BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Lancaster House - ECPv6.15.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lancasterhouse.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Lancaster House
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20260308T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20261101T070000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260618
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20260620
DTSTAMP:20260412T221233
CREATED:20251028T171445Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260326T194142Z
UID:18337-1781740800-1781913599@lancasterhouse.com
SUMMARY:44th Annual Alberta Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference
DESCRIPTION:Sponsored by:Overview \nSince its launch in 1981\, the Annual Alberta Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference has served as a cornerstone gathering for Alberta’s labour relations community—offering not only timely legal and policy updates but also valuable networking opportunities with leading voices in the field. \nThis year’s conference brings together top arbitrators\, lawyers\, union representatives\, and HR professionals for in-depth discussions on the most pressing developments in labour arbitration and workplace policy. Expert-led panels will cover critical topics such as recent case law\, legislative changes\, policy trends\, and the practical challenges shaping today’s labour landscape in Alberta. \nThe conference will feature concurrent panels and hands-on workshops\, allowing attendees to customize their experience by choosing the sessions most relevant to their interests and professional roles. With a strong emphasis on connection and collaboration\, this event is designed to foster dialogue\, spark new ideas\, and strengthen professional relationships across the labour relations community. \nWhether you’re navigating complex arbitration issues or refining your workplace strategies\, the Alberta conference offers the insight\, flexibility\, and network you need to stay ahead. \n\nWhat to Expect \nThe event begins with an evening networking reception\, providing a relaxed setting to connect with fellow attendees\, speakers\, and leaders from the labour community. This will be followed by an evening plenary session\, offering thought-provoking discussion to set the stage for the next day’s program. \nThe following day features a full schedule of expert-led panels\, including concurrent sessions that allow participants to tailor their experience by choosing the topics most relevant to their interests and professional needs. Panelists will represent union-side\, employer-side\, and neutral perspectives\, offering balanced\, practical insights through moderated discussions. Attendees will have the opportunity to ask questions—either verbally or electronically—at the end of each session. \nIn addition to the live content\, participants will receive a comprehensive package of digital materials\, including textbook chapters\, case summaries\, and other carefully curated resources. Developed through extensive research by Lancaster House program lawyers\, these materials are designed to support continued learning long after the event. \n\nWho Should Attend? \nThis conference will provide invaluable learning and networking opportunities for professionals involved in shaping and managing workplace policy\, arbitration\, and labour relations. It is designed for individuals across a range of industries\, including: \n\nArbitrators & Mediators – Decision-makers and dispute resolution professionals seeking to stay current with evolving practices and jurisprudence.\nNegotiators & Bargaining Agents – Professionals involved in collective bargaining looking to strengthen their strategies and deepen their understanding of recent legal and policy developments.\nHuman Resources Leaders – HR managers\, directors\, and disability management specialists navigating workplace accommodations\, discipline\, and compliance.\nEmployment & Labour Lawyers – Legal professionals seeking updates on arbitration trends\, case law\, and legislative changes.\nUnion Representatives & Labour Relations Experts – Advocates working to ensure fair treatment in the workplace and effective collective bargaining outcomes.\nCorporate Executives & Compliance Officers – Business leaders responsible for aligning workplace policies with legal requirements and best practices.\nGovernment & Public Sector Professionals – HR and legal representatives working within municipal\, provincial\, and federal public service contexts.\n\nWhether you are resolving disputes\, negotiating agreements\, or developing workplace policy\, this conference offers the insights and connections you need to stay informed and effective. \n\nLearning Outcomes \nBy attending this conference\, you will: \n✔ Stay up to date on the latest developments in labour arbitration\, workplace policy\, and employment law across Alberta. \n✔ Strengthen your skills in interpreting and applying arbitration awards\, legislative changes\, and policy decisions in real-world workplace contexts. \n✔ Gain practical strategies for resolving disputes\, drafting effective workplace policies\, and navigating complex issues in collective bargaining. \n✔ Learn from leading arbitrators\, legal experts\, union and employer representatives through engaging discussions and case-based analysis. \n✔ Connect with fellow practitioners\, negotiators\, and decision-makers to expand your professional network and exchange ideas. \n\nSample MaterialsClick here to see an excerpt from last year’s materials! \n\nThursday\, June 18\, 2026 \nRegistration: 4:30 pm – 5:00 pm \n\nOpening remarks: 5:00 pm – 5:05 pm \n\nKeynote - The Evolution of Labour Arbitration in Alberta: Change\, Challenges\, and Collaboration - 5:05 pm – 5:35 pm\n\n\n \nJames Casey\nArbitrator\nLabour Arbitration+Mediation \n\n\nBreak: 5:35 pm – 5:50 pm \n\nPlenary 1 - Uses and Abuses of Modern Technology: An interactive\, scenario-based session on social media\, employee monitoring\, and AI - 5:50 pm – 7:05 pm\n\n\n \nWilson Chan\nEmployer Counsel\nMathews\, Dinsdale & Clark LLP \n\n\n \nPete Desrochers\nArbitrator/Mediator\nThe Negotiators \n\n\n \nElla Henry\nCounsel\nCanadian Union of Public Employees \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will examine the complex challenges and potential opportunities arising from the use of emerging technologies in the workplace. Speakers will analyze three scenarios relating to social media use\, employee monitoring\, and artificial intelligence (“AI”)\, addressing questions such as: \n\nWhen can employers discipline or dismiss employees for inappropriate social media posts or activities? How have arbitrators and adjudicators in recent cases balanced employees’ freedom to express themselves on social media against the employer’s interest in protecting its reputation and preventing harm to other employees?\nHow can employers and unions navigate conflicts between competing human rights that may arise in the context of social media use? For example\, how should employers and unions respond when an employee makes an online post that another employee asserts is discriminatory\, but which the posting employee claims is protected speech under the Human Rights Code or the Charter?\nWhat limits do federal and Alberta privacy laws place on employee monitoring and surveillance? How have arbitrators and adjudicators balanced employee privacy rights against the employer’s interest in managing productivity? What factors determine whether electronic monitoring crosses the line into unreasonable oversight?\nWhen can an employer discipline an employee for misconduct discovered through routine monitoring or surveillance? For example\, can an employer that is monitoring employee devices for the stated purpose of ensuring performance and productivity discipline an employee for misconduct entirely unrelated to those criteria?\nWhat challenges and legal risks may arise in using artificial intelligence in hiring\, promotion\, and performance management? Can employers and unions be held liable for flaws in AI systems that result in discriminatory hiring and management processes? Will establishment of a human rights review process or reliance on bias testing be sufficient to shield an organization from liability?\n\nScenarios will be finalized in the weeks prior to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most pressing issues.\nNetworking Reception: 7:05 pm – 9:00 pm \n\nFriday June 19\, 2026 \nBreakfast and Registration: 8:00 am – 9:00 am \n\nOpening remarks: 9:00 am – 9:05 am \n\nPlenary 2 - New and Noteworthy: Key recent cases and legislative developments in Alberta - 9:05 am – 10:20 am\n\n\n \nLaura Dunnigan\nEmployer CounselMathews Dinsdale \n\n\n \nGreg Francis\nArbitrator and Mediator \n\n\n \nNatalia Makuch\nUnion CounselChivers Carpenter \n\n\nIn this session\, panelists will delve into recent significant developments in federal and provincial labour law\, exploring key principles and emerging trends in a changing world of work. Panelists and accompanying materials will address the following: \nCaselaw and Ongoing Legal Challenges \n\nHow has the Alberta government’s introduction of the Back to School Act (2025)\, ordering striking teachers to return to work\, impacted labour relations within the province? Is the provincial government’s use of the notwithstanding clause open to challenge\, and what lessons can be learned from recent uses of this clause? How have courts and tribunals balanced the competing interests and legal rights at stake when addressing the legality of government intervention in strike actions?\nWill expressing personal or political beliefs at work warrant discipline? Is it discriminatory to discipline or reprimand an employee for being “oversensitive” in conversations about certain subjects – for example\, about their country of origin or about Canada’s Indigenous relations policies?\nCan employees be dismissed for non-compliance with vaccine policies?\nHow have arbitral approaches to evaluating discipline for harassment\, discrimination\, and violence at work changed in recent years? What trends in damages are evident for workplace human rights violations?\nIs an employer obliged to investigate incidents involving harassment if there is no formal complaint?\nWill specifying an age “cut-off” for benefits constitute discrimination or violation of the Charter?\nHow far does the duty to inquire into a disability extend? Does the employer have a duty to inquire into the voluntariness of an employee’s resignation when that employee has a history of mental health concerns?\nWhat aspects of an absenteeism management policy will render that policy unreasonable?\nWhat factors will arbitrators consider when determining whether a hiring or promotion process was fair or reasonable? How does collective agreement language impact this analysis?\nWhat collective bargaining lessons can be learned from recent decisions from the Alberta Labour Relations Board addressing unfair labour practices\, bad faith bargaining\, and illegal strikes?\n\nLegislation \nThe session and materials will also cover recent and upcoming changes to legislation in Alberta and in the federal jurisdiction\, such as: \n\nWhat is the status of ongoing legal challenges to the federal government’s use of s. 107 of the Canada Labour Code to intervene in lawful strike actions in the airline\, railway\, postal\, and other sectors? Will recent controversial cases regarding the use by the federal government of Canada Labour Code  107 result in legislative changes?\nWhat new limits has Alberta’s government introduced regarding the authority of regulatory bodies to discipline professionals for off-duty speech or to impose EDI training?\nWhat changes to Alberta’s private sector privacy legislation are being considered through the ongoing Personal Information Protection Act consultation? What is the deadline for public bodies to introduce a “privacy management program” pursuant to recent amendments to Alberta’s Protection of Privacy Act\, and what must be included in this program?\nWhat new or expanded leaves have been introduced in Alberta in the past year?\nWhat are the similarities and differences between Alberta and Quebec legislation restricting the use of union dues for non-core union activities? How has the Alberta Labour Relations Board defined “core” and “non-core activities” when interpreting the relevant provincial legislation?\nWhat measures have been introduced at a federal and provincial level in response to the trade conflict between Canada and the US?\nWhich provinces have passed legislation restricting employers’ rights to ask for doctors’ notes in support of short-term sick leave?\nWhat measures impacting workplaces were proposed in the federal government’s recent “Canada Strong Budget 2025”? What amendments have recently been made to the Canada Labour Code?\nHow far does recent Quebec legislation expand government authority to restrict or end lawful strikes and lockouts and refer labour disputes to interest arbitration?\n\nFinal selection of topics will take place in the weeks prior to the conference\, ensuring coverage of the latest and most newsworthy topics in a shifting legal landscape. \nBreak: 10:20 am – 10:35 am \n\nPlenary 3 - Navigating Alberta's Economic and Political Currents: Examining the implications for labour relations and collective bargaining - 10:35 am – 11:35 am\n\n\n \nThomas Hesse\nPresident\, united Food and commercial workers Canada local 401 \n\n\n \nChantel Kassongo\nEmployer Counsel\nNeuman Thompson \n\n\n \nJoseph Marchand\nDirector\nAlberta Centre for Labour Market Research (ACLMR)\nCo-Director\, Institute for Public Economics (IPE)\nProfessor\, Faculty of Arts – Economics Department\nUniversity of Alberta \n\n\nAmid economic uncertainty\, with looming deficits and oil price complications the bargaining environment is more complex than ever. This plenary brings together labour relations experts to explore the latest trends\, emerging bargaining priorities\, and strategies for negotiating effectively in 2026. Specifically\, panelists will address: \n\nHow is Alberta’s economy currently performing\, and what do near-term economic forecasts suggest for public-sector bargaining in 2026\, including expectations around compensation growth and affordability?\nIn what ways has recent legislation\, including the Back to School Act and the use of the notwithstanding clause\, influenced collective bargaining and labour relations dynamics in Alberta?\nWhat non‑monetary provisions (e.g.\, job protections\, health and safety workload management\, training and development) are becoming important bargaining priorities in the current climate?\nIs uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policies likely to affect bargaining outcomes in Alberta’s broader public sector? Are there other international or federal policy developments that negotiators should be mindful of?\nHow can employers and unions best adapt their bargaining strategies to remain effective\, constructive\, and sustainable amid ongoing economic and political uncertainty?\n\nLunch: 11:35 am – 12:35 pm \n\nConcurrent Sessions: 12:35 PM – 1:50 PM (Choice of 2 of 3) Concurrent 1 - Bargaining in the Evolving Workplace: Generational differences\, remote and flexible work arrangements\, new technologies\, EDI\, and more\n\n\n \nChris Monfette\nEmployer Counsel\nNeuman Thompson\n\n\n \nTerry Sway\nAssociate Director\, Negotiations\nNon-Academic Staff Association (NASA) at University of Edmonton \n\n\nTechnological advances and evolving societal expectations are driving the need for modernization of collective agreements. This session will equip attendees with the knowledge required to approach bargaining and employee relations more effectively. Specifically\, the panel will address: \n\nIn what circumstances will an employer’s return-to-office mandate conflict with the terms of a collective agreement? What aspects of remote or hybrid work arrangements have been negotiated in collective agreements? What flexible work options have the parties considered bargaining that would support employee well-being and attendance?\nHow are parties dealing with equity\, diversity\, and inclusion (“EDI”) issues at the bargaining table? What examples of inclusive leave and benefit provisions are beginning to appear in collective agreements?\nHow do inadequate staffing levels and high workloads affect the mental health of employees? How are the parties\, during bargaining\, working to adjuststaffing levels and workloads? In what other ways are the parties responding to employee mental health during bargaining?\nHow are employers and unions reconciling generational differences in the workplace that result in differing bargaining priorities?\nHow is the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) impacting employee hiring\, management\, and work? Are standard “technological change” provisions sufficient to respond to concerns associated with the effect of AI on the workforce?\nWhat are examples of collective agreement provisions relating to monitoring and surveillance associated with new technologies (e.g. biometric scanning\, GPS tracking) in the workplace? How have the parties addressed the privacy issues arising from the use of these new technologies?\nHow can parties best learn about the needs of employees or members when preparing for bargaining?\n\nConcurrent 2 - Clocking In\, Falling Behind: Expert insights on performance\, attendance\, and time theft issues in the workplace\n\n\n \nBruce Graham\nEmployer Counsel\nFasken \n\n\n \nKaren Thibault\nUnion Representative\nDisputes and Arbitrations\nAlberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) \n\n\nFrom keystroke logging to recorded video calls\, unprecedented tools are available to monitor how and when work gets done. But when does oversight become overreach? What are the legal and practical limits of workplace privacy and surveillance? Panelists will address: \n\nWhat constitutes employee “time theft”? How does time theft differ from a lack of productivity? Do employees’ intentions matter when determining if they committed time theft?\nWhat types of evidence can employers rely on to demonstrate time theft or productivity issues? Will circumstantial evidence suffice?\nHow should an employer approach time theft and productivity concerns at a disciplinary meeting? Are employers required to provide advance notice of the dates and times in question? What is the union’s role in this process?\nWhat disciplinary measures have adjudicators and arbitrators deemed appropriate for time theft?\nWhat consequences confront employers who impose discipline due to time theft without properly considering or inquiring into an employee’s disability or potential accommodation needs? How should unions support members with disabilities accused of time theft?\nHow do adjudicators balance an employer’s right to enforce productivity and an employee’s right to privacy? Does the permissible scope of surveillance differ for remote or hybrid workers?\nAre there any restrictions on how long employers can retain employee information gathered through surveillance? Can employers and adjudicators use data collected previously for another purpose for a future dispute?\nHow should workplace policies and collective agreements proactively address time theft?\n\nConcurrent 3 - Workplace Restructuring in Uncertain Times: Managing and responding to terminations\, lay-offs\, contracting in/out\, and more\n\n\n \nErin Ludwig\nAssociate General Counsel – Labour and Employment\nAlberta Health Services \n\n\n \nLisa Mason\nActing Regional Director – Alberta\nAlberta Regional Office\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) \n\n\nAs the country navigates turbulent economic times\, it is critical that employers and unions understand legal principles and best practices regarding workplace restructuring. In this session\, panelists will address key considerations including: \n\nWhat options\, short of large-scale restructuring\, are available to employers and unions seeking to mitigate economic pressures?\nWhen is it lawful for an employer to “outsource” work? What factors will an arbitrator consider in determining whether outsourcing constitutes a genuine “contracting out” or an impermissible “contracting in”?\nCan employers reassign duties to supervisors or employees outside the bargaining unit as part of restructuring?\nWill a unilateral reduction in an employee’s working hours or changes to an employee’s shift time\, position\, job classification\, or job location constitute a layoff requiring the application of seniority rights?\nHow does collective agreement language impact the order in which employees must be laid off and their recall and bumping rights?\nWhen will a “layoff” in fact amount to a termination? How do employees’ entitlements on termination change when they are let go as part of a large-scale restructuring?\nMust employers consult with unions when considering workplace restructuring or disclose plans to restructure during collective bargaining?\nWhat steps should be taken to preserve the morale\, health\, and safety of employees following a workplace reorganization?\nWhat legislative changes and government programs have recently been introduced to avoid or cushion the impact of large-scale downsizing or loss of employment through restructuring?\nWhat measures have parties negotiated in collective agreements to address the possibility of future workplace reorganizations?\n\nBreak: 1:50 pm – 2:05 pm \n\nConcurrent Sessions: 2:05 PM – 3:20 PM  (Choice of 2 of 3) \nConcurrent 1 - Bargaining in the Evolving Workplace: Generational differences\, remote and flexible work arrangements\, new technologies\, EDI\, and more\n\n\n \nChris Monfette\nEmployer Counsel\nNeuman Thompson\n\n\n \nTerry Sway\nAssociate Director\, Negotiations\nNon-Academic Staff Association (NASA) at University of Edmonton \n\n\nTechnological advances and evolving societal expectations are driving the need for modernization of collective agreements. This session will equip attendees with the knowledge required to approach bargaining and employee relations more effectively. Specifically\, the panel will address: \n\nIn what circumstances will an employer’s return-to-office mandate conflict with the terms of a collective agreement? What aspects of remote or hybrid work arrangements have been negotiated in collective agreements? What flexible work options have the parties considered bargaining that would support employee well-being and attendance?\nHow are parties dealing with equity\, diversity\, and inclusion (“EDI”) issues at the bargaining table? What examples of inclusive leave and benefit provisions are beginning to appear in collective agreements?\nHow do inadequate staffing levels and high workloads affect the mental health of employees? How are the parties\, during bargaining\, working to adjuststaffing levels and workloads? In what other ways are the parties responding to employee mental health during bargaining?\nHow are employers and unions reconciling generational differences in the workplace that result in differing bargaining priorities?\nHow is the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) impacting employee hiring\, management\, and work? Are standard “technological change” provisions sufficient to respond to concerns associated with the effect of AI on the workforce?\nWhat are examples of collective agreement provisions relating to monitoring and surveillance associated with new technologies (e.g. biometric scanning\, GPS tracking) in the workplace? How have the parties addressed the privacy issues arising from the use of these new technologies?\nHow can parties best learn about the needs of employees or members when preparing for bargaining?\n\nConcurrent 2 - Clocking In\, Falling Behind: Expert insights on performance\, attendance\, and time theft issues in the workplace\n\n\n \nBruce Graham\nEmployer Counsel\nFasken \n\n\n \nKaren Thibault\nUnion Representative\nDisputes and Arbitrations\nAlberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) \n\n\nFrom keystroke logging to recorded video calls\, unprecedented tools are available to monitor how and when work gets done. But when does oversight become overreach? What are the legal and practical limits of workplace privacy and surveillance? Panelists will address: \n\nWhat constitutes employee “time theft”? How does time theft differ from a lack of productivity? Do employees’ intentions matter when determining if they committed time theft?\nWhat types of evidence can employers rely on to demonstrate time theft or productivity issues? Will circumstantial evidence suffice?\nHow should an employer approach time theft and productivity concerns at a disciplinary meeting? Are employers required to provide advance notice of the dates and times in question? What is the union’s role in this process?\nWhat disciplinary measures have adjudicators and arbitrators deemed appropriate for time theft?\nWhat consequences confront employers who impose discipline due to time theft without properly considering or inquiring into an employee’s disability or potential accommodation needs? How should unions support members with disabilities accused of time theft?\nHow do adjudicators balance an employer’s right to enforce productivity and an employee’s right to privacy? Does the permissible scope of surveillance differ for remote or hybrid workers?\nAre there any restrictions on how long employers can retain employee information gathered through surveillance? Can employers and adjudicators use data collected previously for another purpose for a future dispute?\nHow should workplace policies and collective agreements proactively address time theft?\n\nConcurrent 3 - Workplace Restructuring in Uncertain Times: Managing and responding to terminations\, lay-offs\, contracting in/out\, and more\n\n\n \nErin Ludwig\nAssociate General Counsel – Labour and Employment\nAlberta Health Services \n\n\n \nLisa Mason\nActing Regional Director – Alberta\nAlberta Regional Office\nCanadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) \n\n\nAs the country navigates turbulent economic times\, it is critical that employers and unions understand legal principles and best practices regarding workplace restructuring. In this session\, panelists will address key considerations including: \n\nWhat options\, short of large-scale restructuring\, are available to employers and unions seeking to mitigate economic pressures?\nWhen is it lawful for an employer to “outsource” work? What factors will an arbitrator consider in determining whether outsourcing constitutes a genuine “contracting out” or an impermissible “contracting in”?\nCan employers reassign duties to supervisors or employees outside the bargaining unit as part of restructuring?\nWill a unilateral reduction in an employee’s working hours or changes to an employee’s shift time\, position\, job classification\, or job location constitute a layoff requiring the application of seniority rights?\nHow does collective agreement language impact the order in which employees must be laid off and their recall and bumping rights?\nWhen will a “layoff” in fact amount to a termination? How do employees’ entitlements on termination change when they are let go as part of a large-scale restructuring?\nMust employers consult with unions when considering workplace restructuring or disclose plans to restructure during collective bargaining?\nWhat steps should be taken to preserve the morale\, health\, and safety of employees following a workplace reorganization?\nWhat legislative changes and government programs have recently been introduced to avoid or cushion the impact of large-scale downsizing or loss of employment through restructuring?\nWhat measures have parties negotiated in collective agreements to address the possibility of future workplace reorganizations?\n\nBreak: 3:20 pm – 3:35 pm \n\nPlenary 4 - Complex Issues in Accommodation: Neurodiversity\, family status\, return-to-office mandates\, medical information\, and more - 3:35 pm – 4:50 pm\n\n\n \nBob Blakely\nUnion Counsel\nBlakely & Dushensky Legal Counsel \n\n\n \nApril Kosten\nEmployer Counsel\nDentons \n\n\n \nDr. Perry Sirota\nClinical & Forensic Psychologist\nSirota Psychological Services \n\n\nEmployers and unions often need to address the needs of employees and members that may not be immediately visible. In this panel\, experts will provide insight into complex accommodation issues and provide guidance on the types of information that can be requested or must be provided in support of various accommodation requests. Specifically: \n\nWhen will an employee be allowed to work from home as a form of health-related accommodation? Does an employee’s susceptibility to contracting an illness in the workplace warrant accommodation? What medical information is required to support such a request?\nWhat is “neurodivergence”? What types of medical information can employers request from neurodivergent employees seeking accommodation? What are common workplace accommodations for neurodivergent employees?\n\nWhat are the unique privacy concerns Involved? \n\nWhat are best practices for drafting initial and follow-up letters to medical professionals? Are employers or unions entitled to communicate directly with an employee’s medical professional? Is an employer ever entitled to an employee’s diagnosis?\nHow should employers and unions handle medical information that is based solely or largely on an employee’s subjective self-reporting of symptoms? Does the analysis differ for mental health disabilities where diagnoses are largely based on self-reported information?\nWhen will it be appropriate for an employer to request a fitness-to-work assessment or an Independent Medical Examination (“IME”)? What is the union’s role in this process?\nIn what circumstances have decision-makers found that employees should be permitted to work from home or on a full-time or part-time basis\, in order to accommodate obligations related to family status\, such as childcare or eldercare??\nWhat kinds of information can employers require to support a request related to family status? How can employers and unions distinguish an employee’s personal preferences from legitimate accommodation needs?\n\nFood and Beverages \nBreakfast and lunch to be provided\, with a variety of snacks and refreshments available during breaks. Breakfast is provided prior to the workshop and will be available starting at 8:00 am. Please share any dietary requirements at the time of registration so we can best accommodate your needs. \n\nPricing \nAlberta Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference – Evening Day 1 and Full Day 2 (Skills Training Workshop sold separately) \n$1\,495.00Select options	\n		This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page	\n  \nBundle pricing is available: \n\nAlberta Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference – Bundle (Conference Day + Workshop) \n$1\,995.00Select options	\n		This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page	\n  \nYou may also be interested in: \nAttendees can also register for one of three concurrent skills training workshops offered by our Centre for Labour Relations Training & Development\, taking place the day before the conference. The workshop includes panel discussions and hands-on scenarios addressing bargaining and labour arbitration challenges and is designed to complement the Alberta Labour Arbitration and Policy Conference. The conference and workshop may be attended separately or as a bundled registration. Attendees have the option to pick one of: \nWorkshop 1: Bargaining in Complex Times: Advanced skills to prepare for\, cost\, negotiate\, and communicate in collective bargaining \nWorkshop 2: Honing Your Grievance and Arbitration Skills: Tools and tactics for effective representation \nWorkshop 3: After the Investigation: Defusing conflicts and restoring workplace relationships \nConference Co-Chairs \n\n\n \nThomas Hesse\nPresident\nUnited Food and commercial workers Canada local 401 \n\n\n \nJacqueline Lacasse\nGeneral Counsel and VP People & Culture\nUniversity of Calgary \n\n\n \nJeremy Schick\nVice-Chair with the Labour Relations Board \n\n\n\nAdvisory Committee \n\n  \n\n \nMark Asbell\, K.C.\nArbitrator\, Mediator\, and Adjudicator\nAsbell Dispute Resolutions \n\n\n \nClayton Cook\nUnion Counsel\nMcGowan Cook \n\n\n \nMarcella Clarke\nSenior Labour Relations Advisor\nAlberta Health Services \n\n\n \nJackie Laviolette\nEmployer Counsel\nMatthews Dinsdale & Clarke \n\n\n \nNancy Schlesinger\nChair and Essential Services Commissioner\nAlberta Labour Relations Board \n\n\n \nBen Zorn\nManager of Labour Relations\nAUPE \n\n\n\nCPD \nCPD\nLancaster House provides professional education programs that qualify for CPD credit for human resources professionals\, lawyers\, and paralegals across Canada. More details regarding specific approvals from CPD accreditors to come. \nThe Best Western Premier Calgary Plaza Hotel and Conference Centre - Discounted Room\nReserve By: Monday\, May 18\, 2026 \nAfter this date\, the special group rate will no longer be available and reservation requests will be based on availability that is subject to the hotel’s rates. \n\n\n\nStart date\nEnd date\nRoom rate\n\n\nJune 17\, 2026\nJune 19\, 2026\n$139 per night\n\n\n\nReservations Direct Phone: 1-(403) 248-888 \nToll-Free Number: 1-800-661-1464 \nGroup Name: Lancaster House 2026 \nAttendee Block Block ID Number: 394952 \nBooking Link: https://www.bestwestern.com/en_US/book/hotel-rooms.61102.html?groupId=9I9YR4K1 \nEmail your reservation request to res@calgaryplaza.com
URL:https://lancasterhouse.com/event/44th-annual-alberta-labour-arbitration-and-policy-conference/
LOCATION:The Best Western Premier Calgary Plaza Hotel and Conference Centre\, 1316 33 Street NE\, Calgary\, Alberta\, T2A 6B6\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Conference,Labour Law & Labour Policy
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lancasterhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/44th-Annual-Alberta-Labour-Arbitration-and-Policy-Conference.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR