Moore\, Johnstone\, Misetech\, and Campbell River tests — and in which jurisdictions are they applied?\nWhat approach do decision-makers take to family status discrimination cases in Ontario? What is the Johnstone test and is it still good law? What is the impact of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal’s Misetech v. Value Village Stores Inc. decision? What approach have decision-makers taken post Misetech?\nWhat is the current legal approach to family status discrimination in British Columbia? What impact has the B.C. Court of Appeal’s Gibraltar Mines decision had on family status discrimination claims in the province?\n\n\nWhat forms of caregiving fall under the scope of family status protection? Which relationships are protected? What types of activities\, responsibilities\, and obligations flowing from these relationships give rise to legal protection?\nWhat constitutes a serious interference with a family obligation such that it will amount to family status discrimination? How can employers and unions distinguish between protected family responsibilities and personal preferences?\nWhat kinds of accommodations have courts recognized as reasonable accommodations? What qualifies as “undue hardship” for an employer when it comes to family status accommodation?\nWhat are the emerging trends in damage awards for discrimination\, failure to accommodate\, and reprisals relating to family status claims?\n\nModerator\n  \n\n \nKrista Smith\nFounder\, Root & Branch – Workplace Conflict Resolutions Inc.\n \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nDayna Steinfeld\nUnion Counsel\nRavenlaw LLP \n\n\n \nMelanie Vipond\nEmployer Counsel\nGall Legg Grant Zwack \n\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/relative-accommodations-an-update-on-family-status-discrimination-childcare-eldercare-spousal-responsibilities-etc/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Relative-Accommodations2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250520
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250522
DTSTAMP:20260404T020107
CREATED:20240820T164441Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250516T173928Z
UID:14650-1747699200-1747871999@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Atlantic Labour Law Conference 2025
DESCRIPTION:Tuesday\, May 20\, 2025Workshop*Workshop sold separately from stand-alone conference. \nWorkshop schedule: 9:00 am – 4:00 pm AT\n(The schedule will run concurrently for all three workshops until 4:00 pm) \nFrom Conflict to Calm: Experts examine proactive and restorative strategies to address workplace conflict\n\n\n \nChris Hattie\nAssociate Vice-President of People and Culture\, Mount Saint Vincent University \n\n\n \nDaniel Wilband\nCounsel\nVanBuskirk Law \n\n\n \nShelley Roach Dumouchel\nDumouchel Dispute Resolution \n\n\nIn the modern polarized world\, how can employers and unions work together to effectively resolve and minimize workplace conflict before it escalates? This interactive workshop provides practical strategies for identifying and addressing conflict. Through panel discussions and hands-on exercises\, attendees will learn to: \n\nIdentify common sources of workplace conflict\, including personality clashes\, differing beliefs\, and interpersonal communication issues.\nUnderstand the distinct roles of unions and employers in resolving disputes\, investigating complaints\, and fostering a harmonious workplace.\nComply with legal requirements for addressing workplace conflict (e.g.\, health and safety requirements\, wrongful dismissal claims\, duties to investigate\, duties of fair representation\, duties to accommodate).\nRecognize when and how employers and unions must monitor or intervene\, including in circumstances where questionable behaviour occurs outside the workplace.\nDevelop clear workplace policies that outline acceptable behavior\, detail internal complaint procedures\, and set guidelines for initiating and conducting investigations and mediation processes.\n\nWednesday\, May 21\, 2025Introduction: 9:00 am – 9:05 am AT \nPanel 1: The Latest in Labour: Significant recent cases and legislative developments - 9:05 am – 10:20 am AT\n\n\n \nGeoffrey Breen\nEmployer Counsel\nCox & Palmer \n\n\n \nDale Darling\, K.C.\nMediator and Arbitrator \n\n\n \nChristina R. Kennedy\nSenior Labour Relations Counsel\nAir Line Pilots Association\, International \n\n\nIn this session\, experts will examine recent significant developments in federal and provincial labour law. Panelists will address the latest cases on topics including: \n\nthe legality of recent federal government interventions pausing or prohibiting strikes in the railway\, postal\, and other sectors;\nimplications of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Quebec Casino case denying collective bargaining rights to front line supervisors;\nQuebec Court of Appeal decision upholding role of unions in selection of interest arbitrators;\ndiscrimination\, harassment\, and accommodation;\nemployee expression of political views and/or religious beliefs at work;\ntrends in discipline and damage awards;\nupdates on privacy\, surveillance\, and monitoring;\nremote work — employer discretion and employee entitlement;\nissues of justification for substance use testing; and\noccupational health and safety — liability and damages.\n\nPanelists will also address recent legislative and regulatory developments\, such as: \n\nupdated government guidance regarding requirements under federal supply chain transparency legislation;\nnew collaborative return-to-work obligations introduced under Nova Scotia’s workers’ compensation legislation;\nNew Brunswick’s new accessibility legislation;\nnew sick leave employee entitlements and restrictions on employers’ entitlements to medical notes for short-term sick leave; and\nNew Quebec legislation on arbitrator selection and government powers to pause or prohibit strikes.\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments in a changing economic and political landscape. \nBreak: 10:20 am – 10:35 am AT \nPanel 2: About Time: Examining time theft\, performance\, and productivity in the age of AI and remote work - 10:35 am – 11:35 am AT\n\n\n \nLucia DeMaio\nLabour Relations Lawyer\nAssociation of University of New Brunswick Teachers (AUNBT) \n\n\n \nChris Peddigrew\nArbitrator\, Mediator and Investigator \nPeddigrew Wade Law \nVice-Chairperson\nNewfoundland and Labrador Labour Relations Board \n\n\n \nTwila Reid\nEmployer Counsel\nStewart McKelvey \n\n\n \nJake van der Laan\nProfessor\nDepartment of Computer Science\nUniversity of New Brunswick \n\n\nCan employers monitor employee activity to ensure wages correspond to hours worked? In this webinar\, experts will examine the impact of AI and remote workplaces on work habits\, provide practical guidance on the scope and limitations of workplace surveillance\, and discuss arbitrator responses to claims of employee “time theft.” Panelists will address: \n\nWhat constitutes employee “time theft”?\nHow can AI be used for workplace surveillance? What steps should workplaces take to develop policies that comply with Bill C-27\, the Digital Charter Implementation Act (which includes the introduction of the Artificial Intelligence Data Act)?\nIs the nature of the workplace relevant when implementing surveillance? Is the sensitivity of the information relevant?\nIs reasonable suspicion of “time theft” required before implementing workplace surveillance? Can surveillance originally implemented for safety or security purposes be used to monitor employee productivity?\nIs the scope of surveillance different for remote workers?\nWhat disciplinary measures do adjudicators and arbitrators consider appropriate for “time theft”?\nAre there limits to an employer’s retention and use of employee information obtained through surveillance?\n\nBreak: 11:35 am – 11:50 am AT \nKeynote Speech by Michael Marin\, K.C. - Employee Privacy in the MUSH Sector and Beyond - 11:50 am – 12:20 pm AT\n\n\n \nMichael Marin\, K.C.\nDean and Associate Professor\nFaculty of Law\nUniversity of New Brunswick \n\n\nFollowing the Supreme Court’s judgment in York Region District School Board v. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario\, the extent to which s.8 of the Charter protects the privacy of employees in the public sector has become one of the most talked about workplace law issues in Canada. While labour arbitrators have long recognized the privacy rights of employees\, they often did so without explicit reference to the Charter. In addition\, York and other cases suggest that the Charter may soon extend to other workplaces in the “MUSH” sector\, notably universities\, which have long been considered Charter-free zones. At the same time\, the blending of personal and work-related uses of technology has resulted in a line of arbitral cases that applies Charter-like reasoning to private sector workplaces. \nThis presentation will discuss York‘s practical implications for both public and private sector workplaces. Although the Charter does not generally apply to the private sector\, the judgment’s emphasis on the employment context in assessing the reasonableness of a search is useful guidance. And the Supreme Court’s “Charter-always” approach will have implications for how counsel and arbitrators tackle cases that engage privacy concerns in the public sector. Overall\, these developments reflect a trend toward formalizing the recognition of employees’ right to privacy no matter where they work. But\, in typical Charter fashion\, this right is not absolute and may be invaded by employers for legitimate reasons and if personal information is not unduly exposed. \nLunch Break: 12:20 pm – 1:20 pm AT \nPanel 3: What's Fresh in Fact-Finding? The latest on best practices for fair and effective workplace investigations - 1:20 pm – 2:30 pm AT\n\n\n \nJudy Begley\nLawyer\, Workplace Investigator\, and Mediator\nBegley Law \n\n\n \nJoël Michaud\nUnion Counsel\nPink Larkin \n\n\n \nKathleen O’Neill\, K.C.\nEmployer Counsel\nCox & Palmer \n\n\nConducting workplace investigations is a delicate and complex process that demands fairness\, precision\, and a commitment to best practices. The panel will examine recent caselaw addressing workplace investigations and will explore key principles\, best practices\, and emerging guidance about conducting reasonable and effective investigations. The panel will address a series of questions including: \n\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent caselaw as to what constitutes a fair and adequate investigation process?\nWhat are best practices for countering unconscious and implicit bias and otherwise ensuring stereotypes and discrimination do not impact the investigatory process?\nWhat is the role of the union in an investigation? What are the limitations of union involvement?\nHow much latitude do employers have to order investigations into off-duty conduct? Can workplace investigators request access to employees’ personal devices\, such as laptops or cellphones\, used primarily or exclusively for personal purposes?\nWhat strategies can workplace parties implement to address the challenges of conducting investigations in a remote work environment? Is there any proven or perceived benefit to conducting workplace investigations in-person?\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent caselaw about what information is protected in the investigative process?\nIn what circumstances have arbitrators given remedies for an employer’s failure to investigate allegations?\nWhat should employers and unions be looking for when reviewing investigation reports?\n\nBreak: 2:30 pm – 2:45 pm AT \nPanel 4: Is it Discrimination? Or Isn’t It? An interactive panel seeks answers from actual case studies - 2:45 pm – 4:00 pm AT\n\n\n \nGreg Anthony\nEmployer Counsel\nMcInnes Cooper \n\n\n \nCarey Majid\nExecutive Director\nNewfoundland and Labrador Human Rights Commission \n\n\n \nKyle Rees\nUnion Counsel\nO’Dea Earle \n\n\nIn this interactive session\, panelists will address scenarios based on real cases involving allegations of discrimination\, examining legal principles for identifying and addressing subtle\, systemic\, and complex forms of discrimination as well as meeting obligations such as the duty to accommodate. Panelists will address questions such as: \n\nHow have arbitrators and human rights tribunals resolved evidentiary and credibility challenges when determining whether discrimination has occurred?\nWhat contextual factors have decision-makers considered in determining whether conduct which may seem innocuous on its face is\, in fact\, a subtle form of discrimination?\nWhat matters should be considered in determining whether systemic discrimination has adversely impacted an employee?\nHow does the test for discrimination differ depending on the ground of discrimination that is alleged? For example\, what unique considerations apply when determining whether an employee has been discriminated against on the basis of religion?\nWhen will a rule or standard that on its face appears to be discriminatory be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement? When will accommodating an employee amount to undue hardship?\nIn what circumstances will employers be held liable for the discriminatory conduct of employees toward other employees in the workplace?\n\nScenarios will be finalized in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the most relevant cases. \nClosing remarks: 4:00 pm AT \nAtlantic Labour Law Conference Bundle: Conference + Pre-Conference Workshop$1\,495.00Read more	\n			\n  \nAtlantic Labour Law Conference – Pre-Conference Workshop$895.00Read more	\n			\n  \nAtlantic Labour Law Conference$995.00Read more	\n			\n  \nAtlantic Labour Law ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nJamie Eddy\nEmployer Counsel\nCox and Palmer \n\n\n \nSophie Landry Mockler\nLegal Counsel\nNew Brunswick Union (NBU) \n\n\n \nLynne Poirier\nArbitrator/Mediator\nVice-Chairperson\nCanada Industrial Relations Board \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nBrenda Comeau\nUnion Counsel\nPink Larkin \n\n\n \nMichael Keliher\nLabour Relations Lawyer\nAssociation of University of New Brunswick Teachers (AUNBT) \n\n\n \nTracy McPhee\nLegal Counsel\nLabour Relations & Compensation Analysis\nHealth Association Nova Scotia \n\n\n \nIan Pickard\nEmployer Counsel\nMcInnes Cooper \n\n\nCPDConference CPD\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Nova Scotia for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of CPHR Newfoundland & Labrador may consider counting this program for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the CPHR PEI may consider counting this program for 5.25 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nWorkshop CPD\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Nova Scotia for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 5.3 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of CPHR Newfoundland & Labrador may consider counting this program for 5.3 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the CPHR PEI may consider counting this program for 5.3 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/atlantic-labour-law-conference-2025/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Conference,Labour Law & Labour Policy
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Atlantic-Labour-Law-Conference-2025-banner.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250522T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250522T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020108
CREATED:20241115T202027Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250430T184732Z
UID:15351-1747917000-1747922400@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:The Consequences of Dishonesty: At what point does dishonesty become a fireable offence or preclude reinstatement? Does it depend on the context?
DESCRIPTION:Dishonesty and breaches of trust are among the most serious types of workplace misconduct\, often justifying disciplinary action. But when does dishonesty rise to the level of justifying termination? In this session\, practitioners will examine the factors that arbitrators and courts consider when deciding whether dishonest behaviour warrants termination. Specifically\, panelists will address: \nOption: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \n\nWhat approach do Canadian courts and labour arbitrators take when considering whether or not to uphold a discharge for dishonest conduct? When is “automatic discharge” warranted?\nWhat guidance do labour arbitrators provide about the relevance of mitigating and aggravating factors in cases of dishonesty and breach of trust? What is the impact of the Supreme Court’s McKinley decision in which the Court held that discipline must be proportional to the particular form of dishonesty involved?\nWhat evidence is required to establish that an employee has engaged in dishonest behaviour? What responsibility does the grievor have to provide an exculpatory explanation? What is the “duty to explain” and how does it interact with the burden of proof in dishonesty cases?\n\n\nHow will arbitrators view the dishonest recording of attendance or the dishonest use of sick time?\nHow do arbitrators view misuse of worktime? When does it rise to the level of time theft? Are some kinds of misuse of worktime more serious than others?\nWill off-duty dishonest conduct that is criminal in nature justify discharge? If it is unrelated to the employee’s job?\nWhere dishonesty is causally related to an employee’s disability\, must the employer accommodate the employee rather than dismissing the employee?\n\nModerator\n\n \nJames Cameron\nArbitrator/Mediator\nCameron Mediation Arbitration \n\n\nSpeakers\n  \n\n \nGreg Bartel\nUnion Counsel\nMyers LLP \n\n\n \nDaniel Weber\nEmployer Counsel\nMcLennan Ross LLP \n\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/the-consequences-of-dishonesty-at-what-point-does-dishonesty-become-a-fireable-offence-or-preclude-reinstatement-does-it-depend-on-the-context/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/The-Consequences-of-Dishonesty2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250603T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250626T160000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020108
CREATED:20250228T183941Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250605T183915Z
UID:16138-1748953800-1750953600@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Labour Relations Certificate - Spring/Summer 2025 (Virtual Program)
DESCRIPTION:In association with: \nUpon completion of this program\, participants will receive a certificate of completion and a digital credential. \nProgram Leader \n\nDaphne Taras\nProfessor Emerita\nToronto Metropolitan University (TMU) \nProgram Faculty \n\n\n \nLeanne Anderson\nMember Services Officer\, Advocacy\nUBC Association of Administrative and Professional Staff \n\n\n \nSharan Basran\nChief Legal Officer\, Legal Counsel\nOntario Nurses’ Association (ONA) \n\n\n \nAlex Brat\nSenior Executive Director\, Labour Relations\nUniversity of Toronto \n\n\n \nBruce Curran\nAssociate Professor\nFaculty of Law\nUniversity of Manitoba \n\n\n \nChris Davidson\nLawyer & Workplace Investigator\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\n \nShana French\nEmployer Counsel\nLittler LLP \n\n\n \nAvner Levin\nProfessor\nLincoln Alexander School of Law\nTed Rogers School of Management\nToronto Metropolitan University (TMU) \n\n\n \nNiki Lundquist\nSenior Director of Equity and Education\nUnifor \n\n\n \nIan Mackenzie\nWriter\, Trainer\, Consultant\, and Facilitator \n\n\n \nDionne Pohler\nAssociate Professor\nUniversity of Saskatchewan \n\n\n \nShannon Sproule\nEmployer Counsel\nTurnpenney Milne LLP \n\n\n \nJim Stanford\nEconomist and Director\nCentre for Future Work\nAustralia Institute \n\n\n \nBob Thompson\nProfessor\, Human Resources\nSeneca Polytechnic \n\n\n\nProgram\nThe Labour Relations Certificate Program\, presented by Toronto Metropolitan University and Lancaster House\, is designed to provide individuals engaged in labour relations with the core skills and knowledge required to create and maintain productive union-management relationships that foster fair and efficient workplaces. \nTaught by Canada’s leading labour relations scholars and practitioners\, this program combines theory\, leading research\, and professional experience to provide an education that has immediate application in participants’ workplaces. \n\nAccess to leading Canadian experts in a small-group setting\nActive learning through group discussion\, case studies\, and simulations\nBalanced coverage of labour and management points of view\nManagement\, union\, and neutral attendees learn together\nExposure to diverse opinions and extensive knowledge of fellow participants\nVariety of speakers (academics\, lawyers\, practitioners\, subject-matter experts)\n\n\nWho should attend? \n\nHuman resources professionals\nUnion officers and representatives\nLawyers\nManagers\nMediators\nWorkplace investigators\n\n\n2025 Spring/Summer Schedule† \nThe Spring/Summer 2025 session of the Labour Relations Certificate Program will comprise of 8 sessions over 4 weeks\, and will take place on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. ET beginning June 3\, 2025. \n\nSample Agenda\n\nVideo\n\nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA)\, per session\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 3.5 substantive hours; 0 professionalism hours\, per session.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may consider counting this program for 3.5 Continuing Professional Development hours\, per session.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/labour-relations-certificate-spring-summer-2025-virtual-program/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Professional Learning Program
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/header/TMU-header.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250605T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250605T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020108
CREATED:20241115T202103Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250605T135946Z
UID:15350-1749126600-1749132000@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Annual Update on Gender Equity: The latest cases and legislative developments
DESCRIPTION:In this webinar\, practitioners will examine recent noteworthy cases and legislative developments relating to gender equity in the workplace. Speakers will address questions such as: \nOption: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n  \n\nWhen can an employer discipline\, an employee for expressing controversial or discriminatory views regarding gender equity at work? What rights and restrictions exist with respect to employees expressing views regarding gender equity in the workplace? When will free speech rights prevail?\nWhat factors relating to gender equity have been found to render hiring processes discriminatory in recent cases? How can employers and unions ensure that hiring and promotion processes are equitable and do not reinforce systemic barriers to advancement?\nWhat trends in discipline and damages are emerging in recent cases dealing with sexual harassment and discrimination on the basis of sex\, gender\, sexual orientation\, and/or family status?\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent cases addressing the procedure for investigating discrimination and harassment claims related to gender equity concerns?\nHow have arbitrators\, courts\, and human rights tribunals resolved evidentiary challenges relating to establishing sexual harassment and discrimination on the basis of sex\, gender\, sexual orientation\, and/or family status? Is direct evidence of discrimination required? When may expert evidence be necessary?\n\n\n\nWhen will an employer’s refusal to allow an employee to work from home be considered discriminatory on the basis of the employee’s pregnancy and/or family status?\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent cases addressing legislative pay equity requirements? For example:\n\nAre employers required to disclose information on an ongoing basis relating to the maintenance of legislative pay equity?\nWhen are disputes regarding legislative pay equity requirements grievable/arbitrable?\n\n\nWhat federal and provincial legislative initiatives have recently been enacted addressing issues of gender equity? For example\, which provinces have recently passed pay transparency legislation and how do these legislative enactments differ in their requirements? What changes have been implemented through Ontario’s Working for Workers legislation? What is the status of the federal government’s proposed amendments to the federal Employment Equity Act?\n\n\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the webinar\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments. \nModerator \n\n\n \nHeather Hoiness\nStaff Lawyer\nBC Office of the Human Rights Commissioner \n\n\n\nSpeakers \n\n\n \nKristine Barr\nLegal Representative\,\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (Manitoba Regional Office) \n\n\n \nLauren Jamieson\nPartner\nEmond Harnden LLP \n\n\n \nNatasha Savoline\nPartner and Investigations Practice Lead\nBernardi Law \n\n\n\nAccreditation \nCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/annual-update-on-gender-equity-the-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Annual-Update-on-Gender-Equity-The-latest-cases-and-legislative-developments.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250612
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250614
DTSTAMP:20260404T020108
CREATED:20240813T154727Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250612T134137Z
UID:14571-1749686400-1749859199@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:43rd Annual Calgary Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference
DESCRIPTION:Navigating Labour Relations\, Arbitration\, and Employment Policies in AlbertaWhat is the Calgary Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference 2025?The Calgary Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference 2025 is designed to provide HR professionals\, labour relations specialists\, legal practitioners\, and union representatives with the latest insights into labour arbitration\, employment law\, and workplace policies. Hosted by Lancaster House\, this two-day conference offers a comprehensive program featuring expert-led workshops\, keynote speeches\, and interactive sessions focused on the unique challenges and developments in Alberta’s labour landscape. \nPre-Conference Workshop – Calgary Labour Arbitration and Policy ConferenceRead more	\n			\n  \nCalgary Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference & Pre-Conference WorkshopRead more	\n			\n  \nCalgary Labour Arbitration and Policy ConferenceRead more	\n			\n  \nWhat We’re CoveringThis year’s conference addresses critical topics shaping the future of labour relations and employment policies: \n\nEssentials of Advocacy in Mediation – Strategies for effective preparation and delivery in the mediation process. \n\nConducting Fair and Bias-Free Investigations – Practical approaches to ensure integrity and impartiality in workplace investigations. \n\nAccommodating Elusive Disabilities – Best practices for obtaining medical information and creating appropriate accommodations. \n\nLabour Relations in Uncertain Times – Exploring the implications of economic and political climates on the world of work. \n\nTechnological Change and Workplace Privacy – Addressing issues related to surveillance\, monitoring\, and privacy in the digital age. \n\nImplementing Equity\, Diversity\, and Inclusion (EDI) – Strategies for fostering inclusive environments within unionized workplaces. \nWho Should Attend?This conference is tailored for professionals involved in labour relations and employment law: \n\nHR Managers and Directors – Enhance your understanding of arbitration processes and policy development. \n\nLabour Relations Specialists – Stay informed on the latest arbitration cases and legislative changes. \n\nLegal Practitioners – Gain insights into emerging trends and case law in labour and employment sectors. \n\nUnion Representatives – Learn effective advocacy and negotiation strategies. \n\nCorporate Executives – Understand the impact of labour policies on organizational operations. \nKey Learning OutcomesBy attending\, you will: \n\nDevelop skills to conduct impartial and thorough workplace investigations. \n\nUnderstand legal requirements and best practices for accommodating disabilities. \n\nAnalyze the impact of economic and political factors on labour relations. \n\nNavigate challenges posed by technological advancements in workplace privacy. \n\nImplement effective EDI initiatives within unionized environments. \nWhy Choose Lancaster House?With a legacy of excellence in legal publishing and labour arbitration insights\, Lancaster House is committed to delivering high-quality educational experiences. Our conferences are curated by leading experts\, ensuring participants receive current\, relevant\, and practical information applicable to their professional roles. \n\nExpert-Led Sessions – Learn from distinguished professionals in labour law and arbitration. \n\nComprehensive Materials – Access detailed resources and case studies. \n\nNetworking Opportunities – Connect with peers and industry leaders. \n\nPractical Insights – Gain strategies ready for immediate implementation. \nThursday\, June 12\, 2025Breakfast: 8:00 am – 8:40 am MT \nIntroductory remarks: 9:00 am – 9:10 am MT \nPre-Conference Concurrent Workshops (Choice of 1 of 3)*Workshops sold separately from stand-alone conference. \nWorkshop schedule: 9:00 am – 4:00 pm MT\n(The schedule will run concurrently for all three workshops until 4:00 pm) \nWorkshop 1 - Essentials of Advocacy in the Mediation Process: Strategy\, preparation and delivery \n\n\n \nWilson Chan\nEmployer Counsel\nMathews\, Dinsdale & Clark LLP \n\n\n \nPaulette DeKelver\nMediator\nDeKelver Dispute Resolution \n\n\n \nElla Henry\nCounsel\nCanadian Union of Public Employees \n\n\n \nBruce Moffatt\nMediator\nBM consulting \n\n\nThe ability to use mediation to successfully resolve grievances is essential for labour relations practitioners and requires effective preparation\, strong negotiation and advocacy skills\, and attention to the needs and interests of each party. In this workshop\, panelists will provide expert guidance on representing workplace parties at mediation. The session will cover practical skills and key legal concepts\, equipping attendees to: \n\nRecognize how power imbalances and “invisible” barriers may impact the mediation process and take steps to address those barriers;\nDetermine when it is appropriate to use mediation to seek to resolve a grievance;\nSelect a mediation process (such as mediation-arbitration versus distinct mediation and arbitration processes) and select an appropriate mediator;\nPrepare for the mediation strategically and thoroughly;\nCommunicate effectively and use different negotiating styles to relay a position and bridge impasses;\nUnderstand and leverage opposing parties’ interests and objectives;\nApply key legal and practical considerations in crafting settlement agreements; and\nRecognize when settlement is unlikely and arbitration is necessary.\n\nAttendees will work together on an interactive exercise guided by the workshop facilitators\, allowing participants to apply principles and practice skills learned throughout the day in a supportive setting. \nWorkshop 2 - Conducting Effective\, Fair\, and Bias-Free Investigations: A practical\, hands-on workshop \n\n\n \nSylvie Lang\nLawyer and Workplace Investigator\nSouthern Butler Price \n\n\n \nJackie Laviolette\nEmployer Counsel\nMathews\, Dinsdale & Clark LLP \n\n\n \nMaryna McTague\nUnion Counsel\nSeveny Scott \n\n\nWorkplace investigations are essential for addressing harassment and discrimination\, but if mishandled\, they can cause further harm to employee well-being and lead to the loss of valuable employees. This full-day workshop offers hands-on scenarios and practical insights to ensure fair\, effective investigations that strengthen workplace culture. The panel will explore the following questions: \n\nIdentify procedural mistakes that can render investigations inadequate;\nUnderstand how adjudicators assess and award damages for an employer’s failure to investigate;\nEvaluate when to conduct an internal investigation versus retaining an external investigator;\nRecognize signs of trauma in complainants and witnesses and adapt investigative approaches accordingly;\nApply interview techniques that encourage participation while minimizing re-traumatization;\nEnsure investigations accommodate employees with disabilities\, language barriers\, and other diverse needs;\nImplement practical steps to protect involved parties during an ongoing investigation;\nEnhance transparency in investigative decision-making processes; and\nExplore ways unions and management can support workplace positive workplace relations after an investigation.\n\nWorkshop 3 - Disabilities that Elude Diagnosis: Obtaining medical information\, creating appropriate accommodations \n\n\n \nGreg Francis\nArbitrator and Mediator \n\n\n \nApril Kosten\nEmployer Counsel\nDentons LLP \n\n\n \nDr. Maryana Kravtsenyuk\nAssistant Clinical Professor Department of Psychiatry\nUniversity of Alberta \n\n\n \nCherie Langlois-Klassen\nUnion Counsel\nBlair Chahley Klassen \n\n\nAn employer’s duty to accommodate an employee’s disability can apply even without a formal diagnosis. This session explores the challenges of complex disabilities\, offering guidance on appropriate inquiries\, effective accommodations\, and when undue hardship has been established. Participants will engage in practical scenarios and leave this session with an understanding of key issues\, including: \n\nWhat it means to have a medical condition that eludes diagnosis;\nRequirements for establishing a disability and how this applies to disabilities that are difficult to diagnose;\nWhat information an employer is entitled to in the accommodation process for difficult-to-diagnose disabilities and how employers can approach asking for this information;\nWhat information an employee must and/or should provide in the accommodation process for these disabilities;\nHow employers and unions can approach accommodation where information and expertise may be scarce\, the disability difficult to diagnose\, and/or more information than provided is needed;\nHow employers can distinguish between difficult-to-diagnose disabilities and sick leave abuse;\nThe role of the employer\, employee\, and union in accommodating disabilities that are difficult to diagnose;\nHow employers should respond to requests for accommodation prior to an official diagnosis and colleague complaints regarding these accommodations;\nSuggested accommodations for common difficult-to-diagnose conditions; and\nWhen undue hardship has been established.\n\nConferenceSponsored by:Conference registration includes access to an evening networking reception and plenary on June 12\, as well as three plenary sessions and your choice of two concurrent sessions on June 13. \nCocktail networking reception: 5:00 pm – 7:00 pm MT \nIntroductory remarks by co-chairs: 7:00 pm – 7:05 pm MT \nKeynote Speech by The Honourable Justice Michele H. Hollins - Lessons from my Breakdown - 7:05 pm – 7:35 pm MT\n\n\n \nThe Honourable Justice Michele H. Hollins\n\n\nLessons from my Breakdown \nBreak: 7:35 pm – 7:45 pm MT \nEvening Plenary - Labour Relations in Uncertain Times: Exploring the implications of the economic and political climate for the world of work - 7:45 pm – 9:00 pm MT\n\n\n \nTricia Gibbs\nLabour Relations Officer\nUnited Nurses of Alberta (UNA) \n\n\n \nChantel Kassongo\nEmployer Counsel\nNeuman Thompson \n\n\n \nCharles St-Arnaud\nChief Economist\nCredit Union Central Alberta \n\n\n \nTrevor Tombe\nProfessor\nDepartment of Economics\nUniversity of Calgary \n\n\nIn an era of economic uncertainty and political change\, unions and employers must address evolving labour policies\, geopolitical pressures\, and shifting worker expectations. The panel will examine key economic and political trends shaping collective bargaining and workplace relations in 2025\, specifically addressing: \n\nWhat short- and long-term economic and political trends are predicted in 2025 in Alberta? In Canada?\nHow are broader geopolitical events\, including global economic instability\, supply chain disruptions\, rail strikes\, and international trade agreements\, affecting labour relations and economic security for workers in Alberta and across Canada?\nHow will U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods and services impact workplace stability and collective bargaining in Alberta\, and what ongoing effects can be expected? What strategies can unions and employers implement to navigate these challenges?\nWhat changes can be expected to employment standards and regulations on strike activity\, and how will they influence bargaining strategies?\nWhat key demands are emerging at the bargaining table in the current climate? How are debates on workplace rights\, AI\, remote work\, EDI\, gig work\, job security\, and social justice influencing priorities at the bargaining table?\nHow can unions and employers address the growing political polarization in workplaces\, especially when employees have diverging views on economic policy\, government intervention\, and labour rights?\n\nFriday\, June 13\, 2025Breakfast: 8:00 am – 8:40 am MT \nIntroductory remarks by co-chairs: 8:40 am – 8:45 am MT \nPlenary 2 - The Latest in Labour Law: Significant recent cases and legislative developments - 8:45 am – 10:00 am MT\n\n\n \nBob Blakely\nUnion Counsel\nBlakely + Dushenski Legal Counsel \n\n\n \nKaren Scott\nArbitrator/Mediator \n\n\n \nJean Torrens\nEmployer Counsel\nMLT Aikins LLP \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will delve into recent significant developments in federal and provincial labour law\, exploring guiding principles and emerging trends in a changing world of work. Panelists will address the latest cases on topics including: \n\nthe legality of recent federal government interventions pausing or prohibiting strikes in the railway\, postal\, and other sectors;\nimplications of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Quebec Casinos\, case denying collective bargaining rights to front line supervisors;\na recent Quebec Court of Appeal decision upholding the role of unions in the selection of interest arbitrators;\ndiscrimination\, harassment\, and accommodation;\nemployee social media use and expression of political views and/or religious beliefs at work;\ntrends in discipline and damages awards;\nremote work – employer discretion and employee entitlement; and\nissues of justification for substance use testing.\n\nPanelists will also address recent legislative and regulatory developments\, such as: \n\nupdated government guidance regarding requirements under federal supply chain transparency legislation;\nupdates to Alberta’s access to information and privacy legislation\, including new obligations regarding reporting privacy breaches\, notice requirements regarding the use of automated decision-making\, and new powers to disregard access to information requests in certain circumstances;\nlegislation restricting the use of strike replacement workers passed federally and in Manitoba; and\nnewly proposed legislation in Quebec on arbitrator selection and government powers to pause or prohibit strikes.\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks leading up to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy developments in a shifting socioeconomic and political landscape. \nMorning break: 10:00 am – 10:15 am MT \nPlenary 3 - Bargaining Chips and Microchips: Addressing technological change\, surveillance\, monitoring\, and privacy in the workplace - 10:15 am – 11:20 am MT\n\n\n \nMark Asbell\nArbitrator\, Mediator\, and Adjudicator\nAsbell Dispute Resolutions \n\n\n \nDr. Gideon Christian\nUniversity Excellence Research Chair (AI and Law)\nFaculty of Law\nUniversity of Calgary \n\n\n \nClayton Cook\nUnion Counsel\nMcGown Cook \n\n\n \nVicki Giles\nEmployer Counsel\nMcLennan Ross LLP \n\n\nHow can workplaces ensure that their use of technology complies with existing employee privacy and human rights laws while also navigating emerging legal and technological uncertainties? The panel will explore the potential impact of emerging artificial intelligence (AI) and surveillance technologies on employee privacy and productivity\, and how workplaces can address these challenges in collective agreements. Specifically\, the panel will address: \n\nHow have arbitrators treated the use of emerging monitoring and surveillance technologies intended to measure employee productivity? What lessons can be learned from these decisions when negotiating collective agreement language?\nWhat current issues related to using technology in the workplace\, particularly the use of AI\, should employers and unions address through collective bargaining?\nAre employees entitled to information about how their employer is using AI\, monitoring\, and surveillance technologies? What role do unions have in what employee information employers collect and how it is used?\nHow can collective bargaining be used to protect against the risks of emerging technologies such as “algorithmic management” and address the relevant concerns of both employers and unions?\nDoes the use of emerging surveillance technology make it more difficult for employers to ensure they are avoiding employee privacy breaches\, particularly in terms of the limits on off-duty surveillance? How should the limits on off-duty surveillance be addressed through collective agreement language?\nWhat language should be included in collective agreement provisions addressing AI\, technology\, and employee privacy?\n\nBreak: 11:20 am – 11:35 am MT \nConcurrent Sessions (Choice of 2 of 3) Concurrent 1 - What’s Fresh in Fact-Finding? The latest on best practices in workplace investigations\n\n\n \nDana Christianson\nUnion Lawyer\nSeveny Scott \n\n\n \nSarah Coderre\nCounsel\nBow River Law \n\n\n \nJennifer Hawkins\nPartner\nSouthern Butler Price LLP \n\n\nIn this panel\, experts will examine recent cases addressing workplace investigations and explore key principles and best practices towards conducting fair\, adequate\, and effective investigations into human rights related allegations. The panel will address: \n\nWhat lessons can be learned from recent cases as to what constitutes a fair and adequate investigation process? What procedural flaws have been found to render an investigation unfair or inadequate?\nTo what extent are investigations privileged? How should employers navigate issues of privilege and confidentiality when conducting workplace investigations? How can investigators protect an employee’s privacy rights during a workplace investigation?\nHow can employers best determine who should lead an investigation? How much should independence factor into who should investigate workplace incidents and harassment? When should an external investigator be retained?\nHow can investigators address systemic inequalities and unconscious biases in the workplace during the fact-finding process? How does adopting a trauma-informed approach to conducting witness interviews affect an investigation?\nWhat measures should an employer take when an allegation is not substantiated? Does the union have a role in restoring workplace harmony following an unsubstantiated investigation?\n\nConcurrent 2 - Compliance and Compassion: Providing representation while accommodating disabilities and meeting professional obligations\n\n\n \nKara O’Halloran\nUnion Counsel\nChivers Carpenter \n\n\n \nJeremy Schick\nVice-Chair\nAlberta Labour Relations Board \n\n\n \nJill Wilkie\nEmployer Counsel\nMiller Thomson LLP \n\n\nNavigating the complexities of representing employees who may seem “difficult to work with” (e.g. combative\, non-responsive\, or invested in their matter to an above-average degree) requires a balance of compassionate representation and adherence to legal obligations. Panelists will provide practical guidance for labour relations professionals in handling these sensitive situations. Topics to be addressed include: \n\nWhat key rules of professional conduct establish obligations when representing grievors? What legal duties apply to union representatives?\nWhat signs may indicate that an employee has a mental health condition or other disability impacting their conduct while being represented? How can parties distinguish a “vexatious” grievor from an individual who simply needs additional support?\nHow should representatives respond when the employee being represented is exhibiting behavior such as being hostile or non-responsive\, and/or exhibiting diminished capacity? What legal duties do representatives have in this context?\nHow might trauma\, cultural factors\, or previous experiences of discrimination impact the way an individual acts throughout a complaint? How can representatives approach helping grievors navigate through these issues?\nHow can representatives ensure that their own biases do not impact their representation? Are there circumstances where a representative should refuse or step away from representing a grievor?\n\nConcurrent 3 - From Resolution to Results: Implementing EDI in the unionized workplace\n\n\n \nSania Chaudhry\nInvestigator\nUBC Investigations Office \n\n\n \nSteve Durrell\nRegional Executive Officer – Alberta\nUnited Steelworkers Local 1944 \n\n\n \nJames Demers\nSenior Strategist and Trainer\nCanadian Equality Consulting \n\n\nCanadian workplaces are increasingly recognizing the need to apply the principles of equity\, diversity\, and inclusion (EDI) in their policies and practices. In this panel\, experts will provide practical guidance on how employers and unions can foster a work environment that ensures the full and fair participation of employees. Questions discussed will include: \n\nIn what ways does systemic racism manifest in the workplace? What factors should be considered in determining whether systemic discrimination has adversely impacted an employee?\nHow have arbitrators and human rights tribunals resolved evidentiary and credibility challenges when determining whether discrimination has occurred?\nWhen will a rule or standard that on its face appears to be discriminatory be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement? When will accommodating an employee amount to undue hardship?\nWhen will employers be held liable for the discriminatory conduct of employees toward other employees in the workplace?\nAre changing social contexts affecting how workplace parties approach the task of preventing and responding to discrimination and harassment? What is the role of diversity and inclusion training?\nWhat are the required features of an effective workplace policy on discrimination? How can employers ensure their violence and harassment policies are compliant with upcoming amendments to Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety Code?\n\nConcurrent Session: 11:35 am – 12:35 pm MT \nLunch: 12:35 pm – 1:45 pm MT \nConcurrent Session: 1:45 pm – 2:45 pm MT \nAfternoon break: 2:45 pm – 3:00 pm MT \nPlenary 4 - Discrimination and Harassment at Arbitration: Experts examine key cases\, evolving arbitral perspectives\, evidentiary considerations\, and more - 3:00 pm – 4:15 pm MT\n\n\n \nDamon Bailey\, K.C.\nPartner\nMcLennan Ross LLP \n\n\n \nLeanne Chahley\nUnion Counsel\nBlair Chahley Klassen \n\n\n \nAndrew C.L. Sims K.C.\nArbitration & Mediation \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will explore evolving arbitral perspectives with respect to discrimination and harassment and examine systemic barriers in grievance and arbitration processes. Specifically\, panelists will discuss: \n\nHow does systemic discrimination influence decisions about how grievances are handled\, including which should proceed to arbitration?\nWhat do recent decisions suggest about how arbitral approaches are evolving with respect to discrimination and harassment claims? Are damage awards increasing? Is there a greater willingness to impose discipline?\nHow have arbitrators and other decision-makers resolved evidentiary and credibility challenges when determining whether discrimination or harassment has occurred? What evidence must be presented at arbitration to such claims? When is it necessary or appropriate to present expert evidence?\nHow can trauma\, cultural factors\, or experiences of discrimination impact the way in which a witness delivers evidence? How can bias and stereotypes impact a decision-maker’s assessment as to credibility?\nShould parties use non-disclosure agreements or clauses when settling discrimination- or harassment-related grievances? Is legislative prohibition of NDAs a likely prospect?\nWhat policy updates should employers and unions implement to address discrimination and harassment claims and ensure that such grievances are not improperly prevented from reaching arbitration?\n\nCalgary Labour Arbitration and Policy ConferenceConference Co-Chairs\n\n \nDavid Lardner\nUnion Representative\, Disputes and Arbitration\nAlberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) \n\n\n \nErin Ludwig\nAssociate General Counsel Labour and Employment\nAlberta Health Services (AHS) \n\n\n \nJames Casey\nArbitrator and Mediation\nLabour Arbitration+Mediation \n\n\nConference Advisory Committee\n\n \nCheryl Yingst Bartel\nArbitrator/Mediator\nYingst Bartel ADR Inc. \n\n\n \nMaurice Dransfeld\nEmployer Counsel\nMcLennan Ross \n\n\n \nTom Hesse\nPresident\nUFCW Local 401 \n\n\n \nJacqueline Lacasse\nGeneral Counsel and VP People & Culture\nUniversity of Calgary \n\n\n \nNatalia Makuch\nUnion Counsel\nChivers Carpenter Lawyers \n\n\n \nJeremy Schick\nVice-Chair with the Labour Relations Board \n\n\nCPDConference CPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 7.3 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\nWorkshop CPD\n\n\nEach Pre-Conference Workshop has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 5.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/calgary-labour-arbitration-and-policy-conference-2025/
LOCATION:Sheraton Suites Calgary Eau Claire\, 255 Barclay Parade Southwest\, Calgary\, Alberta\, T2P 5C2\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Conference,Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/calgary-lapc-2025-banner.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250619T123000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250619T140000
DTSTAMP:20260404T020108
CREATED:20241115T202156Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250610T214652Z
UID:15349-1750336200-1750341600@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:Lancaster’s Workplace Essentials: Employee medical information for sick leave\, accommodation\, and return-to-work – When and what medical information can employers request?
DESCRIPTION:In this installment of Lancaster’s Workplace Essentials webinar series\, panelists will review key principles governing the collection of employee medical information in unionized workplaces. \nThe webinar will address questions including: \nOption: Live Webinar\, video\, and MP3 Bundle | Live Webinar | Video and MP3$595.00Add to cart	\n			\n \n\nDoes the type and scope of information that employers can request differ depending on the purpose for which the information is being collected (e.g. in relation to benefits administration\, sick leaves\, accommodation\, attendance management\, or certification of fitness and return to work)?\nIs an employer entitled to information regarding an employee’s condition? Or only about any restrictions on job duties?\nWhat can employers or unions do when medical information is based largely on self-reporting? Must employees provide “objective evidence” of their conditions\, such as the results of a medical test or standardized clinical measure?\nCan workplace parties request more specific information where the information provided is vague\, deficient\, or contradictory?\n\n\nWhen is it permissible to request that an employee provide a specialist report or undergo an independent medical examination? What is the union’s role when this has been requested?\nAre employers or unions entitled to communicate directly with an employee’s physician or require the employee be authorized to do so or provide a “blanket release” of employee medical information?\nIn what circumstances have arbitrators found standardized medical forms to be overbroad or otherwise inappropriate?\nHow should employers and unions respond where an employee fails to provide medical information that has legitimately been requested?\n\nModerator\n\n \nArvin Asadi\nLawyer and Workplace Investigator\nSouthern Butler Price \n\n\nSpeakers\n\n \nPhilip Abbink\nUnion Counsel\nCavalluzzo LLP \n\n\n \nMarc Rodrigue\nPartner\, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP \n\n\nAccreditationCPD\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR Alberta for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved by CPHR BC & Yukon for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\n\n\n\n\nThis program has been approved for Continuing Professional Development 1.5 hours under Section A of the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Log of the Human Resource Professionals Association (HRPA).\n\n\n\n\n \n\nThis program has been approved by the Law Society of British Columbia for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of Ontario may consider counting this program for 1.5 Substantive hours; 0 Professionalism hours.\nMembers of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society may count this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.\nMembers of the Law Society of New Brunswick may consider this program for 1.5 Continuing Professional Development hours.
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/lancasters-workplace-essentials-employee-medical-information-for-sick-leave-accommodation-and-return-to-work-when-and-what-medical-information-can-employers-request/
LOCATION:Virtual Event
CATEGORIES:Webinar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Lancasters-Workplace-Essentials-Employee-medical-information-for-sick-leave.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR